沙特阿拉伯吉达医科学生辐射防护知识及不同成像方式的评估

IF 3.3 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
International Journal of Biomedical Imaging Pub Date : 2025-04-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/ijbi/1528291
Raghad Aljondi, Rahaf Alem, Rowa Aljondi, Abdulrahman Tajaldeen, Salem Saeed Alghamdi, Mohammed Majdi Toras
{"title":"沙特阿拉伯吉达医科学生辐射防护知识及不同成像方式的评估","authors":"Raghad Aljondi, Rahaf Alem, Rowa Aljondi, Abdulrahman Tajaldeen, Salem Saeed Alghamdi, Mohammed Majdi Toras","doi":"10.1155/ijbi/1528291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Doctors can play a significant role in attributing to patient safety concerning exposure to ionizing radiation. Therefore, healthcare professionals should have adequate knowledge about radiation risk and protection of different medical imaging examinations. This study aims to evaluate the knowledge about radiation protection (RP) and applications of different imaging modalities (IMs) among medical students in their clinical years and intern, in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> A cross-sectional study based on an online questionnaire was performed in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, on 170 medical students during January 2024; the study participants included clinical years medical students (from Years 4 to 6) and interns of both gender and basic year medical students, and specialists and consultants were excluded. For each participant, the percentage of correct answers was calculated for the knowledge RP and knowledge in IMs separately, and each participant will have two scores, RP knowledge score (RPKS) and IM knowledge score (IMKS). <b>Results:</b> A total of 170 medical students responded and completed the questionnaire. The overall levels of awareness and knowledge of the students was determined through calculations of their scores in answering the questionnaire; students in this study group have low average knowledge score in RP, which is 43, while they have moderate-high knowledge score in IMs, which is 68. Regarding the knowledge score, for the RPKS, the best participant scored 82, while the worst scored 0, whereas for IMKS, the best participant score 100, while the worst scored 0. However, according to the SD, participants generally differ between each other by 19 in RPKS and 31 in IMKS. <b>Conclusions:</b> The assessments of medical students' knowledge regarding radiation exposure in diagnostic modalities reveal a low level of confidence in their knowledge of ionizing radiation dose parameters. Furthermore, the mean scores on overall knowledge assessments indicate a need for improvement in RP knowledge for medical students. To address this gap, a comprehensive modification of the undergraduate medical curriculum's radiology component is required by enhancing active learning approaches and integrating radiation safety courses early in the medical curriculum. Medical education institutions could implement ongoing workshops, online modules, and certification programs to reinforce radiation safety principles.</p>","PeriodicalId":47063,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biomedical Imaging","volume":"2025 ","pages":"1528291"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12045688/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessments of Medical Student's Knowledge About Radiation Protection and Different Imaging Modalities in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.\",\"authors\":\"Raghad Aljondi, Rahaf Alem, Rowa Aljondi, Abdulrahman Tajaldeen, Salem Saeed Alghamdi, Mohammed Majdi Toras\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/ijbi/1528291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Doctors can play a significant role in attributing to patient safety concerning exposure to ionizing radiation. Therefore, healthcare professionals should have adequate knowledge about radiation risk and protection of different medical imaging examinations. This study aims to evaluate the knowledge about radiation protection (RP) and applications of different imaging modalities (IMs) among medical students in their clinical years and intern, in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> A cross-sectional study based on an online questionnaire was performed in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, on 170 medical students during January 2024; the study participants included clinical years medical students (from Years 4 to 6) and interns of both gender and basic year medical students, and specialists and consultants were excluded. For each participant, the percentage of correct answers was calculated for the knowledge RP and knowledge in IMs separately, and each participant will have two scores, RP knowledge score (RPKS) and IM knowledge score (IMKS). <b>Results:</b> A total of 170 medical students responded and completed the questionnaire. The overall levels of awareness and knowledge of the students was determined through calculations of their scores in answering the questionnaire; students in this study group have low average knowledge score in RP, which is 43, while they have moderate-high knowledge score in IMs, which is 68. Regarding the knowledge score, for the RPKS, the best participant scored 82, while the worst scored 0, whereas for IMKS, the best participant score 100, while the worst scored 0. However, according to the SD, participants generally differ between each other by 19 in RPKS and 31 in IMKS. <b>Conclusions:</b> The assessments of medical students' knowledge regarding radiation exposure in diagnostic modalities reveal a low level of confidence in their knowledge of ionizing radiation dose parameters. Furthermore, the mean scores on overall knowledge assessments indicate a need for improvement in RP knowledge for