Tommy Alfandy Nazwar, Muhammad Ridwan, Donny Wisnu Wardhana, Farhad Bal'afif, Fachriy Bal'afif, Solimun Solimun, Christin Panjaitan
{"title":"用减重法观察脑损伤大鼠模型的神经行为反应。","authors":"Tommy Alfandy Nazwar, Muhammad Ridwan, Donny Wisnu Wardhana, Farhad Bal'afif, Fachriy Bal'afif, Solimun Solimun, Christin Panjaitan","doi":"10.13004/kjnt.2025.21.e12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effects of high-impact loads in a weight drop (WD) model of traumatic brain injury (TBI) on sustained neurobehavioral dysfunction over a 14-day period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The experimental treatment involved craniotomy of rats, exposing the brain to a load applied via the WD method. Loads of 10 g were dropped from heights of 5, 10, and 15 cm. Neurobehavioral assessments included the Barnes maze for cognitive and affective function evaluation and the beam walking test for motor function assessment. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22 and GraphPad Prism version 9 software. Statistical significance was set at <i>p</i><0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the Barnes maze test, an increase in WD height was directly proportional to the post-test mean score, indicating poorer cognitive performance, with WD 15 cm yielding the highest mean score (146.6±16.8), followed by WD 10 cm (114.7±22.7) and WD 5 cm (100.6±18.6). Conversely, in the beam walk test, an increase in WD height contributed to a decline in motor performance, with the lowest mean score observed at WD 15 cm (20.6±9.84), while WD 10 cm (52.5±9.79) and WD 5 cm (74.7±12.5) showed less impairment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Load-height variations in WD TBI models significantly influence neurobehavioral outcomes, with the 15 cm height having the most pronounced effect, inducing impairments in motor, cognitive, and affective functions.</p>","PeriodicalId":36879,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Neurotrauma","volume":"21 2","pages":"102-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12062823/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Neurobehavioral Response in a Rat Model of Brain Injury Using the Weight Drop Method.\",\"authors\":\"Tommy Alfandy Nazwar, Muhammad Ridwan, Donny Wisnu Wardhana, Farhad Bal'afif, Fachriy Bal'afif, Solimun Solimun, Christin Panjaitan\",\"doi\":\"10.13004/kjnt.2025.21.e12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effects of high-impact loads in a weight drop (WD) model of traumatic brain injury (TBI) on sustained neurobehavioral dysfunction over a 14-day period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The experimental treatment involved craniotomy of rats, exposing the brain to a load applied via the WD method. Loads of 10 g were dropped from heights of 5, 10, and 15 cm. Neurobehavioral assessments included the Barnes maze for cognitive and affective function evaluation and the beam walking test for motor function assessment. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22 and GraphPad Prism version 9 software. Statistical significance was set at <i>p</i><0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the Barnes maze test, an increase in WD height was directly proportional to the post-test mean score, indicating poorer cognitive performance, with WD 15 cm yielding the highest mean score (146.6±16.8), followed by WD 10 cm (114.7±22.7) and WD 5 cm (100.6±18.6). Conversely, in the beam walk test, an increase in WD height contributed to a decline in motor performance, with the lowest mean score observed at WD 15 cm (20.6±9.84), while WD 10 cm (52.5±9.79) and WD 5 cm (74.7±12.5) showed less impairment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Load-height variations in WD TBI models significantly influence neurobehavioral outcomes, with the 15 cm height having the most pronounced effect, inducing impairments in motor, cognitive, and affective functions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Neurotrauma\",\"volume\":\"21 2\",\"pages\":\"102-113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12062823/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Neurotrauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2025.21.e12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2025.21.e12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评价高冲击负荷对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)减重模型持续14天神经行为功能障碍的影响。方法:采用大鼠开颅术,用WD法对大鼠进行脑负荷处理。从5厘米、10厘米和15厘米的高度落下10克的负荷。神经行为评估包括用于认知和情感功能评估的巴恩斯迷宫和用于运动功能评估的梁行走测试。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS) version 22和GraphPad Prism version 9软件进行统计分析。结果:在Barnes迷宫测试中,WD高度的增加与测试后平均得分成正比例,表明认知能力较差,WD 15 cm的平均得分最高(146.6±16.8),其次是WD 10 cm(114.7±22.7)和WD 5 cm(100.6±18.6)。相反,在梁行走测试中,WD高度的增加会导致运动性能的下降,WD 15 cm(20.6±9.84)的平均得分最低,WD 10 cm(52.5±9.79)和WD 5 cm(74.7±12.5)的损伤较小。结论:负重-身高变化对WD TBI模型的神经行为结果有显著影响,其中15 cm高度的影响最为显著,可引起运动、认知和情感功能的损伤。
The Neurobehavioral Response in a Rat Model of Brain Injury Using the Weight Drop Method.
Objective: To evaluate the effects of high-impact loads in a weight drop (WD) model of traumatic brain injury (TBI) on sustained neurobehavioral dysfunction over a 14-day period.
Methods: The experimental treatment involved craniotomy of rats, exposing the brain to a load applied via the WD method. Loads of 10 g were dropped from heights of 5, 10, and 15 cm. Neurobehavioral assessments included the Barnes maze for cognitive and affective function evaluation and the beam walking test for motor function assessment. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22 and GraphPad Prism version 9 software. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.
Results: In the Barnes maze test, an increase in WD height was directly proportional to the post-test mean score, indicating poorer cognitive performance, with WD 15 cm yielding the highest mean score (146.6±16.8), followed by WD 10 cm (114.7±22.7) and WD 5 cm (100.6±18.6). Conversely, in the beam walk test, an increase in WD height contributed to a decline in motor performance, with the lowest mean score observed at WD 15 cm (20.6±9.84), while WD 10 cm (52.5±9.79) and WD 5 cm (74.7±12.5) showed less impairment.
Conclusion: Load-height variations in WD TBI models significantly influence neurobehavioral outcomes, with the 15 cm height having the most pronounced effect, inducing impairments in motor, cognitive, and affective functions.