Debbie Robson, Christina N Kyriakos, Ann McNeill, Sophie Harrington, Michelle Page, Richard J O'Connor, John Robins, Maciej L Goniewicz
{"title":"薄荷醇特征香料后,在英国销售的香烟香料:从感官和化学评估的结果。","authors":"Debbie Robson, Christina N Kyriakos, Ann McNeill, Sophie Harrington, Michelle Page, Richard J O'Connor, John Robins, Maciej L Goniewicz","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In May 2020, the United Kingdom banned menthol as a characteristic flavor in cigarettes. This study aimed to test cigarettes on sale in England in 2021-2022 for menthol and other characterizing flavors, through sensory and chemical testing.</p><p><strong>Aims and methods: </strong>Assessments were conducted for 20 cigarette brands (16 tests and four reference products). An untrained consumer panel of 50 people who smoked daily were each randomized to smell one of the two blocks of 10 unburnt cigarettes in duplicate (50 assessments per product). Using the Check-All-That-Apply method, participants assessed the presence of 22 odor attributes, including menthol/mint. For each test and reference cigarette, proportions of assessments that identified menthol/mint, \"fruity,\" \"confectionary\" and \"non-tobacco\" odors were identified and compared accounting for the within-participant duplicate testing. For each cigarette, the content of 34 flavoring chemicals (16 cooling/minty) was analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four of the sixteen test cigarette products were more frequently identified by participants as having a menthol/mint odor than reference products and had detectable levels of menthol/mint in the chemical tests. For four other test products, there was some discordance between the chemical and sensory assessments. Sensory testing also identified a fruity odor in six test products and a confectionary odor in one test product. The compounds dihydroxyacetone and triacetin were detected above the LLOQ in all products.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Four cigarette products for sale in England in 2021-2022 appeared non-compliant with the ban on menthol as a characterizing flavor in sensory and chemical tests.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Menthol is known to enhance the appeal of tobacco products, particularly among young people. The subjective nature of determining \"characterizing\" flavors in tobacco products creates compliance challenges. Our findings suggest that more stringent regulatory policies around flavoring additives used in tobacco products might be necessary. An outright ban on menthol, other minty flavorings, and additives not essential to the manufacturing process could provide clearer guidelines for manufacturers and regulators.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Menthol Characterizing Flavors in Cigarettes on Sale in England After a Characterizing Flavor Ban: Findings From Sensory and Chemical Assessments.\",\"authors\":\"Debbie Robson, Christina N Kyriakos, Ann McNeill, Sophie Harrington, Michelle Page, Richard J O'Connor, John Robins, Maciej L Goniewicz\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ntr/ntaf064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In May 2020, the United Kingdom banned menthol as a characteristic flavor in cigarettes. This study aimed to test cigarettes on sale in England in 2021-2022 for menthol and other characterizing flavors, through sensory and chemical testing.</p><p><strong>Aims and methods: </strong>Assessments were conducted for 20 cigarette brands (16 tests and four reference products). An untrained consumer panel of 50 people who smoked daily were each randomized to smell one of the two blocks of 10 unburnt cigarettes in duplicate (50 assessments per product). Using the Check-All-That-Apply method, participants assessed the presence of 22 odor attributes, including menthol/mint. For each test and reference cigarette, proportions of assessments that identified menthol/mint, \\\"fruity,\\\" \\\"confectionary\\\" and \\\"non-tobacco\\\" odors were identified and compared accounting for the within-participant duplicate testing. For each cigarette, the content of 34 flavoring chemicals (16 cooling/minty) was analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four of the sixteen test cigarette products were more frequently identified by participants as having a menthol/mint odor than reference products and had detectable levels of menthol/mint in the chemical tests. For four other test products, there was some discordance between the chemical and sensory assessments. Sensory testing also identified a fruity odor in six test products and a confectionary odor in one test product. The compounds dihydroxyacetone and triacetin were detected above the LLOQ in all products.