原发性骨肿瘤半皮质同种异体骨移植重建的长期临床和功能结果是什么?

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Marcos R Gonzalez, Erhan Okay, Joseph O Werenski, Joseph J Connolly, Andrew Pfeiffer, Erik T Newman, Kevin A Raskin, Santiago A Lozano-Calderón
{"title":"原发性骨肿瘤半皮质同种异体骨移植重建的长期临床和功能结果是什么?","authors":"Marcos R Gonzalez, Erhan Okay, Joseph O Werenski, Joseph J Connolly, Andrew Pfeiffer, Erik T Newman, Kevin A Raskin, Santiago A Lozano-Calderón","doi":"10.1002/jso.28147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hemicortical allograft reconstruction is associated with low short-term complication rates and excellent functional outcomes. However, data on their long-term complication profile and patient-reported outcomes is scarce to non-existent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with hemicortical resection and allograft reconstruction for primary bone tumors were included. The Henderson classification for biologic reconstruction was used to classify allograft failures. Functional outcomes at a minimum of 10 years postoperatively were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four patients with femur hemicortical allograft and 20 with tibia allograft were included. Allograft failure and reoperation occurred in 39% and 52% of patients, respectively. The main causes of allograft failure were infection, soft-tissue failure, and structural failure (9% each). Tibia allografts had a higher rate of failure due to infection (p = 0.02) and nonunion (p = 0.049) compared to femur allografts. There were no differences in allograft failure-free survival based on bone (tibia vs. femur) and osteosynthesis type (plate vs. screw and plates). Median TESS-LE and LEFS scores were 98.8% and 87.5% for tibia allografts, and 98.1% and 97.5% for femur allografts, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Long-term allograft failure-free survival was excellent, with infection and soft-tissue failures as the main failure mechanisms. At last follow-up, patients who still had the hemicortical allograft displayed excellent functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Are the Long-Term Clinical and Functional Outcomes After Hemicortical Allograft Reconstruction for Primary Bone Tumors?\",\"authors\":\"Marcos R Gonzalez, Erhan Okay, Joseph O Werenski, Joseph J Connolly, Andrew Pfeiffer, Erik T Newman, Kevin A Raskin, Santiago A Lozano-Calderón\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jso.28147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hemicortical allograft reconstruction is associated with low short-term complication rates and excellent functional outcomes. However, data on their long-term complication profile and patient-reported outcomes is scarce to non-existent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with hemicortical resection and allograft reconstruction for primary bone tumors were included. The Henderson classification for biologic reconstruction was used to classify allograft failures. Functional outcomes at a minimum of 10 years postoperatively were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four patients with femur hemicortical allograft and 20 with tibia allograft were included. Allograft failure and reoperation occurred in 39% and 52% of patients, respectively. The main causes of allograft failure were infection, soft-tissue failure, and structural failure (9% each). Tibia allografts had a higher rate of failure due to infection (p = 0.02) and nonunion (p = 0.049) compared to femur allografts. There were no differences in allograft failure-free survival based on bone (tibia vs. femur) and osteosynthesis type (plate vs. screw and plates). Median TESS-LE and LEFS scores were 98.8% and 87.5% for tibia allografts, and 98.1% and 97.5% for femur allografts, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Long-term allograft failure-free survival was excellent, with infection and soft-tissue failures as the main failure mechanisms. At last follow-up, patients who still had the hemicortical allograft displayed excellent functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.28147\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.28147","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:半皮质同种异体移植物重建具有较低的短期并发症发生率和良好的功能预后。然而,关于其长期并发症概况和患者报告的结果的数据很少甚至不存在。方法:对原发性骨肿瘤行半皮质切除术和同种异体骨移植重建的患者进行分析。采用亨德森生物重建分类法对同种异体移植失败进行分类。评估术后至少10年的功能结果。结果:股骨半皮质移植24例,胫骨移植20例。同种异体移植失败和再手术的发生率分别为39%和52%。同种异体移植失败的主要原因是感染、软组织衰竭和结构衰竭(各占9%)。与股骨异体移植相比,胫骨异体移植的感染失败率(p = 0.02)和骨不连(p = 0.049)更高。同种异体移植物无衰竭生存率基于骨(胫骨与股骨)和骨结合类型(钢板与螺钉和钢板)没有差异。胫骨异体移植的中位TESS-LE和LEFS评分分别为98.8%和87.5%,股骨异体移植的中位TESS-LE和LEFS评分分别为98.1%和97.5%。结论:同种异体移植物长期无衰竭生存良好,感染和软组织衰竭是主要的衰竭机制。在最后的随访中,仍然接受同种异体半皮质移植的患者显示出良好的功能预后。证据等级:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What Are the Long-Term Clinical and Functional Outcomes After Hemicortical Allograft Reconstruction for Primary Bone Tumors?

Background: Hemicortical allograft reconstruction is associated with low short-term complication rates and excellent functional outcomes. However, data on their long-term complication profile and patient-reported outcomes is scarce to non-existent.

Methods: Patients with hemicortical resection and allograft reconstruction for primary bone tumors were included. The Henderson classification for biologic reconstruction was used to classify allograft failures. Functional outcomes at a minimum of 10 years postoperatively were assessed.

Results: Twenty-four patients with femur hemicortical allograft and 20 with tibia allograft were included. Allograft failure and reoperation occurred in 39% and 52% of patients, respectively. The main causes of allograft failure were infection, soft-tissue failure, and structural failure (9% each). Tibia allografts had a higher rate of failure due to infection (p = 0.02) and nonunion (p = 0.049) compared to femur allografts. There were no differences in allograft failure-free survival based on bone (tibia vs. femur) and osteosynthesis type (plate vs. screw and plates). Median TESS-LE and LEFS scores were 98.8% and 87.5% for tibia allografts, and 98.1% and 97.5% for femur allografts, respectively.

Conclusion: Long-term allograft failure-free survival was excellent, with infection and soft-tissue failures as the main failure mechanisms. At last follow-up, patients who still had the hemicortical allograft displayed excellent functional outcomes.

Level of evidence: Level IV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信