[消融指数引导下射频导管消融与第二代冷冻球囊消融治疗老年房颤的安全性和远期疗效]。

Q3 Medicine
X Wang, M Y Sun, Z L Wang, M Liang, Z Q Jin, J Ding, P Zhang, Y L Han
{"title":"[消融指数引导下射频导管消融与第二代冷冻球囊消融治疗老年房颤的安全性和远期疗效]。","authors":"X Wang, M Y Sun, Z L Wang, M Liang, Z Q Jin, J Ding, P Zhang, Y L Han","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20250207-00088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the efficacy and safety of ablation index-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) and second-generation cryoballoon ablation (CBA) in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective cohort study included 1 986 patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for AF at General Hospital of Northern Theater Command from August 2016 to May 2020, comprising 760 RFCA cases and 1 226 CBA cases. Elderly patients were defined as those aged 60 years or older, while non-elderly patients were those under 60 years of age. All patients were followed up for 3 years after the procedure to assess AF recurrence rates. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted and compared by log-rank test. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of AF recurrence. <b>Results:</b> Among 1 986 AF patients (aged (58.7±10.2) years; 1 307 males, 65.81%; 987 elderly patients, 49.70%), the overall AF recurrence rate was 24.37% (484/1 986). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a higher AF recurrence rate in the elderly group compared to the non-elderly group (log-rank <i>P</i>=0.007). In the RFCA group, AF recurrence rate was 22.50% (171/760), with no significant difference between the elderly (24.44%, 88/360) and non-elderly (20.75%, 83/400) subgroups (<i>P</i>=0.223). In the CBA group, recurrence rates were 25.53% (313/1 226), with significantly higher recurrence in elderly patients (28.55%, 179/627) than non-elderly (22.37%, 134/599) (<i>P</i>=0.013). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that advanced age was not an independent predictor of AF recurrence (<i>P</i>=0.447). Longer AF duration and larger left atrial diameter were independent risk factors for recurrence, while male sex was a protective factor (all <i>P</i><0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> Pulmonary vein isolation with second-generation CBA and RFCA guided by ablation index are safe and effective in the treatment of AF in elderly patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":38755,"journal":{"name":"中华心血管病杂志","volume":"53 4","pages":"382-387"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Safety and long-term efficacy of ablation index-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation and second-generation cryoballoon ablation in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation].\",\"authors\":\"X Wang, M Y Sun, Z L Wang, M Liang, Z Q Jin, J Ding, P Zhang, Y L Han\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20250207-00088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the efficacy and safety of ablation index-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) and second-generation cryoballoon ablation (CBA) in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective cohort study included 1 986 patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for AF at General Hospital of Northern Theater Command from August 2016 to May 2020, comprising 760 RFCA cases and 1 226 CBA cases. Elderly patients were defined as those aged 60 years or older, while non-elderly patients were those under 60 years of age. All patients were followed up for 3 years after the procedure to assess AF recurrence rates. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted and compared by log-rank test. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of AF recurrence. <b>Results:</b> Among 1 986 AF patients (aged (58.7±10.2) years; 1 307 males, 65.81%; 987 elderly patients, 49.70%), the overall AF recurrence rate was 24.37% (484/1 986). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a higher AF recurrence rate in the elderly group compared to the non-elderly group (log-rank <i>P</i>=0.007). In the RFCA group, AF recurrence rate was 22.50% (171/760), with no significant difference between the elderly (24.44%, 88/360) and non-elderly (20.75%, 83/400) subgroups (<i>P</i>=0.223). In the CBA group, recurrence rates were 25.53% (313/1 226), with significantly higher recurrence in elderly patients (28.55%, 179/627) than non-elderly (22.37%, 134/599) (<i>P</i>=0.013). