消除了传统负压伤口治疗(tNPWT)桥接应用的复杂性。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Mark E Chariker, Joanne Handsaker, Catherine McCarthy
{"title":"消除了传统负压伤口治疗(tNPWT)桥接应用的复杂性。","authors":"Mark E Chariker, Joanne Handsaker, Catherine McCarthy","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is an effective intervention for challenging wounds across multiple indications. Its application sometimes requires a technique known as 'bridging\" to prevent ulcerations caused by delivery port and tubing when positioning the device, which requires extra time and resources. The bridging technique may be adopted when it is considered essential to move the NPWT delivery port away from the wound bed or when treating wounds in close proximity to each other.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A survey was undertaken by 200 health care professionals (HCPs) in the United States who are experienced in utilizing traditional negative pressure wound therapy (tNPWT) and bridging. Primary objectives were to explore HCP opinion on 2 types of tNPWT delivery ports (soft and hard) between 2 leading manufacturers. Questions focused on the need for bridging, alleviation of complexity in application, and reducing concerns relating to medical device-related pressure injury when applied to awkward anatomical areas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HCPs (75%; n=150) largely agreed that the bridging technique makes application of tNPWT slightly more challenging. Reasons included additional time taken to apply (74%; n=148), increased dressing resource (67%; n=134), and additional staff required (50%; n=100). Over half (53%; n=106) agreed that the soft port can eliminate the need for bridging. The majority of wound specialists were significantly less likely to favor a hard port (58%; n=116). Two further potential benefits of using a tNPWT soft port include the associated risk of pain/pressure when applying a hard port over a smaller wound size (29%; n=58) and certain anatomical areas which pose a risk of pressure injury or kinked/twisted tubing (31%; n=62).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>tNPWT soft ports remain effective regardless of kinks or twists and can eliminate bridging in anatomical areas where patients may weight-bear on tubing or delivery ports, saving time and decreasing risks of periwound trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":23752,"journal":{"name":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","volume":"37 3","pages":"107-113"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Removing the complexities associated with traditional negative pressure wound therapy (tNPWT) bridging applications.\",\"authors\":\"Mark E Chariker, Joanne Handsaker, Catherine McCarthy\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is an effective intervention for challenging wounds across multiple indications. Its application sometimes requires a technique known as 'bridging\\\" to prevent ulcerations caused by delivery port and tubing when positioning the device, which requires extra time and resources. The bridging technique may be adopted when it is considered essential to move the NPWT delivery port away from the wound bed or when treating wounds in close proximity to each other.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A survey was undertaken by 200 health care professionals (HCPs) in the United States who are experienced in utilizing traditional negative pressure wound therapy (tNPWT) and bridging. Primary objectives were to explore HCP opinion on 2 types of tNPWT delivery ports (soft and hard) between 2 leading manufacturers. Questions focused on the need for bridging, alleviation of complexity in application, and reducing concerns relating to medical device-related pressure injury when applied to awkward anatomical areas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HCPs (75%; n=150) largely agreed that the bridging technique makes application of tNPWT slightly more challenging. Reasons included additional time taken to apply (74%; n=148), increased dressing resource (67%; n=134), and additional staff required (50%; n=100). Over half (53%; n=106) agreed that the soft port can eliminate the need for bridging. The majority of wound specialists were significantly less likely to favor a hard port (58%; n=116). Two further potential benefits of using a tNPWT soft port include the associated risk of pain/pressure when applying a hard port over a smaller wound size (29%; n=58) and certain anatomical areas which pose a risk of pressure injury or kinked/twisted tubing (31%; n=62).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>tNPWT soft ports remain effective regardless of kinks or twists and can eliminate bridging in anatomical areas where patients may weight-bear on tubing or delivery ports, saving time and decreasing risks of periwound trauma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice\",\"volume\":\"37 3\",\"pages\":\"107-113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:负压创面治疗(NPWT)是一种有效的治疗多指征挑战性创面的干预手段。它的应用有时需要一种称为“桥接”的技术,以防止在定位设备时由输送口和管道引起的溃疡,这需要额外的时间和资源。当认为必须将NPWT输送口移离伤口床或治疗彼此靠近的伤口时,可以采用桥接技术。材料和方法:对美国200名具有使用传统负压伤口治疗(tNPWT)和桥接经验的卫生保健专业人员(HCPs)进行了一项调查。主要目的是探讨HCP对两家领先制造商之间两种tNPWT交付端口(软端口和硬端口)的意见。问题集中在需要桥接,减轻应用的复杂性,并减少与医疗器械相关的压力损伤的关注,当应用于尴尬的解剖区域。结果:HCPs (75%;n=150)大部分人同意桥接技术使tNPWT的应用更具挑战性。原因包括申请所需的额外时间(74%;N =148),增加敷料资源(67%;N =134),需要额外的工作人员(50%;n = 100)。超过一半(53%;N =106)同意软端口可以消除桥接的需要。大多数伤口专家明显不太喜欢硬口(58%;n = 116)。使用tNPWT软端口的另外两个潜在好处是,当在较小的伤口上应用硬端口时,疼痛/压力的相关风险(29%;N =58)和某些解剖区域存在压力损伤或扭结/扭曲管的风险(31%;n = 62)。结论:tNPWT软端口无论扭结或扭曲都有效,并且可以消除患者可能承受管道或分娩端口重量的解剖区域的桥接,节省时间并降低创面周围创伤的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Removing the complexities associated with traditional negative pressure wound therapy (tNPWT) bridging applications.

