与液相色谱-高分辨率串联质谱法相比,侧流免疫法检测人尿中的阿曲霉毒素。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Aline C Vollmer, Thomas P Bambauer, Candace B Bever, Christina C Tam, Lea Wagmann, Markus R Meyer
{"title":"与液相色谱-高分辨率串联质谱法相比,侧流免疫法检测人尿中的阿曲霉毒素。","authors":"Aline C Vollmer, Thomas P Bambauer, Candace B Bever, Christina C Tam, Lea Wagmann, Markus R Meyer","doi":"10.1093/jat/bkaf018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Amatoxin-containing mushrooms, which contribute to many intoxications each year are of particular interest for clinicians and toxicologists as patients require special treatment in hospital. To confirm the presence of amatoxins, approaches for their fast, sensitive, and reliable identification must be available. Solid-phase extraction followed by liquid chromatography-high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS/MS) is widely applied for analysis of amatoxins as this combination provides suitable sensitivity, specificity, and mass accuracy. Nevertheless, time-consuming preparatory steps as well as expensive equipment is required. Therefore, a lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) for trace detection of α-, β-, and γ-amanitin was established and evaluated using dog urine. In this study, we answered the questions whether this LFIA can be transferred to human urine samples, and whether this LFIA can be used as a supporting tool prior to LC-HRMS/MS confirmation. Result interpretation by eye and using digitally-acquired pixel intensity ratios was investigated with respect to analytical sensitivity. The LFIA detects amatoxins in human urine after visual evaluation to as little as 5 ng/mL (α-amanitin - 10 ng/mL, β-amanitin - 50 ng/mL, γ-amanitin - 5 ng/mL). After digital analysis, pixel intensity ratios were determined to evaluate the LFIA as positive, negative, or trace result. Detection limits were redefined ranging from 1 ng/mL (α- and γ-amanitin) to 3 ng/mL (β-amanitin). For the proof-of-concept, 73 human urine samples submitted to the authors´ laboratory for toxicological analysis were analyzed using the LFIA and LC-HRMS/MS. Only three out of 73 urine samples were tested false positive with the LFIA as LC-HRMS/MS confirmation revealed no detection of amatoxins. Sixteen urine samples were evaluated as trace results and confirmed negative using LC-HRMS/MS except for one case which was positive for α-amanitin but negative for β-amanitin. Although particularly positive and trace results of the LFIA still need to be confirmed, the negative LFIA results correlated well with LC-HRMS/MS.</p>","PeriodicalId":14905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lateral flow immunoassay for amatoxins detection in human urine compared to liquid chromatography-high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry.\",\"authors\":\"Aline C Vollmer, Thomas P Bambauer, Candace B Bever, Christina C Tam, Lea Wagmann, Markus R Meyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jat/bkaf018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Amatoxin-containing mushrooms, which contribute to many intoxications each year are of particular interest for clinicians and toxicologists as patients require special treatment in hospital. To confirm the presence of amatoxins, approaches for their fast, sensitive, and reliable identification must be available. Solid-phase extraction followed by liquid chromatography-high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS/MS) is widely applied for analysis of amatoxins as this combination provides suitable sensitivity, specificity, and mass accuracy. Nevertheless, time-consuming preparatory steps as well as expensive equipment is required. Therefore, a lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) for trace detection of α-, β-, and γ-amanitin was established and evaluated using dog urine. In this study, we answered the questions whether this LFIA can be transferred to human urine samples, and whether this LFIA can be used as a supporting tool prior to LC-HRMS/MS confirmation. Result interpretation by eye and using digitally-acquired pixel intensity ratios was investigated with respect to analytical sensitivity. The LFIA detects amatoxins in human urine after visual evaluation to as little as 5 ng/mL (α-amanitin - 10 ng/mL, β-amanitin - 50 ng/mL, γ-amanitin - 5 ng/mL). After digital analysis, pixel intensity ratios were determined to evaluate the LFIA as positive, negative, or trace result. Detection limits were redefined ranging from 1 ng/mL (α- and γ-amanitin) to 3 ng/mL (β-amanitin). For the proof-of-concept, 73 human urine samples submitted to the authors´ laboratory for toxicological analysis were analyzed