在没有高血压诊断的成年人中进行血压检查的障碍和促进因素的理论映射:使用行为改变框架的系统综述和理论综合

IF 6.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Alison R McKinlay, Vivi Antonopoulou, Paulina M Schenk, Fabiana Lorencatto, Emily J Oliver, Ivo Vlaev, Michael P Kelly, Falko F Sniehotta, Angel M Chater
{"title":"在没有高血压诊断的成年人中进行血压检查的障碍和促进因素的理论映射:使用行为改变框架的系统综述和理论综合","authors":"Alison R McKinlay, Vivi Antonopoulou, Paulina M Schenk, Fabiana Lorencatto, Emily J Oliver, Ivo Vlaev, Michael P Kelly, Falko F Sniehotta, Angel M Chater","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2025.2485094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identifying influences on engagement with blood pressure (BP) checks can assist with intervention design for hypertension detection. This systematic review searched four databases (Embase, Emcare, MEDLINE and Web of Science) for papers published from 2015 to 2023 (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023398002). Eligible studies reported influences on BP checks in community or primary care settings. Data were coded and mapped using the Action, Actor, Context, Target, Time framework and Behaviour Change Wheel. Analysis of 18 studies generated eight themes: (1) 'Difficult-to-use devices with no accessible information on how to use them' (2) 'Lack of awareness about hypertension and BP checks', (3) 'Stigma and disconnect with identity' (4) 'Beliefs about the value of BP checks', (5) 'Fear and uncertainty', (6) 'Lack of appropriate and comfortable local services' (7) 'Financial cost of engaging with BP check services' and (8) 'Social contacts or health professional recommended a check'. Knowledge, identity, emotions, social contacts and environmental factors are key behavioural influences on adults' engagement with BP checks. Potential intervention strategies include education on hypertension, addressing misconceptions about BP checks, increasing access to BP check services and harnessing the influence of social norms, social connections and trusted sources to improve engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"1-31"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theoretical mapping of the barriers and enablers to having blood pressure checked among adults without a hypertension diagnosis: a systematic review and theoretical synthesis using behaviour change frameworks.\",\"authors\":\"Alison R McKinlay, Vivi Antonopoulou, Paulina M Schenk, Fabiana Lorencatto, Emily J Oliver, Ivo Vlaev, Michael P Kelly, Falko F Sniehotta, Angel M Chater\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17437199.2025.2485094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Identifying influences on engagement with blood pressure (BP) checks can assist with intervention design for hypertension detection. This systematic review searched four databases (Embase, Emcare, MEDLINE and Web of Science) for papers published from 2015 to 2023 (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023398002). Eligible studies reported influences on BP checks in community or primary care settings. Data were coded and mapped using the Action, Actor, Context, Target, Time framework and Behaviour Change Wheel. Analysis of 18 studies generated eight themes: (1) 'Difficult-to-use devices with no accessible information on how to use them' (2) 'Lack of awareness about hypertension and BP checks', (3) 'Stigma and disconnect with identity' (4) 'Beliefs about the value of BP checks', (5) 'Fear and uncertainty', (6) 'Lack of appropriate and comfortable local services' (7) 'Financial cost of engaging with BP check services' and (8) 'Social contacts or health professional recommended a check'. Knowledge, identity, emotions, social contacts and environmental factors are key behavioural influences on adults' engagement with BP checks. Potential intervention strategies include education on hypertension, addressing misconceptions about BP checks, increasing access to BP check services and harnessing the influence of social norms, social connections and trusted sources to improve engagement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Psychology Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2025.2485094\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2025.2485094","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确定参与血压(BP)检查的影响有助于高血压检测的干预设计。本系统综述检索了四个数据库(Embase、Emcare、MEDLINE和Web of Science),检索了2015 - 2023年发表的论文(PROSPERO ID: CRD42023398002)。符合条件的研究报告了社区或初级保健机构对血压检查的影响。使用动作、参与者、上下文、目标、时间框架和行为改变轮对数据进行编码和映射。对18项研究的分析产生了8个主题:(1)“难以使用的设备,没有可获取的使用信息”(2)“缺乏对高血压和血压检查的认识”,(3)“耻辱与身份脱节”(4)“关于BP支票价值的信念”,(5)“恐惧与不确定性”,(6)“缺乏适当和舒适的当地服务”(7)“使用BP支票服务的财务成本”和(8)“社会联系人或健康专家建议检查一下。”知识、身份、情感、社会交往和环境因素是影响成年人参与BP检查的主要行为因素。潜在的干预策略包括高血压教育、消除对血压检查的误解、增加获得血压检查服务的机会,以及利用社会规范、社会关系和可信赖来源的影响来提高参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Theoretical mapping of the barriers and enablers to having blood pressure checked among adults without a hypertension diagnosis: a systematic review and theoretical synthesis using behaviour change frameworks.

Identifying influences on engagement with blood pressure (BP) checks can assist with intervention design for hypertension detection. This systematic review searched four databases (Embase, Emcare, MEDLINE and Web of Science) for papers published from 2015 to 2023 (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023398002). Eligible studies reported influences on BP checks in community or primary care settings. Data were coded and mapped using the Action, Actor, Context, Target, Time framework and Behaviour Change Wheel. Analysis of 18 studies generated eight themes: (1) 'Difficult-to-use devices with no accessible information on how to use them' (2) 'Lack of awareness about hypertension and BP checks', (3) 'Stigma and disconnect with identity' (4) 'Beliefs about the value of BP checks', (5) 'Fear and uncertainty', (6) 'Lack of appropriate and comfortable local services' (7) 'Financial cost of engaging with BP check services' and (8) 'Social contacts or health professional recommended a check'. Knowledge, identity, emotions, social contacts and environmental factors are key behavioural influences on adults' engagement with BP checks. Potential intervention strategies include education on hypertension, addressing misconceptions about BP checks, increasing access to BP check services and harnessing the influence of social norms, social connections and trusted sources to improve engagement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Psychology Review
Health Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The publication of Health Psychology Review (HPR) marks a significant milestone in the field of health psychology, as it is the first review journal dedicated to this important and rapidly growing discipline. Edited by a highly respected team, HPR provides a critical platform for the review, development of theories, and conceptual advancements in health psychology. This prestigious international forum not only contributes to the progress of health psychology but also fosters its connection with the broader field of psychology and other related academic and professional domains. With its vital insights, HPR is a must-read for those involved in the study, teaching, and practice of health psychology, behavioral medicine, and related areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信