Sima Toopchiani, Shireen Sindi, Neil Poulter, Sujin Kang, Chi Udeh-Momoh, Geraint Price, Miia Kivipelto, Lefkos Middleton, Oliver Robinson
{"title":"一组伦敦老年人认知轨迹和实践效果的性别差异:风险因素的作用。","authors":"Sima Toopchiani, Shireen Sindi, Neil Poulter, Sujin Kang, Chi Udeh-Momoh, Geraint Price, Miia Kivipelto, Lefkos Middleton, Oliver Robinson","doi":"10.1177/13872877251339833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundSex differences in cognitive abilities have been reported; however, the underlying reasons remain unclear.ObjectiveTo (i) investigate sex differences in cognitive performance, (ii) evaluate the contributions of established dementia risk factors to these differences, and (iii) examine the role of non-modifiable risk factors on sex differences in cognitive performance.MethodsAmong 964 cognitively unimpaired participants (aged 60-85) of the UK CHARIOT-PRO Main Study, we assessed cross-sectional and longitudinal associations, over up to 3 years of follow-up, between sex and cognitive performance, using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS).ResultsSex differences, mostly favoring women were observed at baseline across almost all RBANS indices including the total scale (Cohen's d = 0.3, adjusted mean difference in score = -5.4, p < 0.001). Sex differences were observed in Practice effects (PEs), with men showing less PE in almost all cognitive domains including the total scale (adjusted 1.3, p = 0.002). Greater sex differences in PEs, were documented among the 'older' participants in two out of five cognitive domains including the immediate memory index (mean difference: older (69-85 years) group = -3.2, p = 0.002); younger (60-68 years) group = -0.8, p = 0.4). Sex differences were more pronounced among 'Apolipoprotein-Ꜫ4 -carriers' in three out of five domains including the total scale (mean difference in carriers = -2.6, p = 0.002); non-carriers = -0.7, p = 0.3).ConclusionsSex differences in cognition and PE were observed after adjusting for risk factors associated with Alzheimer's disease. Future studies should also consider the effects of sex on non-modifiable risk factors and PEs to identify potential 'masked' neuropathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"13872877251339833"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex differences in cognitive trajectories and practice effects in a cohort of older Londoners: The role of risk factors.\",\"authors\":\"Sima Toopchiani, Shireen Sindi, Neil Poulter, Sujin Kang, Chi Udeh-Momoh, Geraint Price, Miia Kivipelto, Lefkos Middleton, Oliver Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13872877251339833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundSex differences in cognitive abilities have been reported; however, the underlying reasons remain unclear.ObjectiveTo (i) investigate sex differences in cognitive performance, (ii) evaluate the contributions of established dementia risk factors to these differences, and (iii) examine the role of non-modifiable risk factors on sex differences in cognitive performance.MethodsAmong 964 cognitively unimpaired participants (aged 60-85) of the UK CHARIOT-PRO Main Study, we assessed cross-sectional and longitudinal associations, over up to 3 years of follow-up, between sex and cognitive performance, using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS).ResultsSex differences, mostly favoring women were observed at baseline across almost all RBANS indices including the total scale (Cohen's d = 0.3, adjusted mean difference in score = -5.4, p < 0.001). Sex differences were observed in Practice effects (PEs), with men showing less PE in almost all cognitive domains including the total scale (adjusted 1.3, p = 0.002). Greater sex differences in PEs, were documented among the 'older' participants in two out of five cognitive domains including the immediate memory index (mean difference: older (69-85 years) group = -3.2, p = 0.002); younger (60-68 years) group = -0.8, p = 0.4). Sex differences were more pronounced among 'Apolipoprotein-Ꜫ4 -carriers' in three out of five domains including the total scale (mean difference in carriers = -2.6, p = 0.002); non-carriers = -0.7, p = 0.3).ConclusionsSex differences in cognition and PE were observed after adjusting for risk factors associated with Alzheimer's disease. Future studies should also consider the effects of sex on non-modifiable risk factors and PEs to identify potential 'masked' neuropathology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13872877251339833\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251339833\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251339833","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
认知能力的性别差异已被报道;然而,根本原因尚不清楚。目的(i)调查认知表现的性别差异,(ii)评估已确定的痴呆风险因素对这些差异的贡献,以及(iii)检查不可改变的风险因素对认知表现性别差异的作用。方法在964名英国 - pro主要研究的认知未受损参与者(60-85岁)中,我们使用神经心理状态评估可重复电池(rban)评估性别与认知表现之间的横断面和纵向关联,随访时间长达3年。结果在包括总量表在内的几乎所有rban指数的基线上都观察到性别差异(Cohen’s d = 0.3,调整后的平均得分差异= -5.4,p
Sex differences in cognitive trajectories and practice effects in a cohort of older Londoners: The role of risk factors.
BackgroundSex differences in cognitive abilities have been reported; however, the underlying reasons remain unclear.ObjectiveTo (i) investigate sex differences in cognitive performance, (ii) evaluate the contributions of established dementia risk factors to these differences, and (iii) examine the role of non-modifiable risk factors on sex differences in cognitive performance.MethodsAmong 964 cognitively unimpaired participants (aged 60-85) of the UK CHARIOT-PRO Main Study, we assessed cross-sectional and longitudinal associations, over up to 3 years of follow-up, between sex and cognitive performance, using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS).ResultsSex differences, mostly favoring women were observed at baseline across almost all RBANS indices including the total scale (Cohen's d = 0.3, adjusted mean difference in score = -5.4, p < 0.001). Sex differences were observed in Practice effects (PEs), with men showing less PE in almost all cognitive domains including the total scale (adjusted 1.3, p = 0.002). Greater sex differences in PEs, were documented among the 'older' participants in two out of five cognitive domains including the immediate memory index (mean difference: older (69-85 years) group = -3.2, p = 0.002); younger (60-68 years) group = -0.8, p = 0.4). Sex differences were more pronounced among 'Apolipoprotein-Ꜫ4 -carriers' in three out of five domains including the total scale (mean difference in carriers = -2.6, p = 0.002); non-carriers = -0.7, p = 0.3).ConclusionsSex differences in cognition and PE were observed after adjusting for risk factors associated with Alzheimer's disease. Future studies should also consider the effects of sex on non-modifiable risk factors and PEs to identify potential 'masked' neuropathology.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.