年轻人大麻使用的实时前因:一项生态瞬时评估研究。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Timothy Regan, Janardan Devkota, Julia McQuoid, Kekoa Lopez-Paguyo, Nhung Nguyen, Meredith C Meacham, Pamela M Ling, Johannes Thrul
{"title":"年轻人大麻使用的实时前因:一项生态瞬时评估研究。","authors":"Timothy Regan, Janardan Devkota, Julia McQuoid, Kekoa Lopez-Paguyo, Nhung Nguyen, Meredith C Meacham, Pamela M Ling, Johannes Thrul","doi":"10.1037/pha0000775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Knowledge regarding in-the-moment antecedents of cannabis use is lacking. We examined internal (e.g., mood, cravings) and external (e.g., locations, people) antecedents of cannabis use among young adults regularly using both cannabis and tobacco. Over 30 days, 36 young adults (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 24.2 years, 33% female, 8% nonbinary, 61% sexual minority, 44% Non-Hispanic White) completed multiple daily Ecological Momentary Assessment surveys, totaling 1,632 prompts. Generalized estimating equations estimated population-averaged relationships between the presence of antecedents and cannabis use outcomes (use vs. nonuse). Overall cannabis use was likelier at neutral ranges of affect (a<i>OR</i> = 0.95; 95% CI [0.91, 1.00]) and affective arousal (a<i>OR</i> = 1.52; 95% CI [0.91, 1.00], see Footnote 1), higher cannabis craving (a<i>OR</i> = 1.52; 95% CI [1.31, 1.76]), and substance intoxication (a<i>OR</i> = 1.25; 95% CI [1.01, 1.55]). Overall use was likelier at home (a<i>OR</i> = 1.97; 95% CI [1.16, 3.37]), and less likely in a place where cannabis smoking was forbidden (a<i>OR</i> = 0.46; 95% CI [0.25, 0.85]) or more people were present (a<i>OR</i> = 0.91; 95% CI [0.87, 0.96]). Other antecedents of use were seeing cannabis product packaging (a<i>OR</i> = 1.91; 95% CI [1.07, 3.39]) and experiencing racial/ethnic-based discrimination (a<i>OR</i> = 2.26; 95% CI [1.39, 3.69]). Future digital interventions for cannabis use will benefit from (a) testing real-time interactions between internal and external antecedents and (b) triggering interventions while users are at home alone, after discrimination experiences, and/or when feeling mild, neutral affect. <i>Note: CIs containing 1.00 interpreted as statistically significant are due to having rounded up to the upper limit</i>. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":12089,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-time antecedents of cannabis use among young adults: An Ecological Momentary Assessment study.\",\"authors\":\"Timothy Regan, Janardan Devkota, Julia McQuoid, Kekoa Lopez-Paguyo, Nhung Nguyen, Meredith C Meacham, Pamela M Ling, Johannes Thrul\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/pha0000775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Knowledge regarding in-the-moment antecedents of cannabis use is lacking. We examined internal (e.g., mood, cravings) and external (e.g., locations, people) antecedents of cannabis use among young adults regularly using both cannabis and tobacco. Over 30 days, 36 young adults (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 24.2 years, 33% female, 8% nonbinary, 61% sexual minority, 44% Non-Hispanic White) completed multiple daily Ecological Momentary Assessment surveys, totaling 1,632 prompts. Generalized estimating equations estimated population-averaged relationships between the presence of antecedents and cannabis use outcomes (use vs. nonuse). Overall cannabis use was likelier at neutral ranges of affect (a<i>OR</i> = 0.95; 95% CI [0.91, 1.00]) and affective arousal (a<i>OR</i> = 1.52; 95% CI [0.91, 1.00], see Footnote 1), higher cannabis craving (a<i>OR</i> = 1.52; 95% CI [1.31, 1.76]), and substance intoxication (a<i>OR</i> = 1.25; 95% CI [1.01, 1.55]). Overall use was likelier at home (a<i>OR</i> = 1.97; 95% CI [1.16, 3.37]), and less likely in a place where cannabis smoking was forbidden (a<i>OR</i> = 0.46; 95% CI [0.25, 0.85]) or more people were present (a<i>OR</i> = 0.91; 95% CI [0.87, 0.96]). Other antecedents of use were seeing cannabis product packaging (a<i>OR</i> = 1.91; 95% CI [1.07, 3.39]) and experiencing racial/ethnic-based discrimination (a<i>OR</i> = 2.26; 95% CI [1.39, 3.69]). Future digital interventions for cannabis use will benefit from (a) testing real-time interactions between internal and external antecedents and (b) triggering interventions while users are at home alone, after discrimination experiences, and/or when feeling mild, neutral affect. <i>Note: CIs containing 1.00 interpreted as statistically significant are due to having rounded up to the upper limit</i>. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000775\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000775","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

缺乏关于大麻使用的即时前因的知识。我们检查了经常使用大麻和烟草的年轻人使用大麻的内部(例如,情绪,渴望)和外部(例如,地点,人)前因。在30天内,36名年轻人(年龄24.2岁,33%为女性,8%为非二元性别,61%为性少数,44%为非西班牙裔白人)完成了多项每日生态瞬时评估调查,共计1,632个提示。广义估计方程估计了前因和大麻使用结果(使用与不使用)之间的人口平均关系。总体大麻使用在中性影响范围内的可能性更大(aOR = 0.95;95% CI[0.91, 1.00])和情感唤醒(aOR = 1.52;95% CI[0.91, 1.00],见脚注1),对大麻的渴望程度较高(aOR = 1.52;95% CI[1.31, 1.76])和物质中毒(aOR = 1.25;95% ci[1.01, 1.55])。总体而言,在家中使用的可能性更大(aOR = 1.97;95% CI[1.16, 3.37]),而在禁止吸食大麻的地方(aOR = 0.46;95% CI[0.25, 0.85])或更多的人在场(aOR = 0.91;95% ci[0.87, 0.96])。其他使用前因是看到大麻产品包装(aOR = 1.91;95% CI[1.07, 3.39])和遭受种族/民族歧视(aOR = 2.26;95% ci[1.39, 3.69])。未来的大麻使用数字干预措施将受益于:(a)测试内部和外部前因之间的实时互动,以及(b)在使用者独自在家、经历歧视之后和/或感觉轻微、中性影响时触发干预措施。注:包含1.00的ci被解释为统计显著是由于已四舍五入到上限。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-time antecedents of cannabis use among young adults: An Ecological Momentary Assessment study.

Knowledge regarding in-the-moment antecedents of cannabis use is lacking. We examined internal (e.g., mood, cravings) and external (e.g., locations, people) antecedents of cannabis use among young adults regularly using both cannabis and tobacco. Over 30 days, 36 young adults (Mage = 24.2 years, 33% female, 8% nonbinary, 61% sexual minority, 44% Non-Hispanic White) completed multiple daily Ecological Momentary Assessment surveys, totaling 1,632 prompts. Generalized estimating equations estimated population-averaged relationships between the presence of antecedents and cannabis use outcomes (use vs. nonuse). Overall cannabis use was likelier at neutral ranges of affect (aOR = 0.95; 95% CI [0.91, 1.00]) and affective arousal (aOR = 1.52; 95% CI [0.91, 1.00], see Footnote 1), higher cannabis craving (aOR = 1.52; 95% CI [1.31, 1.76]), and substance intoxication (aOR = 1.25; 95% CI [1.01, 1.55]). Overall use was likelier at home (aOR = 1.97; 95% CI [1.16, 3.37]), and less likely in a place where cannabis smoking was forbidden (aOR = 0.46; 95% CI [0.25, 0.85]) or more people were present (aOR = 0.91; 95% CI [0.87, 0.96]). Other antecedents of use were seeing cannabis product packaging (aOR = 1.91; 95% CI [1.07, 3.39]) and experiencing racial/ethnic-based discrimination (aOR = 2.26; 95% CI [1.39, 3.69]). Future digital interventions for cannabis use will benefit from (a) testing real-time interactions between internal and external antecedents and (b) triggering interventions while users are at home alone, after discrimination experiences, and/or when feeling mild, neutral affect. Note: CIs containing 1.00 interpreted as statistically significant are due to having rounded up to the upper limit. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
164
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology publishes advances in translational and interdisciplinary research on psychopharmacology, broadly defined, and/or substance abuse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信