medical students. To address this gap, a comprehensive modification of the undergraduate medical curriculum's radiology component is required by enhancing active learning approaches and integrating radiation safety courses early in the medical curriculum. Medical education institutions could implement ongoing workshops, online modules, and certification programs to reinforce radiation safety principles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Biomedical Imaging\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"1528291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12045688/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Biomedical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijbi/1528291\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biomedical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijbi/1528291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:医生可以发挥重要作用,归因病人的安全有关暴露于电离辐射。因此,医护人员应充分了解不同医学影像检查的辐射风险和防护。本研究旨在评估沙特阿拉伯吉达医科学生在临床和实习期间对辐射防护(RP)的知识和不同成像方式(IMs)的应用。材料与方法:基于在线问卷的横断面研究于2024年1月在沙特阿拉伯吉达对170名医学生进行;研究参与者包括临床医科学生(从4年级到6年级)、男女实习生和基础医科学生,专家和顾问被排除在外。对于每个参与者,分别计算RP知识和IM知识的正确答案百分比,每个参与者将有两个分数,RP知识分数(RPKS)和IM知识分数(IMKS)。结果:共有170名医学生参与问卷调查。学生的整体意识和知识水平是通过计算他们回答问卷的分数来确定的;本研究组学生RP平均知识分较低,为43分;IMs平均知识分中高,为68分。在知识得分方面,在RPKS中,最好的参与者得82分,最差的得0分,而在IMKS中,最好的参与者得100分,最差的得0分。然而,根据SD,参与者在RPKS和IMKS上的差异一般为19和31。结论:医学生对诊断方式辐射暴露知识的评估显示,他们对电离辐射剂量参数知识的置信度较低。此外,总体知识评估的平均得分表明医学生的RP知识需要改进。为了解决这一差距,需要通过加强主动学习方法和在医学课程的早期整合辐射安全课程来全面修改本科医学课程的放射学部分。医学教育机构可以实施正在进行的研讨会、在线模块和认证计划,以加强辐射安全原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessments of Medical Student's Knowledge About Radiation Protection and Different Imaging Modalities in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Introduction: Doctors can play a significant role in attributing to patient safety concerning exposure to ionizing radiation. Therefore, healthcare professionals should have adequate knowledge about radiation risk and protection of different medical imaging examinations. This study aims to evaluate the knowledge about radiation protection (RP) and applications of different imaging modalities (IMs) among medical students in their clinical years and intern, in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study based on an online questionnaire was performed in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, on 170 medical students during January 2024; the study participants included clinical years medical students (from Years 4 to 6) and interns of both gender and basic year medical students, and specialists and consultants were excluded. For each participant, the percentage of correct answers was calculated for the knowledge RP and knowledge in IMs separately, and each participant will have two scores, RP knowledge score (RPKS) and IM knowledge score (IMKS). Results: A total of 170 medical students responded and completed the questionnaire. The overall levels of awareness and knowledge of the students was determined through calculations of their scores in answering the questionnaire; students in this study group have low average knowledge score in RP, which is 43, while they have moderate-high knowledge score in IMs, which is 68. Regarding the knowledge score, for the RPKS, the best participant scored 82, while the worst scored 0, whereas for IMKS, the best participant score 100, while the worst scored 0. However, according to the SD, participants generally differ between each other by 19 in RPKS and 31 in IMKS. Conclusions: The assessments of medical students' knowledge regarding radiation exposure in diagnostic modalities reveal a low level of confidence in their knowledge of ionizing radiation dose parameters. Furthermore, the mean scores on overall knowledge assessments indicate a need for improvement in RP knowledge for medical students. To address this gap, a comprehensive modification of the undergraduate medical curriculum's radiology component is required by enhancing active learning approaches and integrating radiation safety courses early in the medical curriculum. Medical education institutions could implement ongoing workshops, online modules, and certification programs to reinforce radiation safety principles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Biomedical Imaging is managed by a board of editors comprising internationally renowned active researchers. The journal is freely accessible online and also offered for purchase in print format. It employs a web-based review system to ensure swift turnaround times while maintaining high standards. In addition to regular issues, special issues are organized by guest editors. The subject areas covered include (but are not limited to): Digital radiography and tomosynthesis X-ray computed tomography (CT) Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) Positron emission tomography (PET) Ultrasound imaging Diffuse optical tomography, coherence, fluorescence, bioluminescence tomography, impedance tomography Neutron imaging for biomedical applications Magnetic and optical spectroscopy, and optical biopsy Optical, electron, scanning tunneling/atomic force microscopy Small animal imaging Functional, cellular, and molecular imaging Imaging assays for screening and molecular analysis Microarray image analysis and bioinformatics Emerging biomedical imaging techniques Imaging modality fusion Biomedical imaging instrumentation Biomedical image processing, pattern recognition, and analysis Biomedical image visualization, compression, transmission, and storage Imaging and modeling related to systems biology and systems biomedicine Applied mathematics, applied physics, and chemistry related to biomedical imaging Grid-enabling technology for biomedical imaging and informatics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信