{"title":"评估口腔内扫描在上颌缺损患者中的有效性:一项临床研究。","authors":"Deger Ongul, Bilge Gokcen-Rohlig","doi":"10.3290/j.ijcd.b6198699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of the intraoral scanner (IOS) for obtaining digital scans of maxillary defects and adjacent tissues to fabricate obturator prosthesis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Ten randomly selected patients who required an obturator prosthesis after maxillary resection underwent both conventional (CI) and digital (DI) impressions. CI was obtained using traditional methods, and cast models were prepared. The cast models were digitized using a reference scanner in standard tessellation language (STL) format. For Group DI, an intraoral scanner (Trios 5; 3Shape TRIOS®Copenhagen, Denmark) was used for digital scans and the virtual models were created. The data of both groups were analysed by superimposing predetermined points using unreversed engineering software (Geomagic GmbH, 3D Systems, Rock Hill, USA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant deviations from normality (P > 0.05) were found in the predetermined points of the residual hard tissue in the STLs. No interaction was observed between the hard tissue components and the impression techniques used. However, accuracy significantly varied between overlapped points in defect parts across the two impression methods (P= 0 .028).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evaluation of IOS for digitally scanning maxillary defects shows that they are less effective than CI methods, performing adequately with shallow defects but facing challenges with deeper cavities. It is essential to advance these techniques and conduct clinical studies with larger patient groups to gain broader acceptance of DI methods for routine clinical use, particularly for deep defects.</p>","PeriodicalId":48666,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry","volume":"0 0","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the effectiveness of intraoral scanning in patients with maxillary defects: a clinical study.\",\"authors\":\"Deger Ongul, Bilge Gokcen-Rohlig\",\"doi\":\"10.3290/j.ijcd.b6198699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of the intraoral scanner (IOS) for obtaining digital scans of maxillary defects and adjacent tissues to fabricate obturator prosthesis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Ten randomly selected patients who required an obturator prosthesis after maxillary resection underwent both conventional (CI) and digital (DI) impressions. CI was obtained using traditional methods, and cast models were prepared. The cast models were digitized using a reference scanner in standard tessellation language (STL) format. For Group DI, an intraoral scanner (Trios 5; 3Shape TRIOS®Copenhagen, Denmark) was used for digital scans and the virtual models were created. The data of both groups were analysed by superimposing predetermined points using unreversed engineering software (Geomagic GmbH, 3D Systems, Rock Hill, USA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant deviations from normality (P > 0.05) were found in the predetermined points of the residual hard tissue in the STLs. No interaction was observed between the hard tissue components and the impression techniques used. However, accuracy significantly varied between overlapped points in defect parts across the two impression methods (P= 0 .028).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evaluation of IOS for digitally scanning maxillary defects shows that they are less effective than CI methods, performing adequately with shallow defects but facing challenges with deeper cavities. It is essential to advance these techniques and conduct clinical studies with larger patient groups to gain broader acceptance of DI methods for routine clinical use, particularly for deep defects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ijcd.b6198699\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computerized Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ijcd.b6198699","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评价口腔内扫描器(IOS)在上颌缺损及邻近组织数字化扫描制作闭孔假体的准确性。材料和方法:随机选择10例上颌切除术后需要闭孔假体的患者进行常规(CI)和数字(DI)印模。采用传统方法获得CI,并制备铸型模型。使用标准镶嵌语言(STL)格式的参考扫描仪对铸型模型进行数字化处理。对于DI组,口腔内扫描仪(Trios 5;3Shape TRIOS®哥本哈根,丹麦)用于数字扫描和创建虚拟模型。两组的数据通过使用非反向工程软件(Geomagic GmbH, 3D Systems, Rock Hill, USA)叠加预定点来分析。结果:stl残余硬组织预定点与正常状态无明显偏差(P > 0.05)。未观察到硬组织成分与所使用的印模技术之间的相互作用。然而,在两种印模方法中,缺陷部件的重叠点之间的精度显著不同(P= 0.028)。结论:对数字扫描上颌缺损的评价表明,IOS方法的效果不如CI方法,在浅层缺损中表现良好,但在深部缺损中面临挑战。必须推进这些技术,并在更大的患者群体中开展临床研究,以使DI方法在常规临床应用中得到更广泛的接受,特别是对于深度缺陷。
Assessment of the effectiveness of intraoral scanning in patients with maxillary defects: a clinical study.
Aim: To evaluate the accuracy of the intraoral scanner (IOS) for obtaining digital scans of maxillary defects and adjacent tissues to fabricate obturator prosthesis.
Material and methods: Ten randomly selected patients who required an obturator prosthesis after maxillary resection underwent both conventional (CI) and digital (DI) impressions. CI was obtained using traditional methods, and cast models were prepared. The cast models were digitized using a reference scanner in standard tessellation language (STL) format. For Group DI, an intraoral scanner (Trios 5; 3Shape TRIOS®Copenhagen, Denmark) was used for digital scans and the virtual models were created. The data of both groups were analysed by superimposing predetermined points using unreversed engineering software (Geomagic GmbH, 3D Systems, Rock Hill, USA).
Results: No significant deviations from normality (P > 0.05) were found in the predetermined points of the residual hard tissue in the STLs. No interaction was observed between the hard tissue components and the impression techniques used. However, accuracy significantly varied between overlapped points in defect parts across the two impression methods (P= 0 .028).
Conclusion: The evaluation of IOS for digitally scanning maxillary defects shows that they are less effective than CI methods, performing adequately with shallow defects but facing challenges with deeper cavities. It is essential to advance these techniques and conduct clinical studies with larger patient groups to gain broader acceptance of DI methods for routine clinical use, particularly for deep defects.
期刊介绍:
This journal explores the myriad innovations in the emerging field of computerized dentistry and how to integrate them into clinical practice. The bulk of the journal is devoted to the science of computer-assisted dentistry, with research articles and clinical reports on all aspects of computer-based diagnostic and therapeutic applications, with special emphasis placed on CAD/CAM and image-processing systems. Articles also address the use of computer-based communication to support patient care, assess the quality of care, and enhance clinical decision making. The journal is presented in a bilingual format, with each issue offering three types of articles: science-based, application-based, and national society reports.