接受癌症治疗的儿童和青少年的监督体育活动干预:一项系统综述。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Nadja Battanta, Krystyna Lange, Sabine V Kesting, Daniela Marx-Berger, Philip Heesen, Hannah Ober, Aron Onerup, Saskia M F Pluijm, Eva Scheler, Emma J Verwaaijen, Katrin Scheinemann, Maria Otth
{"title":"接受癌症治疗的儿童和青少年的监督体育活动干预:一项系统综述。","authors":"Nadja Battanta, Krystyna Lange, Sabine V Kesting, Daniela Marx-Berger, Philip Heesen, Hannah Ober, Aron Onerup, Saskia M F Pluijm, Eva Scheler, Emma J Verwaaijen, Katrin Scheinemann, Maria Otth","doi":"10.3390/curroncol32040234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> A cancer diagnosis and its treatment often disrupt a child's and adolescent's normal level of physical activity, which plays a vital role in their development and health. They are therefore often less physically active during treatment than before the diagnosis or compared to healthy peers. Today, there is no comprehensive overview of the safety, feasibility, clinical effectiveness, and potentially long-lasting impact of physical activity (PA) interventions in this population. <i>Methods:</i> We conducted a systematic review in PubMed according to PRISMA guidelines to evaluate studies on PA interventions during cancer treatment in children and adolescents up to 25 years of age. We used the Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tools to assess the risk of bias. Due to the heterogeneity in interventions and outcomes, we used descriptive approaches only to present the results. <i>Results</i>: Half of the 21 included studies were randomized controlled trials (10/21). PA interventions were found to be safe and feasible when tailored to the patient's age, treatment phase, and clinical condition. Most studies reported improvements in physical fitness, strength, and quality of life, with some reductions in fatigue. Variability in interventions and outcomes, along with small sample sizes and heterogeneous patient populations, made it difficult to draw clear conclusions. <i>Conclusions</i>: PA appears to be a feasible and, in terms of injuries, safe adjunct to cancer treatment in children and adolescents. Despite promising trends, further large-scale, multicenter trials with standardized protocols are needed to better establish the long-term benefits and optimal interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"32 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12025492/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supervised Physical Activity Interventions in Children and Adolescents with Cancer Undergoing Treatment-A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Nadja Battanta, Krystyna Lange, Sabine V Kesting, Daniela Marx-Berger, Philip Heesen, Hannah Ober, Aron Onerup, Saskia M F Pluijm, Eva Scheler, Emma J Verwaaijen, Katrin Scheinemann, Maria Otth\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol32040234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background:</i> A cancer diagnosis and its treatment often disrupt a child's and adolescent's normal level of physical activity, which plays a vital role in their development and health. They are therefore often less physically active during treatment than before the diagnosis or compared to healthy peers. Today, there is no comprehensive overview of the safety, feasibility, clinical effectiveness, and potentially long-lasting impact of physical activity (PA) interventions in this population. <i>Methods:</i> We conducted a systematic review in PubMed according to PRISMA guidelines to evaluate studies on PA interventions during cancer treatment in children and adolescents up to 25 years of age. We used the Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tools to assess the risk of bias. Due to the heterogeneity in interventions and outcomes, we used descriptive approaches only to present the results. <i>Results</i>: Half of the 21 included studies were randomized controlled trials (10/21). PA interventions were found to be safe and feasible when tailored to the patient's age, treatment phase, and clinical condition. Most studies reported improvements in physical fitness, strength, and quality of life, with some reductions in fatigue. Variability in interventions and outcomes, along with small sample sizes and heterogeneous patient populations, made it difficult to draw clear conclusions. <i>Conclusions</i>: PA appears to be a feasible and, in terms of injuries, safe adjunct to cancer treatment in children and adolescents. Despite promising trends, further large-scale, multicenter trials with standardized protocols are needed to better establish the long-term benefits and optimal interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12025492/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32040234\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32040234","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:癌症的诊断和治疗通常会破坏儿童和青少年正常的体育活动水平,而体育活动对他们的发育和健康起着至关重要的作用。因此,他们在治疗期间的体力活动往往少于诊断前或与健康同龄人相比。目前,还没有关于体育活动(PA)干预在这一人群中的安全性、可行性、临床有效性和潜在持久影响的全面概述。方法:我们根据PRISMA指南在PubMed上进行了一项系统综述,以评估25岁以下儿童和青少年癌症治疗期间PA干预的研究。我们使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的关键评估工具来评估偏见的风险。由于干预措施和结果的异质性,我们仅使用描述性方法来呈现结果。结果:21项纳入的研究中有一半为随机对照试验(10/21)。当根据患者的年龄、治疗阶段和临床状况进行调整时,发现PA干预是安全可行的。大多数研究报告了身体健康、力量和生活质量的改善,疲劳有所减轻。干预措施和结果的可变性,以及小样本量和异质患者群体,使得很难得出明确的结论。结论:PA似乎是儿童和青少年癌症治疗的一种可行且安全的辅助治疗方法。尽管有很好的趋势,但需要进一步的大规模、多中心试验和标准化方案,以更好地确定长期效益和最佳干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supervised Physical Activity Interventions in Children and Adolescents with Cancer Undergoing Treatment-A Systematic Review.

Background: A cancer diagnosis and its treatment often disrupt a child's and adolescent's normal level of physical activity, which plays a vital role in their development and health. They are therefore often less physically active during treatment than before the diagnosis or compared to healthy peers. Today, there is no comprehensive overview of the safety, feasibility, clinical effectiveness, and potentially long-lasting impact of physical activity (PA) interventions in this population. Methods: We conducted a systematic review in PubMed according to PRISMA guidelines to evaluate studies on PA interventions during cancer treatment in children and adolescents up to 25 years of age. We used the Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tools to assess the risk of bias. Due to the heterogeneity in interventions and outcomes, we used descriptive approaches only to present the results. Results: Half of the 21 included studies were randomized controlled trials (10/21). PA interventions were found to be safe and feasible when tailored to the patient's age, treatment phase, and clinical condition. Most studies reported improvements in physical fitness, strength, and quality of life, with some reductions in fatigue. Variability in interventions and outcomes, along with small sample sizes and heterogeneous patient populations, made it difficult to draw clear conclusions. Conclusions: PA appears to be a feasible and, in terms of injuries, safe adjunct to cancer treatment in children and adolescents. Despite promising trends, further large-scale, multicenter trials with standardized protocols are needed to better establish the long-term benefits and optimal interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信