儿童期或青少年虐待与原发性开角型青光眼的纵向队列研究

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Eye Pub Date : 2025-04-10 DOI:10.1038/s41433-025-03785-3
Megan Yu, Hannah H Hwang, Andrea L Roberts, Karestan C Koenen, Janey L Wiggs, Louis R Pasquale, Jae H Kang
{"title":"儿童期或青少年虐待与原发性开角型青光眼的纵向队列研究","authors":"Megan Yu, Hannah H Hwang, Andrea L Roberts, Karestan C Koenen, Janey L Wiggs, Louis R Pasquale, Jae H Kang","doi":"10.1038/s41433-025-03785-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine associations of childhood/adolescence abuse with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and POAG subtypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included US female nurse participants from the Nurses' Health Study II (1989-2019). Participants (n = 59,712) were ≥40 years old, reported follow-up eye exams, had no glaucoma, and had early-life adverse experience data. Self-reported childhood/adolescence abuse was assessed in 2001 with the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS) and the 2-item sexual maltreatment scale of the parent-child CTS. We evaluated associations by type (any, physical, sexual) and timing (childhood, adolescence). POAG cases (n = 255) were confirmed and subtyped with medical record review. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Severe childhood/adolescent abuse was reported by 16.5%. There was no association between any childhood/adolescent abuse (HR 1.03; 95% CI: 0.79-1.35), physical abuse, abuse experienced during childhood only or adolescence only, and POAG risk. Compared to no sexual abuse history, any sexual abuse was modestly associated with POAG (HR 1.31; 95% CI: 1.01-1.69). Specifically, we observed adverse associations with sexual abuse for the POAG subtype with paracentral vs. peripheral VF loss (P<sub>heterogeneity</sub> = 0.04). For paracentral POAG, we observed a 1.80-fold higher risk (95% CI: 1.14-2.85) with any sexual abuse history, a 2.38-fold higher risk (95% CI: 1.25-4.53) with a threat of/actual forced sexual activity, and a significant dose-response relationship with increasing severity of sexual abuse (P<sub>trend</sub> = 0.005; P<sub>trend_FDR corrected</sub> = 0.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While any childhood/adolescence abuse history was not associated with POAG, the modest adverse associations with early-life sexual abuse history warrant confirmation in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12125,"journal":{"name":"Eye","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Childhood or adolescent abuse and primary open-angle glaucoma in a longitudinal cohort of women.\",\"authors\":\"Megan Yu, Hannah H Hwang, Andrea L Roberts, Karestan C Koenen, Janey L Wiggs, Louis R Pasquale, Jae H Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41433-025-03785-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine associations of childhood/adolescence abuse with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and POAG subtypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included US female nurse participants from the Nurses' Health Study II (1989-2019). Participants (n = 59,712) were ≥40 years old, reported follow-up eye exams, had no glaucoma, and had early-life adverse experience data. Self-reported childhood/adolescence abuse was assessed in 2001 with the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS) and the 2-item sexual maltreatment scale of the parent-child CTS. We evaluated associations by type (any, physical, sexual) and timing (childhood, adolescence). POAG cases (n = 255) were confirmed and subtyped with medical record review. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Severe childhood/adolescent abuse was reported by 16.5%. There was no association between any childhood/adolescent abuse (HR 1.03; 95% CI: 0.79-1.35), physical abuse, abuse experienced during childhood only or adolescence only, and POAG risk. Compared to no sexual abuse history, any sexual abuse was modestly associated with POAG (HR 1.31; 95% CI: 1.01-1.69). Specifically, we observed adverse associations with sexual abuse for the POAG subtype with paracentral vs. peripheral VF loss (P<sub>heterogeneity</sub> = 0.04). For paracentral POAG, we observed a 1.80-fold higher risk (95% CI: 1.14-2.85) with any sexual abuse history, a 2.38-fold higher risk (95% CI: 1.25-4.53) with a threat of/actual forced sexual activity, and a significant dose-response relationship with increasing severity of sexual abuse (P<sub>trend</sub> = 0.005; P<sub>trend_FDR corrected</sub> = 0.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While any childhood/adolescence abuse history was not associated with POAG, the modest adverse associations with early-life sexual abuse history warrant confirmation in future studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eye\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eye\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-025-03785-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-025-03785-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨儿童/青少年虐待与原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)及其亚型的关系。方法:我们纳入了来自护士健康研究II(1989-2019)的美国女护士参与者。参与者(n = 59,712)年龄≥40岁,报告随访眼科检查,无青光眼,有早期不良经历数据。采用2001年修订的冲突策略量表(CTS)和亲子冲突策略量表(CTS)中的两项性虐待量表对儿童/青少年自述的虐待行为进行评估。我们评估了类型(任何,身体,性)和时间(童年,青春期)的关联。255例POAG病例经确认,并通过病历复习进行分型。采用多变量校正Cox比例风险模型估计风险比(hr)和95%置信区间(ci)。结果:儿童/青少年严重虐待发生率为16.5%。儿童/青少年虐待与儿童/青少年虐待之间没有关联(HR 1.03;95% CI: 0.79-1.35)、身体虐待、仅在儿童期或仅在青春期经历的虐待和POAG风险。与无性侵史的患者相比,有性侵史的患者与POAG有一定的相关性(HR 1.31;95% ci: 1.01-1.69)。具体来说,我们观察到POAG亚型与性虐待的不良关联,包括旁中央和外周VF丧失(异质性= 0.04)。对于中心旁POAG,我们观察到任何性虐待史的风险高1.80倍(95% CI: 1.14-2.85),威胁/实际强迫性行为的风险高2.38倍(95% CI: 1.25-4.53),并且与性虐待严重程度增加呈显著的剂量-反应关系(p趋势= 0.005;Ptrend_FDR修正= 0.045)。结论:虽然任何童年/青少年虐待史与POAG无关,但早期生活性虐待史的适度不良关联值得在未来的研究中证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Childhood or adolescent abuse and primary open-angle glaucoma in a longitudinal cohort of women.

