紧急法律准备和反应：美国最高法院的影响。

IF 2.1 4区医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH

Health Security Pub Date : 2025-04-25 DOI:10.1089/hs.2024.0084

James G Hodge, Jennifer L Piatt

{"title":"紧急法律准备和反应：美国最高法院的影响。","authors":"James G Hodge, Jennifer L Piatt","doi":"10.1089/hs.2024.0084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"US Supreme Court opinions from the inception of the COVID-19 pandemic to date are reshaping national and subnational abilities to respond to public health emergencies. Substantial impacts in emergency legal preparedness and response arise in multiple legal areas including: (1) federal executive authorities; (2) access to health services and emergency care; (3) public health emergency interventions and mandates; (4) race-based limitations in resource allocations; (5) misinformation; and (6) scope of liability during and after emergencies. Against this backdrop an array of legal options and critical takeaways may help mitigate the impacts of US Supreme Court opinions and advance effective emergency responses ahead.","PeriodicalId":12955,"journal":{"name":"Health Security","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency Legal Preparedness and Response: United States Supreme Court Impacts.\",\"authors\":\"James G Hodge, Jennifer L Piatt\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/hs.2024.0084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"US Supreme Court opinions from the inception of the COVID-19 pandemic to date are reshaping national and subnational abilities to respond to public health emergencies. Substantial impacts in emergency legal preparedness and response arise in multiple legal areas including: (1) federal executive authorities; (2) access to health services and emergency care; (3) public health emergency interventions and mandates; (4) race-based limitations in resource allocations; (5) misinformation; and (6) scope of liability during and after emergencies. Against this backdrop an array of legal options and critical takeaways may help mitigate the impacts of US Supreme Court opinions and advance effective emergency responses ahead.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Security\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2024.0084\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Security","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2024.0084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

从2019冠状病毒病大流行开始至今，美国最高法院的意见正在重塑国家和地方应对突发公共卫生事件的能力。紧急情况的法律准备和应对在多个法律领域产生重大影响，包括：(1)联邦行政当局；(2)获得保健服务和紧急护理；(3)突发公共卫生事件干预措施和任务；(4)基于种族的资源分配限制；(5)错误信息;（六）突发事件期间和之后的责任范围。在这种背景下，一系列法律选择和关键要点可能有助于减轻美国最高法院意见的影响，并促进未来有效的应急反应。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Emergency Legal Preparedness and Response: United States Supreme Court Impacts.

US Supreme Court opinions from the inception of the COVID-19 pandemic to date are reshaping national and subnational abilities to respond to public health emergencies. Substantial impacts in emergency legal preparedness and response arise in multiple legal areas including: (1) federal executive authorities; (2) access to health services and emergency care; (3) public health emergency interventions and mandates; (4) race-based limitations in resource allocations; (5) misinformation; and (6) scope of liability during and after emergencies. Against this backdrop an array of legal options and critical takeaways may help mitigate the impacts of US Supreme Court opinions and advance effective emergency responses ahead.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Health Security PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-

CiteScore

4.80

自引率

6.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Health Security is a peer-reviewed journal providing research and essential guidance for the protection of people’s health before and after epidemics or disasters and for ensuring that communities are resilient to major challenges. The Journal explores the issues posed by disease outbreaks and epidemics; natural disasters; biological, chemical, and nuclear accidents or deliberate threats; foodborne outbreaks; and other health emergencies. It offers important insight into how to develop the systems needed to meet these challenges. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, Health Security covers research, innovations, methods, challenges, and ethical and legal dilemmas facing scientific, military, and health organizations. The Journal is a key resource for practitioners in these fields, policymakers, scientific experts, and government officials.