L M Erdle, K Stevack, C Parzanini, M T Arts, C M Rochman
{"title":"暴露于棉和聚酯微纤维会导致虹鳟鱼幼鱼体内不同的脂肪酸分布和化学污染物(PBDE)浓度。","authors":"L M Erdle, K Stevack, C Parzanini, M T Arts, C M Rochman","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Synthetic and non-synthetic microfibers are found in habitats and wildlife globally. Yet, it remains unclear whether different microfiber types affect fish or increase bioaccumulation of sorbed persistent organic pollutants (POPs). To better understand microfiber effects in fish, we tested different microfiber types (cotton and polyester), and to examine microfibers as a vector of chemicals we tested them with and without chemical mixtures (clean microfibers and microfibers exposed to treated wastewater effluent). The effects on survival, growth, condition indices, and fatty acids, along with bioaccumulation of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), were assessed in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Fish were exposed through their diet to ∼100 microfibers/d for 28 d. Fatty acid contents varied between fish exposed to cotton and polyester microfibers (p < 0.05), but the magnitude of these differences were small and not different when compared to control fish. However, fish that were exposed to microfibers with treated wastewater had significantly lower n-3/n-6 fatty acid ratios compared to fish exposed to microfibers without wastewater (regardless of material type), suggesting higher inflammation and stress levels in treatments with microfibers exposed to wastewater. Finally, fish fed cotton microfibers showed higher concentrations of nona-BDEs. Our research suggests that environmentally relevant concentrations of microfibers cause minimal differences in PBDE concentrations and essential fatty acids, although material type may play a role in chemical bioavailability, especially for cotton. Further, our findings confirm that non-synthetic microfibers (e.g., cotton), show impacts in biota. We thus conclude that microfibers broadly, should be considered as potentially carrying having their own unique suites of contaminants, instead of purely focusing on plastic microfibers in research and policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exposure to Cotton and Polyester Microfibers Leads to Different Fatty Acid Profiles and Chemical Contaminants (PBDE) Concentrations in Juvenile Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).\",\"authors\":\"L M Erdle, K Stevack, C Parzanini, M T Arts, C M Rochman\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Synthetic and non-synthetic microfibers are found in habitats and wildlife globally. Yet, it remains unclear whether different microfiber types affect fish or increase bioaccumulation of sorbed persistent organic pollutants (POPs). To better understand microfiber effects in fish, we tested different microfiber types (cotton and polyester), and to examine microfibers as a vector of chemicals we tested them with and without chemical mixtures (clean microfibers and microfibers exposed to treated wastewater effluent). The effects on survival, growth, condition indices, and fatty acids, along with bioaccumulation of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), were assessed in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Fish were exposed through their diet to ∼100 microfibers/d for 28 d. Fatty acid contents varied between fish exposed to cotton and polyester microfibers (p < 0.05), but the magnitude of these differences were small and not different when compared to control fish. However, fish that were exposed to microfibers with treated wastewater had significantly lower n-3/n-6 fatty acid ratios compared to fish exposed to microfibers without wastewater (regardless of material type), suggesting higher inflammation and stress levels in treatments with microfibers exposed to wastewater. Finally, fish fed cotton microfibers showed higher concentrations of nona-BDEs. Our research suggests that environmentally relevant concentrations of microfibers cause minimal differences in PBDE concentrations and essential fatty acids, although material type may play a role in chemical bioavailability, especially for cotton. Further, our findings confirm that non-synthetic microfibers (e.g., cotton), show impacts in biota. We thus conclude that microfibers broadly, should be considered as potentially carrying having their own unique suites of contaminants, instead of purely focusing on plastic microfibers in research and policy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf093\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
合成和非合成微纤维在全球的栖息地和野生动物中都有发现。然而,目前尚不清楚不同类型的微纤维是否会影响鱼类或增加吸收的持久性有机污染物(POPs)的生物积累。为了更好地了解超细纤维对鱼类的影响,我们测试了不同类型的超细纤维(棉纤维和聚酯纤维),并检查了超细纤维作为化学物质载体的情况,我们对它们进行了有和没有化学混合物的测试(清洁的超细纤维和暴露于处理过的废水的超细纤维)。研究了多溴联苯醚(PBDEs)对虹鳟(Oncorhynchus mykiss)的生存、生长、状态指标和脂肪酸的影响,以及多溴联苯醚(PBDEs)的生物积累。鱼在饲料中暴露于约100个微纤维/d,持续28 d
Exposure to Cotton and Polyester Microfibers Leads to Different Fatty Acid Profiles and Chemical Contaminants (PBDE) Concentrations in Juvenile Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).
Synthetic and non-synthetic microfibers are found in habitats and wildlife globally. Yet, it remains unclear whether different microfiber types affect fish or increase bioaccumulation of sorbed persistent organic pollutants (POPs). To better understand microfiber effects in fish, we tested different microfiber types (cotton and polyester), and to examine microfibers as a vector of chemicals we tested them with and without chemical mixtures (clean microfibers and microfibers exposed to treated wastewater effluent). The effects on survival, growth, condition indices, and fatty acids, along with bioaccumulation of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), were assessed in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Fish were exposed through their diet to ∼100 microfibers/d for 28 d. Fatty acid contents varied between fish exposed to cotton and polyester microfibers (p < 0.05), but the magnitude of these differences were small and not different when compared to control fish. However, fish that were exposed to microfibers with treated wastewater had significantly lower n-3/n-6 fatty acid ratios compared to fish exposed to microfibers without wastewater (regardless of material type), suggesting higher inflammation and stress levels in treatments with microfibers exposed to wastewater. Finally, fish fed cotton microfibers showed higher concentrations of nona-BDEs. Our research suggests that environmentally relevant concentrations of microfibers cause minimal differences in PBDE concentrations and essential fatty acids, although material type may play a role in chemical bioavailability, especially for cotton. Further, our findings confirm that non-synthetic microfibers (e.g., cotton), show impacts in biota. We thus conclude that microfibers broadly, should be considered as potentially carrying having their own unique suites of contaminants, instead of purely focusing on plastic microfibers in research and policy.
期刊介绍:
The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...]
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.