using the LFIA and LC-HRMS/MS. Only three out of 73 urine samples were tested false positive with the LFIA as LC-HRMS/MS confirmation revealed no detection of amatoxins. Sixteen urine samples were evaluated as trace results and confirmed negative using LC-HRMS/MS except for one case which was positive for α-amanitin but negative for β-amanitin. Although particularly positive and trace results of the LFIA still need to be confirmed, the negative LFIA results correlated well with LC-HRMS/MS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of analytical toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of analytical toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkaf018\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkaf018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

含有阿马特毒素的蘑菇,每年都会导致许多中毒,这是临床医生和毒理学家特别感兴趣的,因为病人需要在医院接受特殊治疗。为了确认马曲霉毒素的存在,必须有快速、灵敏和可靠的鉴定方法。固相萃取-液相色谱-高分辨率串联质谱法(LC-HRMS/MS)因其具有良好的灵敏度、特异性和质量准确性而被广泛应用于阿马特毒素的分析。然而,需要耗时的准备步骤和昂贵的设备。因此,本研究建立了犬尿中微量α-、β-和γ-amanitin的侧流免疫分析法(LFIA)。在本研究中,我们回答了该LFIA是否可以转移到人尿样本中,以及该LFIA是否可以作为LC-HRMS/MS确认之前的辅助工具。结果解释的眼睛和使用数字获得的像素强度比进行了研究,相对于分析灵敏度。经目测,LFIA在人尿中检测出低至5 ng/mL的amatoxins (α-amanitin - 10 ng/mL, β-amanitin - 50 ng/mL, γ-amanitin - 5 ng/mL)。经过数字分析,确定像素强度比来评估LFIA为阳性,阴性或痕量结果。重新定义了检出限为1 ng/mL (α-和γ-amanitin)至3 ng/mL (β-amanitin)。为了进行概念验证,我们使用LFIA和LC-HRMS/MS对提交给作者实验室进行毒理学分析的73份人类尿液样本进行了分析。由于LC-HRMS/MS确认未检测到阿马特毒素,73份尿样中只有3份被LFIA检测为假阳性。16份尿样经LC-HRMS/MS鉴定为微量结果,除1例α-amanitin阳性,β-amanitin阴性外,其余均为阴性。虽然LFIA的特别阳性和痕量结果仍有待确认,但LFIA阴性结果与LC-HRMS/MS具有良好的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lateral flow immunoassay for amatoxins detection in human urine compared to liquid chromatography-high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry.

Amatoxin-containing mushrooms, which contribute to many intoxications each year are of particular interest for clinicians and toxicologists as patients require special treatment in hospital. To confirm the presence of amatoxins, approaches for their fast, sensitive, and reliable identification must be available. Solid-phase extraction followed by liquid chromatography-high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS/MS) is widely applied for analysis of amatoxins as this combination provides suitable sensitivity, specificity, and mass accuracy. Nevertheless, time-consuming preparatory steps as well as expensive equipment is required. Therefore, a lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) for trace detection of α-, β-, and γ-amanitin was established and evaluated using dog urine. In this study, we answered the questions whether this LFIA can be transferred to human urine samples, and whether this LFIA can be used as a supporting tool prior to LC-HRMS/MS confirmation. Result interpretation by eye and using digitally-acquired pixel intensity ratios was investigated with respect to analytical sensitivity. The LFIA detects amatoxins in human urine after visual evaluation to as little as 5 ng/mL (α-amanitin - 10 ng/mL, β-amanitin - 50 ng/mL, γ-amanitin - 5 ng/mL). After digital analysis, pixel intensity ratios were determined to evaluate the LFIA as positive, negative, or trace result. Detection limits were redefined ranging from 1 ng/mL (α- and γ-amanitin) to 3 ng/mL (β-amanitin). For the proof-of-concept, 73 human urine samples submitted to the authors´ laboratory for toxicological analysis were analyzed using the LFIA and LC-HRMS/MS. Only three out of 73 urine samples were tested false positive with the LFIA as LC-HRMS/MS confirmation revealed no detection of amatoxins. Sixteen urine samples were evaluated as trace results and confirmed negative using LC-HRMS/MS except for one case which was positive for α-amanitin but negative for β-amanitin. Although particularly positive and trace results of the LFIA still need to be confirmed, the negative LFIA results correlated well with LC-HRMS/MS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Analytical Toxicology (JAT) is an international toxicology journal devoted to the timely dissemination of scientific communications concerning potentially toxic substances and drug identification, isolation, and quantitation. Since its inception in 1977, the Journal of Analytical Toxicology has striven to present state-of-the-art techniques used in toxicology labs. The peer-review process provided by the distinguished members of the Editorial Advisory Board ensures the high-quality and integrity of articles published in the Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Timely presentation of the latest toxicology developments is ensured through Technical Notes, Case Reports, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信