打开第二语言新隐喻加工:来自第一和第二语言英语使用者的行为和ERP洞察。

IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Adriana R Miller, Rafał Jończyk, Holly A Zaharchuk, Janet G van Hell
{"title":"打开第二语言新隐喻加工:来自第一和第二语言英语使用者的行为和ERP洞察。","authors":"Adriana R Miller, Rafał Jończyk, Holly A Zaharchuk, Janet G van Hell","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A growing literature uses event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate novel metaphor processing as a window into creative processes like conceptual expansion. Modulations of the N400 generally indicate that while novel metaphors are initially processed as semantic anomalies, after a connection is found relating the concepts, they pattern more with literal sentences. Existing research largely focuses on monolinguals, but less is known about novel metaphor processing in bilinguals' second language (L2). Here, we combine robust single-trial ERPs and behavioral measures to investigate how L2 English users process full-sentence novel metaphors. We compare our results to a previous study with English monolinguals using the same experimental design to test three competing hypotheses: L2 conceptual expansion will be more effortful than, more efficient than, or similar to L1. Group differences suggest more effortful processing for L2 English users than monolinguals. Behaviorally, L2 users show more sentence evaluation errors than monolinguals, particularly for anomalous sentences. ERP results in L2 users reveal an N400 semantic anomaly effect at the sentence-final position, with no significant differences between metaphorical and literal or metaphorical and anomalous sentences. Monolinguals show a graded N400 effect, with significant differences between literal and anomalous as well as metaphorical and anomalous sentences. By comparing L2 users' results with monolingual English users and using naturalistic full-sentence structures, our findings contribute to the emergent literature on L2 novel metaphor processing and conceptual expansion while also unraveling the cognitive challenges associated with incremental processing and integration of L2 metaphorical sentences.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"62 5","pages":"e70066"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063520/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unlocking Second Language Novel Metaphor Processing: Behavioral and ERP Insights From First and Second-Language English Users.\",\"authors\":\"Adriana R Miller, Rafał Jończyk, Holly A Zaharchuk, Janet G van Hell\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/psyp.70066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A growing literature uses event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate novel metaphor processing as a window into creative processes like conceptual expansion. Modulations of the N400 generally indicate that while novel metaphors are initially processed as semantic anomalies, after a connection is found relating the concepts, they pattern more with literal sentences. Existing research largely focuses on monolinguals, but less is known about novel metaphor processing in bilinguals' second language (L2). Here, we combine robust single-trial ERPs and behavioral measures to investigate how L2 English users process full-sentence novel metaphors. We compare our results to a previous study with English monolinguals using the same experimental design to test three competing hypotheses: L2 conceptual expansion will be more effortful than, more efficient than, or similar to L1. Group differences suggest more effortful processing for L2 English users than monolinguals. Behaviorally, L2 users show more sentence evaluation errors than monolinguals, particularly for anomalous sentences. ERP results in L2 users reveal an N400 semantic anomaly effect at the sentence-final position, with no significant differences between metaphorical and literal or metaphorical and anomalous sentences. Monolinguals show a graded N400 effect, with significant differences between literal and anomalous as well as metaphorical and anomalous sentences. By comparing L2 users' results with monolingual English users and using naturalistic full-sentence structures, our findings contribute to the emergent literature on L2 novel metaphor processing and conceptual expansion while also unraveling the cognitive challenges associated with incremental processing and integration of L2 metaphorical sentences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychophysiology\",\"volume\":\"62 5\",\"pages\":\"e70066\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063520/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70066\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70066","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的文献使用事件相关电位(erp)来研究新的隐喻处理,作为概念扩展等创造性过程的窗口。N400的变化通常表明,虽然新隐喻最初被处理为语义异常,但在发现与概念相关的联系后,它们更多地与字面句子形成模式。现有的研究主要集中在单语者身上,但对双语者第二语言中的新隐喻加工却知之甚少。在这里,我们结合强大的单试验erp和行为测量来调查二语英语用户如何处理完整句子的新隐喻。我们将我们的结果与先前对英语单语者的研究进行比较,使用相同的实验设计来测试三个相互竞争的假设:第二语言的概念扩展将比第一语言更努力,比第一语言更有效,或类似。群体差异表明,第二语言英语使用者比单语使用者更努力地处理信息。在行为上,第二语言使用者比单语使用者表现出更多的句子评价错误,特别是对于异常句子。二语使用者的ERP结果显示,在句末位置存在N400语义异常效应,隐喻句与字面句、隐喻句与异常句之间无显著差异。单语者表现出分级的N400效应,在字面句和异常句以及隐喻句和异常句之间存在显著差异。通过比较二语使用者和单语英语使用者的结果,并使用自然主义的完整句子结构,我们的研究结果有助于二语新隐喻加工和概念扩展的新兴文献,同时也揭示了二语隐喻句子增量加工和整合相关的认知挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unlocking Second Language Novel Metaphor Processing: Behavioral and ERP Insights From First and Second-Language English Users.

A growing literature uses event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate novel metaphor processing as a window into creative processes like conceptual expansion. Modulations of the N400 generally indicate that while novel metaphors are initially processed as semantic anomalies, after a connection is found relating the concepts, they pattern more with literal sentences. Existing research largely focuses on monolinguals, but less is known about novel metaphor processing in bilinguals' second language (L2). Here, we combine robust single-trial ERPs and behavioral measures to investigate how L2 English users process full-sentence novel metaphors. We compare our results to a previous study with English monolinguals using the same experimental design to test three competing hypotheses: L2 conceptual expansion will be more effortful than, more efficient than, or similar to L1. Group differences suggest more effortful processing for L2 English users than monolinguals. Behaviorally, L2 users show more sentence evaluation errors than monolinguals, particularly for anomalous sentences. ERP results in L2 users reveal an N400 semantic anomaly effect at the sentence-final position, with no significant differences between metaphorical and literal or metaphorical and anomalous sentences. Monolinguals show a graded N400 effect, with significant differences between literal and anomalous as well as metaphorical and anomalous sentences. By comparing L2 users' results with monolingual English users and using naturalistic full-sentence structures, our findings contribute to the emergent literature on L2 novel metaphor processing and conceptual expansion while also unraveling the cognitive challenges associated with incremental processing and integration of L2 metaphorical sentences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychophysiology
Psychophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
225
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信