心理测量评估创伤相关大麻使用应对的新措施。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Sage E Hawn, Terrell A Hicks, Christopher Latourrette, Anita Thomas, Daniela Chaname, Sarah Ehlke, Abigail Powers Lott
{"title":"心理测量评估创伤相关大麻使用应对的新措施。","authors":"Sage E Hawn, Terrell A Hicks, Christopher Latourrette, Anita Thomas, Daniela Chaname, Sarah Ehlke, Abigail Powers Lott","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2025.2500141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and cannabis use disorder (CUD) are commonly comorbid and are associated with many negative public health outcomes. One plausible explanation for this comorbidity comes from a self-medication framework, which suggests people use cannabis to cope with PTSD symptoms. Despite theoretical and empirical evidence for PTSD-related cannabis use to cope, no measure of this construct exists.<b>Objective:</b> We sought to address this gap by developing and validating a novel measure of PTSD-specific cannabis self-medication, which we have termed the Trauma-Related Cannabis Use to Cope (TRCU) questionnaire.<b>Method:</b> The psychometric properties of the TRCU and how it relates to relevant constructs were examined among a diverse sample of 345 trauma-exposed undergraduate cannabis users (<i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 22.19, <i>SD</i> = 6.45; 46.7% White; 79.7% woman-identifying) using structural equation modelling in Mplus.<b>Results:</b> Study findings indicate that the TRCU is a more precise and targeted measure of cannabis use to cope with PTSD symptomology, as compared to existing measures of cannabis coping motives. Furthermore, our data support the use of the TRCU as a four-factor scale, assessing cannabis use to cope with the four <i>DSM-5</i> PTSD symptom clusters (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>(164) = 257.83, <i>p</i> < .001; CFI = .969; TLI = .965; RMSEA = .041). We also found strong evidence supporting the construct and criterion validity of the TRCU, specifically in relation to PTSD symptoms, cannabis use, and cannabis-related issues and dependence.<b>Conclusions:</b> Results support the use of the TRCU in future self-medication research and as a clinically useful screening tool for identifying individuals with PTSD who are at risk for developing CUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"16 1","pages":"2500141"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12077481/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric evaluation of a novel measure of trauma-related cannabis use to cope.\",\"authors\":\"Sage E Hawn, Terrell A Hicks, Christopher Latourrette, Anita Thomas, Daniela Chaname, Sarah Ehlke, Abigail Powers Lott\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20008066.2025.2500141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and cannabis use disorder (CUD) are commonly comorbid and are associated with many negative public health outcomes. One plausible explanation for this comorbidity comes from a self-medication framework, which suggests people use cannabis to cope with PTSD symptoms. Despite theoretical and empirical evidence for PTSD-related cannabis use to cope, no measure of this construct exists.<b>Objective:</b> We sought to address this gap by developing and validating a novel measure of PTSD-specific cannabis self-medication, which we have termed the Trauma-Related Cannabis Use to Cope (TRCU) questionnaire.<b>Method:</b> The psychometric properties of the TRCU and how it relates to relevant constructs were examined among a diverse sample of 345 trauma-exposed undergraduate cannabis users (<i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 22.19, <i>SD</i> = 6.45; 46.7% White; 79.7% woman-identifying) using structural equation modelling in Mplus.<b>Results:</b> Study findings indicate that the TRCU is a more precise and targeted measure of cannabis use to cope with PTSD symptomology, as compared to existing measures of cannabis coping motives. Furthermore, our data support the use of the TRCU as a four-factor scale, assessing cannabis use to cope with the four <i>DSM-5</i> PTSD symptom clusters (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>(164) = 257.83, <i>p</i> < .001; CFI = .969; TLI = .965; RMSEA = .041). We also found strong evidence supporting the construct and criterion validity of the TRCU, specifically in relation to PTSD symptoms, cannabis use, and cannabis-related issues and dependence.<b>Conclusions:</b> Results support the use of the TRCU in future self-medication research and as a clinically useful screening tool for identifying individuals with PTSD who are at risk for developing CUD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Psychotraumatology\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"2500141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12077481/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Psychotraumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2500141\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2500141","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和大麻使用障碍(CUD)通常是合并症,并与许多负面的公共卫生结果相关。对这种共病的一种合理解释来自自我用药框架,该框架建议人们使用大麻来应对创伤后应激障碍症状。尽管理论和经验证据表明使用大麻可以应对创伤后应激障碍,但没有这种结构的测量存在。目的:我们试图通过开发和验证一种针对创伤后应激障碍的大麻自我药物治疗的新措施来解决这一差距,我们称之为创伤相关大麻使用应对(TRCU)问卷。方法:对345名创伤暴露大学生大麻使用者的心理测量特征及其与相关构念的关系进行研究(Mage = 22.19, SD = 6.45;46.7%的白人;79.7%女性识别),在Mplus中使用结构方程模型。结果:研究结果表明,与现有的大麻应对动机措施相比,TRCU是一种更精确和有针对性的大麻使用应对PTSD症状的措施。此外,我们的数据支持使用TRCU作为四因素量表,评估大麻使用对应对DSM-5中四个PTSD症状簇的影响(χ2(164) = 257.83, p)。结论:结果支持在未来的自我用药研究中使用TRCU,并作为临床有用的筛查工具,用于识别有发生CUD风险的PTSD患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychometric evaluation of a novel measure of trauma-related cannabis use to cope.

Background: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and cannabis use disorder (CUD) are commonly comorbid and are associated with many negative public health outcomes. One plausible explanation for this comorbidity comes from a self-medication framework, which suggests people use cannabis to cope with PTSD symptoms. Despite theoretical and empirical evidence for PTSD-related cannabis use to cope, no measure of this construct exists.Objective: We sought to address this gap by developing and validating a novel measure of PTSD-specific cannabis self-medication, which we have termed the Trauma-Related Cannabis Use to Cope (TRCU) questionnaire.Method: The psychometric properties of the TRCU and how it relates to relevant constructs were examined among a diverse sample of 345 trauma-exposed undergraduate cannabis users (Mage = 22.19, SD = 6.45; 46.7% White; 79.7% woman-identifying) using structural equation modelling in Mplus.Results: Study findings indicate that the TRCU is a more precise and targeted measure of cannabis use to cope with PTSD symptomology, as compared to existing measures of cannabis coping motives. Furthermore, our data support the use of the TRCU as a four-factor scale, assessing cannabis use to cope with the four DSM-5 PTSD symptom clusters (χ2(164) = 257.83, p < .001; CFI = .969; TLI = .965; RMSEA = .041). We also found strong evidence supporting the construct and criterion validity of the TRCU, specifically in relation to PTSD symptoms, cannabis use, and cannabis-related issues and dependence.Conclusions: Results support the use of the TRCU in future self-medication research and as a clinically useful screening tool for identifying individuals with PTSD who are at risk for developing CUD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信