Objective: To examine associations of childhood/adolescence abuse with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and POAG subtypes.

Methods: We included US female nurse participants from the Nurses' Health Study II (1989-2019). Participants (n = 59,712) were ≥40 years old, reported follow-up eye exams, had no glaucoma, and had early-life adverse experience data. Self-reported childhood/adolescence abuse was assessed in 2001 with the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS) and the 2-item sexual maltreatment scale of the parent-child CTS. We evaluated associations by type (any, physical, sexual) and timing (childhood, adolescence). POAG cases (n = 255) were confirmed and subtyped with medical record review. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: Severe childhood/adolescent abuse was reported by 16.5%. There was no association between any childhood/adolescent abuse (HR 1.03; 95% CI: 0.79-1.35), physical abuse, abuse experienced during childhood only or adolescence only, and POAG risk. Compared to no sexual abuse history, any sexual abuse was modestly associated with POAG (HR 1.31; 95% CI: 1.01-1.69). Specifically, we observed adverse associations with sexual abuse for the POAG subtype with paracentral vs. peripheral VF loss (Pheterogeneity = 0.04). For paracentral POAG, we observed a 1.80-fold higher risk (95% CI: 1.14-2.85) with any sexual abuse history, a 2.38-fold higher risk (95% CI: 1.25-4.53) with a threat of/actual forced sexual activity, and a significant dose-response relationship with increasing severity of sexual abuse (Ptrend = 0.005; Ptrend_FDR corrected = 0.045).

Conclusions: While any childhood/adolescence abuse history was not associated with POAG, the modest adverse associations with early-life sexual abuse history warrant confirmation in future studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Eye
Eye 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
481
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Eye seeks to provide the international practising ophthalmologist with high quality articles, of academic rigour, on the latest global clinical and laboratory based research. Its core aim is to advance the science and practice of ophthalmology with the latest clinical- and scientific-based research. Whilst principally aimed at the practising clinician, the journal contains material of interest to a wider readership including optometrists, orthoptists, other health care professionals and research workers in all aspects of the field of visual science worldwide. Eye is the official journal of The Royal College of Ophthalmologists. Eye encourages the submission of original articles covering all aspects of ophthalmology including: external eye disease; oculo-plastic surgery; orbital and lacrimal disease; ocular surface and corneal disorders; paediatric ophthalmology and strabismus; glaucoma; medical and surgical retina; neuro-ophthalmology; cataract and refractive surgery; ocular oncology; ophthalmic pathology; ophthalmic genetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信