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Four cigarette products for sale in England in 2021-2022 appeared non-compliant with the ban on menthol as a characterizing flavor in sensory and chemical tests.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Menthol is known to enhance the appeal of tobacco products, particularly among young people. The subjective nature of determining \\\"characterizing\\\" flavors in tobacco products creates compliance challenges. Our findings suggest that more stringent regulatory policies around flavoring additives used in tobacco products might be necessary. An outright ban on menthol, other minty flavorings, and additives not essential to the manufacturing process could provide clearer guidelines for manufacturers and regulators.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf064\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导语:2020年5月,英国禁止将薄荷醇作为香烟中的特色香料。这项研究旨在通过感官和化学测试,测试2021-2022年在英国销售的香烟的薄荷醇和其他特征口味。目的和方法:对20种卷烟品牌(16种试验产品和4种参考产品)进行了评估。一个由50名每天吸烟的未经训练的消费者小组被随机分为两组,每组10支未燃烧的香烟,每组闻一份(每个产品50次评估)。使用check - all - thatapply方法,参与者评估了22种气味属性的存在,包括薄荷/薄荷。对于每个测试和参考卷烟,确定薄荷/薄荷,“水果”,“糖果”和“非烟草”气味的评估比例被确定和比较,并考虑参与者内部重复测试。采用气相色谱-质谱法分析了每支香烟中34种调味化学物质(16种冷却/薄荷)的含量。结果:在16种测试卷烟产品中,有4种卷烟产品比参考卷烟产品更常被参与者识别为具有薄荷醇和薄荷气味,并且在化学测试中具有可检测的薄荷醇和薄荷含量。对于其他四种测试产品,化学评估和感官评估之间存在一些不一致。感官测试还在六种测试产品中发现了水果气味,在一种测试产品中发现了糖果气味。所有产品中二羟丙酮和三乙酸酯的含量均高于定量限。结论:2021-2022年在英国销售的四种卷烟产品在感官和化学测试中显示不符合薄荷醇作为特征风味的禁令。影响:已知薄荷醇可以增强烟草制品的吸引力,特别是对年轻人的吸引力。确定烟草产品中“特征”口味的主观性带来了合规挑战。我们的研究结果表明,对烟草产品中使用的调味添加剂实施更严格的监管政策可能是必要的。彻底禁止薄荷醇、其他薄荷香料和非必要的添加剂,可以为制造商和监管机构提供更清晰的指导方针。
Menthol Characterizing Flavors in Cigarettes on Sale in England After a Characterizing Flavor Ban: Findings From Sensory and Chemical Assessments.
Introduction: In May 2020, the United Kingdom banned menthol as a characteristic flavor in cigarettes. This study aimed to test cigarettes on sale in England in 2021-2022 for menthol and other characterizing flavors, through sensory and chemical testing.
Aims and methods: Assessments were conducted for 20 cigarette brands (16 tests and four reference products). An untrained consumer panel of 50 people who smoked daily were each randomized to smell one of the two blocks of 10 unburnt cigarettes in duplicate (50 assessments per product). Using the Check-All-That-Apply method, participants assessed the presence of 22 odor attributes, including menthol/mint. For each test and reference cigarette, proportions of assessments that identified menthol/mint, "fruity," "confectionary" and "non-tobacco" odors were identified and compared accounting for the within-participant duplicate testing. For each cigarette, the content of 34 flavoring chemicals (16 cooling/minty) was analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.
Results: Four of the sixteen test cigarette products were more frequently identified by participants as having a menthol/mint odor than reference products and had detectable levels of menthol/mint in the chemical tests. For four other test products, there was some discordance between the chemical and sensory assessments. Sensory testing also identified a fruity odor in six test products and a confectionary odor in one test product. The compounds dihydroxyacetone and triacetin were detected above the LLOQ in all products.
Conclusions: Four cigarette products for sale in England in 2021-2022 appeared non-compliant with the ban on menthol as a characterizing flavor in sensory and chemical tests.
Implications: Menthol is known to enhance the appeal of tobacco products, particularly among young people. The subjective nature of determining "characterizing" flavors in tobacco products creates compliance challenges. Our findings suggest that more stringent regulatory policies around flavoring additives used in tobacco products might be necessary. An outright ban on menthol, other minty flavorings, and additives not essential to the manufacturing process could provide clearer guidelines for manufacturers and regulators.
期刊介绍:
Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco.
It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas.
Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries.
The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.