Thu-Trang Pham, Hong Thuy Pham Thi, Cao Binh Tran, Ngoc Quang Dong, Viet Hoang
{"title":"预测使用透明矫正器治疗深咬合矫正时覆盖咬合的改善。","authors":"Thu-Trang Pham, Hong Thuy Pham Thi, Cao Binh Tran, Ngoc Quang Dong, Viet Hoang","doi":"10.4103/jos.jos_87_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to determine the accuracy of overbite correction in patients with deep bite using the clear aligner therapy (CAT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 31 patients prescribed orthodontic treatment using CAT from January 2020 to January 2024. Clinical information was collected via X-ray results at pre-treatment and post-treatment stages. Treatment outcomes were measured at three stages: pre-treatment, post-treatment (clinical results), and predict treatment (predict results) as programmed in ClinCheck®.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant changes were observed in X-ray in both overbite (3.85 ± 1.38 mm to 2.93 ± 1.13 mm) and overjet (5.19 ± 1.79 mm to 3.43 ± 1.14 mm) following CAT. For clinical crown lengthening (CCL) of tooth 31, significant differences were noted between pre-treatment and post-treatment (-0.31 ± 0.66 mm) and between predicted and clinical results (-0.21 ± 0.58 mm). For CCL of tooth 41, significant differences were found between pre-treatment and post-treatment (-0.36 ± 0.66 mm) and between prediction and post-treatment (-0.32 ± 0.65 mm). The percentage of deep bites differed significantly between pre-treatment vs predicted treatment (38.10 ± 14.90%), pre-treatment vs post-treatment (11.80 ± 14.30%), and predicted treatment vs post-treatment (-26.40 ± 12.60%). Similar trends were observed in mean overbite (2.77 ± 1.07 mm, 0.69 ± 0.93 mm, and - 2.08 ± 0.83 mm, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings support the use of CAT as a reliable and aesthetic option for treating deep bite malocclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","volume":"14 ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036758/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of overbite improvement in deep bite correction using clear aligner therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Thu-Trang Pham, Hong Thuy Pham Thi, Cao Binh Tran, Ngoc Quang Dong, Viet Hoang\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jos.jos_87_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to determine the accuracy of overbite correction in patients with deep bite using the clear aligner therapy (CAT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 31 patients prescribed orthodontic treatment using CAT from January 2020 to January 2024. Clinical information was collected via X-ray results at pre-treatment and post-treatment stages. Treatment outcomes were measured at three stages: pre-treatment, post-treatment (clinical results), and predict treatment (predict results) as programmed in ClinCheck®.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant changes were observed in X-ray in both overbite (3.85 ± 1.38 mm to 2.93 ± 1.13 mm) and overjet (5.19 ± 1.79 mm to 3.43 ± 1.14 mm) following CAT. For clinical crown lengthening (CCL) of tooth 31, significant differences were noted between pre-treatment and post-treatment (-0.31 ± 0.66 mm) and between predicted and clinical results (-0.21 ± 0.58 mm). For CCL of tooth 41, significant differences were found between pre-treatment and post-treatment (-0.36 ± 0.66 mm) and between prediction and post-treatment (-0.32 ± 0.65 mm). The percentage of deep bites differed significantly between pre-treatment vs predicted treatment (38.10 ± 14.90%), pre-treatment vs post-treatment (11.80 ± 14.30%), and predicted treatment vs post-treatment (-26.40 ± 12.60%). Similar trends were observed in mean overbite (2.77 ± 1.07 mm, 0.69 ± 0.93 mm, and - 2.08 ± 0.83 mm, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings support the use of CAT as a reliable and aesthetic option for treating deep bite malocclusions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthodontic Science\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036758/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthodontic Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_87_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_87_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在确定在深咬合患者中使用透明矫正器(clear aligner therapy, CAT)进行复咬合矫正的准确性。材料和方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2020年1月至2024年1月31例使用CAT进行正畸治疗的患者。通过治疗前和治疗后的x线结果收集临床信息。治疗结果分为三个阶段:治疗前、治疗后(临床结果)和预测治疗(预测结果),如ClinCheck®程序所述。结果:CAT术后复牙合(3.85±1.38 mm ~ 2.93±1.13 mm)和复牙合(5.19±1.79 mm ~ 3.43±1.14 mm) x线变化明显。对于31号牙的临床冠延长(CCL),治疗前与治疗后差异显著(-0.31±0.66 mm),预测与临床结果差异显著(-0.21±0.58 mm)。41号牙CCL治疗前与治疗后差异显著(-0.36±0.66 mm),预测与治疗后差异显著(-0.32±0.65 mm)。治疗前与预测治疗(38.10±14.90%)、治疗前与治疗后(11.80±14.30%)、预测治疗与治疗后(-26.40±12.60%)的深度咬伤比例差异显著。平均复咬合为2.77±1.07 mm, 0.69±0.93 mm, - 2.08±0.83 mm。结论:我们的研究结果支持使用CAT作为治疗深咬合错的可靠和美观的选择。
Prediction of overbite improvement in deep bite correction using clear aligner therapy.
Objectives: This study aimed to determine the accuracy of overbite correction in patients with deep bite using the clear aligner therapy (CAT).
Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 31 patients prescribed orthodontic treatment using CAT from January 2020 to January 2024. Clinical information was collected via X-ray results at pre-treatment and post-treatment stages. Treatment outcomes were measured at three stages: pre-treatment, post-treatment (clinical results), and predict treatment (predict results) as programmed in ClinCheck®.
Results: Significant changes were observed in X-ray in both overbite (3.85 ± 1.38 mm to 2.93 ± 1.13 mm) and overjet (5.19 ± 1.79 mm to 3.43 ± 1.14 mm) following CAT. For clinical crown lengthening (CCL) of tooth 31, significant differences were noted between pre-treatment and post-treatment (-0.31 ± 0.66 mm) and between predicted and clinical results (-0.21 ± 0.58 mm). For CCL of tooth 41, significant differences were found between pre-treatment and post-treatment (-0.36 ± 0.66 mm) and between prediction and post-treatment (-0.32 ± 0.65 mm). The percentage of deep bites differed significantly between pre-treatment vs predicted treatment (38.10 ± 14.90%), pre-treatment vs post-treatment (11.80 ± 14.30%), and predicted treatment vs post-treatment (-26.40 ± 12.60%). Similar trends were observed in mean overbite (2.77 ± 1.07 mm, 0.69 ± 0.93 mm, and - 2.08 ± 0.83 mm, respectively).
Conclusions: Our findings support the use of CAT as a reliable and aesthetic option for treating deep bite malocclusions.