重要的时候该说什么:解决隐性偏见的沟通技巧研讨会。

Q3 Medicine
Bria McKenzie, Dhanya Mahesh, Elena Gupta, Phuong Pham, Adina Harri, Erin M Knight, Bich T N Tran, Arvind Suresh, Maya Ellis, Nan Cochran, Alison Kapadia
{"title":"重要的时候该说什么:解决隐性偏见的沟通技巧研讨会。","authors":"Bria McKenzie, Dhanya Mahesh, Elena Gupta, Phuong Pham, Adina Harri, Erin M Knight, Bich T N Tran, Arvind Suresh, Maya Ellis, Nan Cochran, Alison Kapadia","doi":"10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In academic medicine, learners, faculty, and staff commonly experience microaggressions, which have been linked to multiple negative outcomes (e.g., higher levels of depression, deteriorating well-being, increased anxiety, and feelings of isolation). Workshops teaching communication skills can reduce barriers in responding to microaggressions. Our workshops included students, faculty, and staff as both participants and cofacilitators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Each 2-hour, in-person workshop began with a large-group didactic. Next, cofacilitators led skills practice responding to microaggressions. Small-group cofacilitators underwent standardized training. Student and faculty/staff participants were surveyed after each workshop. We conducted factorial analyses of variance comparing the main effects of time, role (student vs. staff/faculty), and prior knowledge, as well as the interaction effects between time and role and between time and prior knowledge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen workshops were conducted between 2022 and 2023. Students attended four of the workshops, and faculty/staff participated in 10. Participants reported greater knowledge (<i>p</i> < .001) and comfort (<i>p</i> < .001) identifying and responding to microaggressions after the workshop. The interactions between time and role and between time and prior knowledge on the dependent variables knowledge and comfort were significant (knowledge: <i>p</i> < .01; comfort: <i>p</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Active learning workshops constitute an effective method for teaching communication skills to address implicit bias in academic medicine. Including students as cocreators allows for greater relevance for student participants and authenticity for the student experience. Future directions include examining data on cofacilitator experiences and comparing outcomes for students versus faculty/staff.</p>","PeriodicalId":36910,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources","volume":"21 ","pages":"11514"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11997152/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What to Say When It Matters: Communication Skills to Address Implicit Bias Workshop.\",\"authors\":\"Bria McKenzie, Dhanya Mahesh, Elena Gupta, Phuong Pham, Adina Harri, Erin M Knight, Bich T N Tran, Arvind Suresh, Maya Ellis, Nan Cochran, Alison Kapadia\",\"doi\":\"10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11514\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In academic medicine, learners, faculty, and staff commonly experience microaggressions, which have been linked to multiple negative outcomes (e.g., higher levels of depression, deteriorating well-being, increased anxiety, and feelings of isolation). Workshops teaching communication skills can reduce barriers in responding to microaggressions. Our workshops included students, faculty, and staff as both participants and cofacilitators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Each 2-hour, in-person workshop began with a large-group didactic. Next, cofacilitators led skills practice responding to microaggressions. Small-group cofacilitators underwent standardized training. Student and faculty/staff participants were surveyed after each workshop. We conducted factorial analyses of variance comparing the main effects of time, role (student vs. staff/faculty), and prior knowledge, as well as the interaction effects between time and role and between time and prior knowledge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen workshops were conducted between 2022 and 2023. Students attended four of the workshops, and faculty/staff participated in 10. Participants reported greater knowledge (<i>p</i> < .001) and comfort (<i>p</i> < .001) identifying and responding to microaggressions after the workshop. The interactions between time and role and between time and prior knowledge on the dependent variables knowledge and comfort were significant (knowledge: <i>p</i> < .01; comfort: <i>p</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Active learning workshops constitute an effective method for teaching communication skills to address implicit bias in academic medicine. Including students as cocreators allows for greater relevance for student participants and authenticity for the student experience. Future directions include examining data on cofacilitator experiences and comparing outcomes for students versus faculty/staff.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources\",\"volume\":\"21 \",\"pages\":\"11514\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11997152/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11514\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:在学术医学中,学习者、教师和工作人员通常会经历微侵犯,这与多种负面结果有关(例如,更高程度的抑郁、幸福感恶化、焦虑增加和孤独感)。教授沟通技巧的讲习班可以减少应对微侵犯的障碍。我们的研讨会包括学生,教师和工作人员作为参与者和共同调解人。方法:每个2小时的现场研讨会以大型小组教学开始。接下来,辅助辅导员指导应对微侵犯的技能练习。小组协理员接受标准化培训。每次研讨会结束后,学生和教职员工都接受了调查。我们进行了方差的析因分析,比较了时间、角色(学生与教职员工)和先验知识的主要影响,以及时间与角色之间、时间与先验知识之间的交互影响。结果:在2022年至2023年期间共举办了14次研讨会。学生参加了4个讲习班,教职员工参加了10个。参与者在研讨会后报告了更大的知识(p < 0.001)和舒适度(p < 0.001)识别和应对微侵犯。时间与角色、时间与先验知识对因变量知识和舒适度的交互作用显著(知识:p < 0.01;舒适度:p < 0.05)。讨论:主动学习工作坊是教授沟通技巧以解决学术医学中的内隐偏见的有效方法。让学生成为共同创作者,可以让学生参与者更有相关性,让学生体验更真实。未来的方向包括检查共同调解人经验的数据,并比较学生与教师/工作人员的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What to Say When It Matters: Communication Skills to Address Implicit Bias Workshop.

Introduction: In academic medicine, learners, faculty, and staff commonly experience microaggressions, which have been linked to multiple negative outcomes (e.g., higher levels of depression, deteriorating well-being, increased anxiety, and feelings of isolation). Workshops teaching communication skills can reduce barriers in responding to microaggressions. Our workshops included students, faculty, and staff as both participants and cofacilitators.

Methods: Each 2-hour, in-person workshop began with a large-group didactic. Next, cofacilitators led skills practice responding to microaggressions. Small-group cofacilitators underwent standardized training. Student and faculty/staff participants were surveyed after each workshop. We conducted factorial analyses of variance comparing the main effects of time, role (student vs. staff/faculty), and prior knowledge, as well as the interaction effects between time and role and between time and prior knowledge.

Results: Fourteen workshops were conducted between 2022 and 2023. Students attended four of the workshops, and faculty/staff participated in 10. Participants reported greater knowledge (p < .001) and comfort (p < .001) identifying and responding to microaggressions after the workshop. The interactions between time and role and between time and prior knowledge on the dependent variables knowledge and comfort were significant (knowledge: p < .01; comfort: p < .05).

Discussion: Active learning workshops constitute an effective method for teaching communication skills to address implicit bias in academic medicine. Including students as cocreators allows for greater relevance for student participants and authenticity for the student experience. Future directions include examining data on cofacilitator experiences and comparing outcomes for students versus faculty/staff.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信