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that advanced age was not an independent predictor of AF recurrence (<i>P</i>=0.447). Longer AF duration and larger left atrial diameter were independent risk factors for recurrence, while male sex was a protective factor (all <i>P</i><0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> Pulmonary vein isolation with second-generation CBA and RFCA guided by ablation index are safe and effective in the treatment of AF in elderly patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华心血管病杂志\",\"volume\":\"53 4\",\"pages\":\"382-387\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华心血管病杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20250207-00088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华心血管病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20250207-00088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨消融指数引导下射频导管消融(RFCA)与第二代冷冻球囊消融(CBA)治疗老年心房颤动(AF)的疗效和安全性。方法:选取2016年8月至2020年5月在北方战区总医院接受肺静脉隔离治疗的房颤患者1986例,其中RFCA 760例,CBA 1226例。老年患者定义为60岁及以上的患者,非老年患者定义为60岁以下的患者。所有患者术后随访3年以评估房颤复发率。绘制Kaplan-Meier生存曲线,采用log-rank检验进行比较。采用多因素logistic回归分析AF复发的影响因素。结果:1986例房颤患者(年龄(58.7±10.2)岁;男性1 307人,占65.81%;老年患者987例(49.70%),总复发率24.37%(484/ 1986)。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,老年组的房颤复发率高于非老年组(log-rank P=0.007)。RFCA组AF复发率为22.50%(171/760),老年亚组(24.44%,88/360)与非老年亚组(20.75%,83/400)之间差异无统计学意义(P=0.223)。CBA组复发率为25.53%(313/1 226),其中老年患者复发率为28.55%(179/627)显著高于非老年患者(22.37%,134/599)(P=0.013)。多因素logistic回归分析显示高龄不是房颤复发的独立预测因子(P=0.447)。房颤持续时间延长、左房内径增大是房颤复发的独立危险因素,而男性是房颤复发的保护因素(均为p)。结论:肺静脉隔离联合第二代CBA和消融指数引导下的RFCA治疗老年房颤安全有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Safety and long-term efficacy of ablation index-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation and second-generation cryoballoon ablation in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation].

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of ablation index-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) and second-generation cryoballoon ablation (CBA) in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 1 986 patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for AF at General Hospital of Northern Theater Command from August 2016 to May 2020, comprising 760 RFCA cases and 1 226 CBA cases. Elderly patients were defined as those aged 60 years or older, while non-elderly patients were those under 60 years of age. All patients were followed up for 3 years after the procedure to assess AF recurrence rates. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted and compared by log-rank test. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of AF recurrence. Results: Among 1 986 AF patients (aged (58.7±10.2) years; 1 307 males, 65.81%; 987 elderly patients, 49.70%), the overall AF recurrence rate was 24.37% (484/1 986). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a higher AF recurrence rate in the elderly group compared to the non-elderly group (log-rank P=0.007). In the RFCA group, AF recurrence rate was 22.50% (171/760), with no significant difference between the elderly (24.44%, 88/360) and non-elderly (20.75%, 83/400) subgroups (P=0.223). In the CBA group, recurrence rates were 25.53% (313/1 226), with significantly higher recurrence in elderly patients (28.55%, 179/627) than non-elderly (22.37%, 134/599) (P=0.013). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that advanced age was not an independent predictor of AF recurrence (P=0.447). Longer AF duration and larger left atrial diameter were independent risk factors for recurrence, while male sex was a protective factor (all P<0.05). Conclusion: Pulmonary vein isolation with second-generation CBA and RFCA guided by ablation index are safe and effective in the treatment of AF in elderly patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华心血管病杂志
中华心血管病杂志 Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10577
期刊介绍: The Chinese Journal of Cardiology , established in February 1973, is one of the major academic medical journals sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association and a leading periodical in the field of cardiology in China. It specializes in cardiology and related disciplines with a readership of more than 25 000. The journal publishes editorials and guidelines as well as important original articles on clinical and experimental investigations, reflecting achievements made in China and promoting academic communication between domestic and foreign cardiologists. The journal includes the following columns: Editorials, Strategies, Comments, Clinical Investigations, Experimental Investigations, Epidemiology and Prevention, Lectures, Comprehensive Reviews, Continuing Medical Education, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信