Kyung-Hee Kim, Byoung Geol Choi, Jin-Oh Choi, In-Cheol Kim, Jong-Chan Youn, Yang Hyun Cho, Hae-Young Lee, Sung-Ho Jung, Byung-Hee Oh
{"title":"韩国心脏移植分配和结果的血型差异(2010-2022)。","authors":"Kyung-Hee Kim, Byoung Geol Choi, Jin-Oh Choi, In-Cheol Kim, Jong-Chan Youn, Yang Hyun Cho, Hae-Young Lee, Sung-Ho Jung, Byung-Hee Oh","doi":"10.4070/kcj.2024.0281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>This study aimed to elucidate the influence of recipient blood type on heart transplant allocation dynamics in Korea, focusing on donor matching, wait times, and post-transplant survival from 2010 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, we examined 1,745 heart transplant recipients classified by blood types: A (n=631), B (n=488), AB (n=256), and O (n=370). Parameters studied encompassed donor and recipient ages, donor blood type compatibility, organ type, emergency status, waiting periods, and survival rates up to one year post-transplant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This investigation revealed significant disparities in the outcomes for heart transplant waitlist patients, differentiated by blood type. O recipients encountered notably extended median wait times of 110 days (an average of 300±514 days), which is substantially longer compared to A (65 days), B (58 days), and AB (29 days). Furthermore, the mortality rate for O recipients while on the waitlist was markedly high at 78.1%, in contrast to 75.2% for A, 72.3% for B, and 48.5% for AB. O recipients who, despite constituting a significant proportion of the donor pool (34.1%), received transplants at disproportionately lower rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Type O heart transplant recipients in Korea face significant challenges, including higher mortality rates during the waiting period and frequent necessity for left ventricular assist device interventions. Urgent policy reforms are needed to address these disparities and improve equitable organ allocation for blood type O patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17850,"journal":{"name":"Korean Circulation Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in Heart Transplantation Allocation and Outcomes by Blood Type in Korea (2010-2022).\",\"authors\":\"Kyung-Hee Kim, Byoung Geol Choi, Jin-Oh Choi, In-Cheol Kim, Jong-Chan Youn, Yang Hyun Cho, Hae-Young Lee, Sung-Ho Jung, Byung-Hee Oh\",\"doi\":\"10.4070/kcj.2024.0281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>This study aimed to elucidate the influence of recipient blood type on heart transplant allocation dynamics in Korea, focusing on donor matching, wait times, and post-transplant survival from 2010 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, we examined 1,745 heart transplant recipients classified by blood types: A (n=631), B (n=488), AB (n=256), and O (n=370). Parameters studied encompassed donor and recipient ages, donor blood type compatibility, organ type, emergency status, waiting periods, and survival rates up to one year post-transplant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This investigation revealed significant disparities in the outcomes for heart transplant waitlist patients, differentiated by blood type. O recipients encountered notably extended median wait times of 110 days (an average of 300±514 days), which is substantially longer compared to A (65 days), B (58 days), and AB (29 days). Furthermore, the mortality rate for O recipients while on the waitlist was markedly high at 78.1%, in contrast to 75.2% for A, 72.3% for B, and 48.5% for AB. O recipients who, despite constituting a significant proportion of the donor pool (34.1%), received transplants at disproportionately lower rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Type O heart transplant recipients in Korea face significant challenges, including higher mortality rates during the waiting period and frequent necessity for left ventricular assist device interventions. Urgent policy reforms are needed to address these disparities and improve equitable organ allocation for blood type O patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Circulation Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Circulation Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2024.0281\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Circulation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2024.0281","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Disparities in Heart Transplantation Allocation and Outcomes by Blood Type in Korea (2010-2022).
Background and objectives: This study aimed to elucidate the influence of recipient blood type on heart transplant allocation dynamics in Korea, focusing on donor matching, wait times, and post-transplant survival from 2010 to 2022.
Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we examined 1,745 heart transplant recipients classified by blood types: A (n=631), B (n=488), AB (n=256), and O (n=370). Parameters studied encompassed donor and recipient ages, donor blood type compatibility, organ type, emergency status, waiting periods, and survival rates up to one year post-transplant.
Results: This investigation revealed significant disparities in the outcomes for heart transplant waitlist patients, differentiated by blood type. O recipients encountered notably extended median wait times of 110 days (an average of 300±514 days), which is substantially longer compared to A (65 days), B (58 days), and AB (29 days). Furthermore, the mortality rate for O recipients while on the waitlist was markedly high at 78.1%, in contrast to 75.2% for A, 72.3% for B, and 48.5% for AB. O recipients who, despite constituting a significant proportion of the donor pool (34.1%), received transplants at disproportionately lower rates.
Conclusions: Type O heart transplant recipients in Korea face significant challenges, including higher mortality rates during the waiting period and frequent necessity for left ventricular assist device interventions. Urgent policy reforms are needed to address these disparities and improve equitable organ allocation for blood type O patients.
期刊介绍:
Korean Circulation Journal is the official journal of the Korean Society of Cardiology, the Korean Pediatric Heart Society, the Korean Society of Interventional Cardiology, and the Korean Society of Heart Failure. Abbreviated title is ''Korean Circ J''.
Korean Circulation Journal, established in 1971, is a professional, peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of cardiovascular medicine, including original articles of basic research and clinical findings, review articles, editorials, images in cardiovascular medicine, and letters to the editor. Korean Circulation Journal is published monthly in English and publishes scientific and state-of-the-art clinical articles aimed at improving human health in general and contributing to the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular diseases in particular.
The journal is published on the official website (https://e-kcj.org). It is indexed in PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE, Web of Science), Scopus, EMBASE, Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), Google Scholar, KoreaMed, KoreaMed Synapse and KoMCI, and easily available to wide international researchers