初级保健护士结构化档案的经验:一项质性访谈研究。

IF 2.2 Q1 NURSING
Global Qualitative Nursing Research Pub Date : 2025-04-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23333936251330684
Anna Dalsten Hjort, Tora Hammar, Karin Myrberg
{"title":"初级保健护士结构化档案的经验:一项质性访谈研究。","authors":"Anna Dalsten Hjort, Tora Hammar, Karin Myrberg","doi":"10.1177/23333936251330684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healthcare is undergoing an unprecedented technological transition to structured documentation in electronic health records (EHR), which has the potential to increase the quality of documentation. However, given the rising demand for direct transfer of data, there is a risk that requirements for more documentation will follow. This study seeks to investigate primary care nurses' experiences of structured documentation with direct transfer to a national quality registry. Nine primary care nurses using structured documentation in their management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients were recruited from different Swedish regions. The semi-structured interviews addressed experiences and work procedures when using a structured documentation template with direct data transfer to a quality register. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Data were framed according to five key concepts; patient safety, time-saving work methods, quality of care, equitable care, and professional autonomy. The nurses experienced some barriers in relation to structured documentation but mainly observed benefits, raising the potential to enhance equitable care and safety for patients with COPD in primary care. Professional experience and autonomy were described as important prerequisites in achieving these benefits. The findings from this study can contribute to strengthening the documentation work procedures of nurses.</p>","PeriodicalId":45940,"journal":{"name":"Global Qualitative Nursing Research","volume":"12 ","pages":"23333936251330684"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12033446/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primary Care Nurses' Experiences of Structured Documentation: A Qualitative Interview Study.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Dalsten Hjort, Tora Hammar, Karin Myrberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23333936251330684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Healthcare is undergoing an unprecedented technological transition to structured documentation in electronic health records (EHR), which has the potential to increase the quality of documentation. However, given the rising demand for direct transfer of data, there is a risk that requirements for more documentation will follow. This study seeks to investigate primary care nurses' experiences of structured documentation with direct transfer to a national quality registry. Nine primary care nurses using structured documentation in their management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients were recruited from different Swedish regions. The semi-structured interviews addressed experiences and work procedures when using a structured documentation template with direct data transfer to a quality register. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Data were framed according to five key concepts; patient safety, time-saving work methods, quality of care, equitable care, and professional autonomy. The nurses experienced some barriers in relation to structured documentation but mainly observed benefits, raising the potential to enhance equitable care and safety for patients with COPD in primary care. Professional experience and autonomy were described as important prerequisites in achieving these benefits. The findings from this study can contribute to strengthening the documentation work procedures of nurses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Qualitative Nursing Research\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"23333936251330684\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12033446/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Qualitative Nursing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23333936251330684\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Qualitative Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23333936251330684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医疗保健正在经历一场前所未有的技术转型,向电子健康记录(EHR)中的结构化文档过渡,这有可能提高文档的质量。但是,由于对直接传输数据的需求不断增加,因此有可能需要更多的文件。本研究旨在调查初级保健护士直接转移到国家质量登记处的结构化文件的经验。从瑞典不同地区招募了9名使用结构化文件管理慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的初级保健护士。当使用结构化文档模板并将数据直接传输到质量登记处时,半结构化访谈涉及经验和工作程序。访谈被逐字记录下来,并使用定性内容分析进行分析。数据是根据五个关键概念构建的;患者安全、节省时间的工作方法、护理质量、公平护理和专业自主。护士在结构化文件方面遇到了一些障碍,但主要是观察到益处,这提高了在初级保健中加强COPD患者公平护理和安全的潜力。专业经验和自主性被认为是实现这些好处的重要先决条件。本研究结果有助于加强护士的档案工作程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Primary Care Nurses' Experiences of Structured Documentation: A Qualitative Interview Study.

Healthcare is undergoing an unprecedented technological transition to structured documentation in electronic health records (EHR), which has the potential to increase the quality of documentation. However, given the rising demand for direct transfer of data, there is a risk that requirements for more documentation will follow. This study seeks to investigate primary care nurses' experiences of structured documentation with direct transfer to a national quality registry. Nine primary care nurses using structured documentation in their management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients were recruited from different Swedish regions. The semi-structured interviews addressed experiences and work procedures when using a structured documentation template with direct data transfer to a quality register. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Data were framed according to five key concepts; patient safety, time-saving work methods, quality of care, equitable care, and professional autonomy. The nurses experienced some barriers in relation to structured documentation but mainly observed benefits, raising the potential to enhance equitable care and safety for patients with COPD in primary care. Professional experience and autonomy were described as important prerequisites in achieving these benefits. The findings from this study can contribute to strengthening the documentation work procedures of nurses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
41
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Qualitative Nursing Research (GQNR) is a ground breaking, international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on qualitative research in fields relevant to nursing and other health professionals world-wide. The journal specializes in topics related to nursing practice, responses to health and illness, health promotion, and health care delivery. GQNR will publish research articles using qualitative methods and qualitatively-driven mixed-method designs as well as meta-syntheses and articles focused on methodological development. Special sections include Ethics, Methodological Development, Advancing Theory/Metasynthesis, Establishing Evidence, and Application to Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信