意识障碍早期和长期恢复的药物治疗:目前的知识和有希望的途径。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Rosalie Girard Pepin, Fatemeh Seyfzadeh, David Williamson, Olivia Gosseries, Catherine Duclos
{"title":"意识障碍早期和长期恢复的药物治疗:目前的知识和有希望的途径。","authors":"Rosalie Girard Pepin, Fatemeh Seyfzadeh, David Williamson, Olivia Gosseries, Catherine Duclos","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2025.2500757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Disorders of consciousness (DoC) are characterized by impaired arousal and/or awareness, ranging from coma to unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, minimally conscious state, and cognitive motor dissociation. Pharmacological treatment options remain limited, complicated by the heterogeneity of etiologies, such as traumatic brain injury, stroke, and infections. The lack of rigorous clinical trials has led to off-label use of treatments, often without clear mechanistic understanding, posing challenges for effective patient care.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this perspective, the authors report on key studies concerning the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions, including dopaminergic and GABAergic agents, antidepressants, statins, and anticonvulsants, in promoting recovery of consciousness in DoC.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Robust longitudinal clinical trials are needed, with priority given to early subacute phase intervention. Outcomes should be better defined, considering immediate responses to medication while also increasing the emphasis on long-term quality of life. Unified functional and mechanistic frameworks are needed to guide research and foster collaboration. Furthermore, a shift toward personalized medicine would benefit this heterogeneous population. Moving forward, assessing the efficacy of more unconventional or 'paradoxical' pharmacological options in treatment plans will be essential. The authors also expect an increased use of AI tools to identify factors that best predict treatment responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacological therapies for early and long-term recovery in disorders of consciousness: current knowledge and promising avenues.\",\"authors\":\"Rosalie Girard Pepin, Fatemeh Seyfzadeh, David Williamson, Olivia Gosseries, Catherine Duclos\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737175.2025.2500757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Disorders of consciousness (DoC) are characterized by impaired arousal and/or awareness, ranging from coma to unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, minimally conscious state, and cognitive motor dissociation. Pharmacological treatment options remain limited, complicated by the heterogeneity of etiologies, such as traumatic brain injury, stroke, and infections. The lack of rigorous clinical trials has led to off-label use of treatments, often without clear mechanistic understanding, posing challenges for effective patient care.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this perspective, the authors report on key studies concerning the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions, including dopaminergic and GABAergic agents, antidepressants, statins, and anticonvulsants, in promoting recovery of consciousness in DoC.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Robust longitudinal clinical trials are needed, with priority given to early subacute phase intervention. Outcomes should be better defined, considering immediate responses to medication while also increasing the emphasis on long-term quality of life. Unified functional and mechanistic frameworks are needed to guide research and foster collaboration. Furthermore, a shift toward personalized medicine would benefit this heterogeneous population. Moving forward, assessing the efficacy of more unconventional or 'paradoxical' pharmacological options in treatment plans will be essential. The authors also expect an increased use of AI tools to identify factors that best predict treatment responses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2025.2500757\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2025.2500757","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

意识障碍(DoC)的特征是觉醒和/或意识受损,范围从昏迷到无反应性觉醒综合征,最低意识状态和认知运动分离。药物治疗的选择仍然有限,复杂的异质性的病因,如创伤性脑损伤,中风和感染。缺乏严格的临床试验导致了治疗的标签外使用,通常没有明确的机制理解,对有效的患者护理提出了挑战。涵盖领域:从这个角度来看,作者报告了有关药物干预有效性的关键研究,包括多巴胺能和gaba能药物、抗抑郁药、他汀类药物和抗惊厥药,在促进DoC意识恢复方面的有效性。专家意见:需要强有力的纵向临床试验,优先考虑早期亚急性期干预。结果应该更好地定义,考虑对药物的即时反应,同时也增加对长期生活质量的重视。需要统一的功能和机制框架来指导研究和促进合作。此外,向个性化医疗的转变将使这些异质人群受益。展望未来,评估治疗方案中非常规或“矛盾的”药理学选择的疗效将是至关重要的。作者还期望增加人工智能工具的使用,以确定最能预测治疗反应的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pharmacological therapies for early and long-term recovery in disorders of consciousness: current knowledge and promising avenues.

Introduction: Disorders of consciousness (DoC) are characterized by impaired arousal and/or awareness, ranging from coma to unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, minimally conscious state, and cognitive motor dissociation. Pharmacological treatment options remain limited, complicated by the heterogeneity of etiologies, such as traumatic brain injury, stroke, and infections. The lack of rigorous clinical trials has led to off-label use of treatments, often without clear mechanistic understanding, posing challenges for effective patient care.

Areas covered: In this perspective, the authors report on key studies concerning the effectiveness of pharmacological interventions, including dopaminergic and GABAergic agents, antidepressants, statins, and anticonvulsants, in promoting recovery of consciousness in DoC.

Expert opinion: Robust longitudinal clinical trials are needed, with priority given to early subacute phase intervention. Outcomes should be better defined, considering immediate responses to medication while also increasing the emphasis on long-term quality of life. Unified functional and mechanistic frameworks are needed to guide research and foster collaboration. Furthermore, a shift toward personalized medicine would benefit this heterogeneous population. Moving forward, assessing the efficacy of more unconventional or 'paradoxical' pharmacological options in treatment plans will be essential. The authors also expect an increased use of AI tools to identify factors that best predict treatment responses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (ISSN 1473-7175) provides expert reviews on the use of drugs and medicines in clinical neurology and neuropsychiatry. Coverage includes disease management, new medicines and drugs in neurology, therapeutic indications, diagnostics, medical treatment guidelines and neurological diseases such as stroke, epilepsy, Alzheimer''s and Parkinson''s. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信