间断性阑尾切除术与原发阑尾切除术相比,结肠癌新发率更高——一个粗略的精确匹配分析。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Anneliese Markus, Rachel Lippman, Adam H Abbas, Csaba Gajdos, Nader D Nader
{"title":"间断性阑尾切除术与原发阑尾切除术相比,结肠癌新发率更高——一个粗略的精确匹配分析。","authors":"Anneliese Markus, Rachel Lippman, Adam H Abbas, Csaba Gajdos, Nader D Nader","doi":"10.1002/jso.28138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>While there is low risk of emergent appendectomy patients becoming diagnosed with a neoplasm, the rates are much higher in patients undergoing interval appendectomies. This study compares the incidence rates of new primary right colon neoplasms and postoperative complications between interval and primary appendectomies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study from 2001 to 2020 involving patients from 92 healthcare organizations within TriNetX. Patients' diagnosis and procedure were extracted from ICD and CPT codes. Primary and interval appendectomy (IA) cohorts were defined as having an appendectomy procedure 0-14 and 15-90 days from the initial diagnosis, respectively. Patients in each cohort were matched 1:1 on demographics via Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM). Postoperative complications and oncological outcomes were defined by specific ICD and/or CPT codes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-matching, there were 2803 patients included in each cohort. IA patients were associated with 3.07 times greater incidence rates of malignant neoplasm of the right colon and appendix (p < 0.001). However, IA patients were associated with 2.63 times lower postoperative complication rates (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IA patients are more likely to be diagnosed with new right-sided neoplasms postoperatively. Future studies are necessary to determine appropriate cancer screening methods for IA candidates.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Higher Rates of New Colon Neoplasm in Interval vs. Primary Appendectomies-A Coarsened Exact Matching Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Anneliese Markus, Rachel Lippman, Adam H Abbas, Csaba Gajdos, Nader D Nader\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jso.28138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>While there is low risk of emergent appendectomy patients becoming diagnosed with a neoplasm, the rates are much higher in patients undergoing interval appendectomies. This study compares the incidence rates of new primary right colon neoplasms and postoperative complications between interval and primary appendectomies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study from 2001 to 2020 involving patients from 92 healthcare organizations within TriNetX. Patients' diagnosis and procedure were extracted from ICD and CPT codes. Primary and interval appendectomy (IA) cohorts were defined as having an appendectomy procedure 0-14 and 15-90 days from the initial diagnosis, respectively. Patients in each cohort were matched 1:1 on demographics via Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM). Postoperative complications and oncological outcomes were defined by specific ICD and/or CPT codes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-matching, there were 2803 patients included in each cohort. IA patients were associated with 3.07 times greater incidence rates of malignant neoplasm of the right colon and appendix (p < 0.001). However, IA patients were associated with 2.63 times lower postoperative complication rates (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IA patients are more likely to be diagnosed with new right-sided neoplasms postoperatively. Future studies are necessary to determine appropriate cancer screening methods for IA candidates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.28138\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.28138","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:虽然急诊阑尾切除术患者被诊断为肿瘤的风险较低,但间隔期阑尾切除术患者的发生率要高得多。本研究比较了间歇阑尾切除术和原发性阑尾切除术之间新发右结肠肿瘤的发生率和术后并发症。方法:我们从2001年到2020年进行了一项回顾性队列研究,涉及来自TriNetX内92家医疗机构的患者。从ICD和CPT代码中提取患者的诊断和程序。原发性和间隔期阑尾切除术(IA)队列分别定义为在初次诊断后0-14天和15-90天进行阑尾切除术。每个队列的患者通过粗化精确匹配(CEM)在人口统计学上进行1:1匹配。术后并发症和肿瘤预后由特定的ICD和/或CPT代码定义。结果:配对后,每个队列共纳入2803例患者。IA患者右结肠和阑尾恶性肿瘤的发生率是正常患者的3.07倍(p)。结论:IA患者术后更容易出现右侧肿瘤。为IA候选人确定合适的癌症筛查方法需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Higher Rates of New Colon Neoplasm in Interval vs. Primary Appendectomies-A Coarsened Exact Matching Analysis.

Background and aims: While there is low risk of emergent appendectomy patients becoming diagnosed with a neoplasm, the rates are much higher in patients undergoing interval appendectomies. This study compares the incidence rates of new primary right colon neoplasms and postoperative complications between interval and primary appendectomies.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study from 2001 to 2020 involving patients from 92 healthcare organizations within TriNetX. Patients' diagnosis and procedure were extracted from ICD and CPT codes. Primary and interval appendectomy (IA) cohorts were defined as having an appendectomy procedure 0-14 and 15-90 days from the initial diagnosis, respectively. Patients in each cohort were matched 1:1 on demographics via Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM). Postoperative complications and oncological outcomes were defined by specific ICD and/or CPT codes.

Results: Post-matching, there were 2803 patients included in each cohort. IA patients were associated with 3.07 times greater incidence rates of malignant neoplasm of the right colon and appendix (p < 0.001). However, IA patients were associated with 2.63 times lower postoperative complication rates (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: IA patients are more likely to be diagnosed with new right-sided neoplasms postoperatively. Future studies are necessary to determine appropriate cancer screening methods for IA candidates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信