一组伦敦老年人认知轨迹和实践效果的性别差异:风险因素的作用。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Sima Toopchiani, Shireen Sindi, Neil Poulter, Sujin Kang, Chi Udeh-Momoh, Geraint Price, Miia Kivipelto, Lefkos Middleton, Oliver Robinson
{"title":"一组伦敦老年人认知轨迹和实践效果的性别差异:风险因素的作用。","authors":"Sima Toopchiani, Shireen Sindi, Neil Poulter, Sujin Kang, Chi Udeh-Momoh, Geraint Price, Miia Kivipelto, Lefkos Middleton, Oliver Robinson","doi":"10.1177/13872877251339833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundSex differences in cognitive abilities have been reported; however, the underlying reasons remain unclear.ObjectiveTo (i) investigate sex differences in cognitive performance, (ii) evaluate the contributions of established dementia risk factors to these differences, and (iii) examine the role of non-modifiable risk factors on sex differences in cognitive performance.MethodsAmong 964 cognitively unimpaired participants (aged 60-85) of the UK CHARIOT-PRO Main Study, we assessed cross-sectional and longitudinal associations, over up to 3 years of follow-up, between sex and cognitive performance, using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS).ResultsSex differences, mostly favoring women were observed at baseline across almost all RBANS indices including the total scale (Cohen's d = 0.3, adjusted mean difference in score = -5.4, p < 0.001). Sex differences were observed in Practice effects (PEs), with men showing less PE in almost all cognitive domains including the total scale (adjusted 1.3, p = 0.002). Greater sex differences in PEs, were documented among the 'older' participants in two out of five cognitive domains including the immediate memory index (mean difference: older (69-85 years) group = -3.2, p = 0.002); younger (60-68 years) group = -0.8, p = 0.4). Sex differences were more pronounced among 'Apolipoprotein-Ꜫ4 -carriers' in three out of five domains including the total scale (mean difference in carriers = -2.6, p = 0.002); non-carriers = -0.7, p = 0.3).ConclusionsSex differences in cognition and PE were observed after adjusting for risk factors associated with Alzheimer's disease. Future studies should also consider the effects of sex on non-modifiable risk factors and PEs to identify potential 'masked' neuropathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"13872877251339833"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex differences in cognitive trajectories and practice effects in a cohort of older Londoners: The role of risk factors.\",\"authors\":\"Sima Toopchiani, Shireen Sindi, Neil Poulter, Sujin Kang, Chi Udeh-Momoh, Geraint Price, Miia Kivipelto, Lefkos Middleton, Oliver Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13872877251339833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundSex differences in cognitive abilities have been reported; however, the underlying reasons remain unclear.ObjectiveTo (i) investigate sex differences in cognitive performance, (ii) evaluate the contributions of established dementia risk factors to these differences, and (iii) examine the role of non-modifiable risk factors on sex differences in cognitive performance.MethodsAmong 964 cognitively unimpaired participants (aged 60-85) of the UK CHARIOT-PRO Main Study, we assessed cross-sectional and longitudinal associations, over up to 3 years of follow-up, between sex and cognitive performance, using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS).ResultsSex differences, mostly favoring women were observed at baseline across almost all RBANS indices including the total scale (Cohen's d = 0.3, adjusted mean difference in score = -5.4, p < 0.001). Sex differences were observed in Practice effects (PEs), with men showing less PE in almost all cognitive domains including the total scale (adjusted 1.3, p = 0.002). Greater sex differences in PEs, were documented among the 'older' participants in two out of five cognitive domains including the immediate memory index (mean difference: older (69-85 years) group = -3.2, p = 0.002); younger (60-68 years) group = -0.8, p = 0.4). Sex differences were more pronounced among 'Apolipoprotein-Ꜫ4 -carriers' in three out of five domains including the total scale (mean difference in carriers = -2.6, p = 0.002); non-carriers = -0.7, p = 0.3).ConclusionsSex differences in cognition and PE were observed after adjusting for risk factors associated with Alzheimer's disease. Future studies should also consider the effects of sex on non-modifiable risk factors and PEs to identify potential 'masked' neuropathology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13872877251339833\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251339833\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251339833","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认知能力的性别差异已被报道;然而,根本原因尚不清楚。目的(i)调查认知表现的性别差异,(ii)评估已确定的痴呆风险因素对这些差异的贡献,以及(iii)检查不可改变的风险因素对认知表现性别差异的作用。方法在964名英国 - pro主要研究的认知未受损参与者(60-85岁)中,我们使用神经心理状态评估可重复电池(rban)评估性别与认知表现之间的横断面和纵向关联,随访时间长达3年。结果在包括总量表在内的几乎所有rban指数的基线上都观察到性别差异(Cohen’s d = 0.3,调整后的平均得分差异= -5.4,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sex differences in cognitive trajectories and practice effects in a cohort of older Londoners: The role of risk factors.

BackgroundSex differences in cognitive abilities have been reported; however, the underlying reasons remain unclear.ObjectiveTo (i) investigate sex differences in cognitive performance, (ii) evaluate the contributions of established dementia risk factors to these differences, and (iii) examine the role of non-modifiable risk factors on sex differences in cognitive performance.MethodsAmong 964 cognitively unimpaired participants (aged 60-85) of the UK CHARIOT-PRO Main Study, we assessed cross-sectional and longitudinal associations, over up to 3 years of follow-up, between sex and cognitive performance, using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS).ResultsSex differences, mostly favoring women were observed at baseline across almost all RBANS indices including the total scale (Cohen's d = 0.3, adjusted mean difference in score = -5.4, p < 0.001). Sex differences were observed in Practice effects (PEs), with men showing less PE in almost all cognitive domains including the total scale (adjusted 1.3, p = 0.002). Greater sex differences in PEs, were documented among the 'older' participants in two out of five cognitive domains including the immediate memory index (mean difference: older (69-85 years) group = -3.2, p = 0.002); younger (60-68 years) group = -0.8, p = 0.4). Sex differences were more pronounced among 'Apolipoprotein-Ꜫ4 -carriers' in three out of five domains including the total scale (mean difference in carriers = -2.6, p = 0.002); non-carriers = -0.7, p = 0.3).ConclusionsSex differences in cognition and PE were observed after adjusting for risk factors associated with Alzheimer's disease. Future studies should also consider the effects of sex on non-modifiable risk factors and PEs to identify potential 'masked' neuropathology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信