Background: Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is an effective intervention for challenging wounds across multiple indications. Its application sometimes requires a technique known as 'bridging" to prevent ulcerations caused by delivery port and tubing when positioning the device, which requires extra time and resources. The bridging technique may be adopted when it is considered essential to move the NPWT delivery port away from the wound bed or when treating wounds in close proximity to each other.

Materials and methods: A survey was undertaken by 200 health care professionals (HCPs) in the United States who are experienced in utilizing traditional negative pressure wound therapy (tNPWT) and bridging. Primary objectives were to explore HCP opinion on 2 types of tNPWT delivery ports (soft and hard) between 2 leading manufacturers. Questions focused on the need for bridging, alleviation of complexity in application, and reducing concerns relating to medical device-related pressure injury when applied to awkward anatomical areas.

Results: HCPs (75%; n=150) largely agreed that the bridging technique makes application of tNPWT slightly more challenging. Reasons included additional time taken to apply (74%; n=148), increased dressing resource (67%; n=134), and additional staff required (50%; n=100). Over half (53%; n=106) agreed that the soft port can eliminate the need for bridging. The majority of wound specialists were significantly less likely to favor a hard port (58%; n=116). Two further potential benefits of using a tNPWT soft port include the associated risk of pain/pressure when applying a hard port over a smaller wound size (29%; n=58) and certain anatomical areas which pose a risk of pressure injury or kinked/twisted tubing (31%; n=62).

Conclusion: tNPWT soft ports remain effective regardless of kinks or twists and can eliminate bridging in anatomical areas where patients may weight-bear on tubing or delivery ports, saving time and decreasing risks of periwound trauma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wounds is the most widely read, peer-reviewed journal focusing on wound care and wound research. The information disseminated to our readers includes valuable research and commentaries on tissue repair and regeneration, biology and biochemistry of wound healing, and clinical management of various wound etiologies. Our multidisciplinary readership consists of dermatologists, general surgeons, plastic surgeons, vascular surgeons, internal medicine/family practitioners, podiatrists, gerontologists, researchers in industry or academia (PhDs), orthopedic surgeons, infectious disease physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. These practitioners must be well equipped to deal with a myriad of chronic wound conditions affecting their patients including vascular disease, diabetes, obesity, dermatological disorders, and more. Whether dealing with a traumatic wound, a surgical or non-skin wound, a burn injury, or a diabetic foot ulcer, wound care professionals turn to Wounds for the latest in research and practice in this ever-growing field of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信