一种新的胆囊癌患者预后图的建立和验证。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Rongqiang Liu, Chenxuan Zhang, Yankun Shen, Jianguo Wang, Jing Ye, Jia Yu, Weixing Wang
{"title":"一种新的胆囊癌患者预后图的建立和验证。","authors":"Rongqiang Liu, Chenxuan Zhang, Yankun Shen, Jianguo Wang, Jing Ye, Jia Yu, Weixing Wang","doi":"10.1186/s40001-025-02513-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gallbladder cancer (GBC) arises from the malignant transformation of epithelial cells that line the gallbladder mucosa. The likelihood of developing GBC escalates with advancing age, and the condition generally presents a dismal prognosis. Despite this, there is a limited amount of research focusing on the prognostic determinants linked to GBC. As a result, this study sought to create a nomogram for evaluating GBC prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this investigation, a total of 8,615 cases of GBC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database spanning from 2000 to 2020 were collected. In a 7:3 ratio, these instances were randomly assigned to one of two groups: training or internal validation. To assess the impact of clinical variables on overall survival (OS) in patients with GBC, both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were utilized. The clinical criteria established were used to develop a nomogram. The effectiveness of the nomogram was evaluated through several approaches, such as receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), calibration curves, and Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>To predict the prognosis of GBC patients, a nomogram was created based on the following criteria: sex, rural-urban continuum, marital status, nodes, histology, radiation, chemotherapy, metastasis, age, surgery, and grade. The training set had an area under the curve for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS of 0.79, 0.78, and 0.78, respectively. The DCA curves demonstrated that the model was clinically useful and well-corrected. Patients with GBC were categorized into high-risk and low-risk groups based on the median risk score. KM curves revealed a significantly lower survival rate for the high-risk group in comparison with the low-risk group (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our model demonstrated strong predictive capabilities for the prognosis of GBC patients, thereby aiding in the refinement of treatment strategies for these individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":11949,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Medical Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"331"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12032734/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishment and validation of a novel prognostic nomogram for gallbladder cancer patients.\",\"authors\":\"Rongqiang Liu, Chenxuan Zhang, Yankun Shen, Jianguo Wang, Jing Ye, Jia Yu, Weixing Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40001-025-02513-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gallbladder cancer (GBC) arises from the malignant transformation of epithelial cells that line the gallbladder mucosa. The likelihood of developing GBC escalates with advancing age, and the condition generally presents a dismal prognosis. Despite this, there is a limited amount of research focusing on the prognostic determinants linked to GBC. As a result, this study sought to create a nomogram for evaluating GBC prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this investigation, a total of 8,615 cases of GBC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database spanning from 2000 to 2020 were collected. In a 7:3 ratio, these instances were randomly assigned to one of two groups: training or internal validation. To assess the impact of clinical variables on overall survival (OS) in patients with GBC, both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were utilized. The clinical criteria established were used to develop a nomogram. The effectiveness of the nomogram was evaluated through several approaches, such as receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), calibration curves, and Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>To predict the prognosis of GBC patients, a nomogram was created based on the following criteria: sex, rural-urban continuum, marital status, nodes, histology, radiation, chemotherapy, metastasis, age, surgery, and grade. The training set had an area under the curve for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS of 0.79, 0.78, and 0.78, respectively. The DCA curves demonstrated that the model was clinically useful and well-corrected. Patients with GBC were categorized into high-risk and low-risk groups based on the median risk score. KM curves revealed a significantly lower survival rate for the high-risk group in comparison with the low-risk group (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our model demonstrated strong predictive capabilities for the prognosis of GBC patients, thereby aiding in the refinement of treatment strategies for these individuals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"331\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12032734/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02513-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02513-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胆囊癌(GBC)起源于胆囊粘膜上皮细胞的恶性转化。发展为GBC的可能性随着年龄的增长而增加,并且这种情况通常呈现出令人沮丧的预后。尽管如此,关注与GBC相关的预后决定因素的研究数量有限。因此,本研究试图创建一个nomogram来评估GBC的预后因素。方法:在本次调查中,从2000年至2020年的监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中收集了8,615例GBC病例。以7:3的比例,这些实例被随机分配到两组中的一组:训练组或内部验证组。为了评估临床变量对GBC患者总生存期(OS)的影响,采用单因素和多因素Cox回归分析。所建立的临床标准被用于发展线图。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、决策曲线分析(DCA)、校准曲线和Kaplan-Meier (KM)分析等多种方法评估nomogram的有效性。结果:为了预测GBC患者的预后,根据以下标准创建了一个nomogram:性别、城乡连续性、婚姻状况、淋巴结、组织学、放疗、化疗、转移、年龄、手术和分级。训练集1年、3年和5年OS的曲线下面积分别为0.79、0.78和0.78。DCA曲线表明该模型在临床上是有用的,并且得到了很好的校正。根据中位风险评分将GBC患者分为高危组和低危组。KM曲线显示,与低风险组相比,高危组的生存率明显较低(P)。结论:我们的模型对GBC患者的预后具有很强的预测能力,从而有助于改进这些个体的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Establishment and validation of a novel prognostic nomogram for gallbladder cancer patients.

Background: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) arises from the malignant transformation of epithelial cells that line the gallbladder mucosa. The likelihood of developing GBC escalates with advancing age, and the condition generally presents a dismal prognosis. Despite this, there is a limited amount of research focusing on the prognostic determinants linked to GBC. As a result, this study sought to create a nomogram for evaluating GBC prognostic factors.

Methods: In this investigation, a total of 8,615 cases of GBC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database spanning from 2000 to 2020 were collected. In a 7:3 ratio, these instances were randomly assigned to one of two groups: training or internal validation. To assess the impact of clinical variables on overall survival (OS) in patients with GBC, both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were utilized. The clinical criteria established were used to develop a nomogram. The effectiveness of the nomogram was evaluated through several approaches, such as receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), calibration curves, and Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis.

Results: To predict the prognosis of GBC patients, a nomogram was created based on the following criteria: sex, rural-urban continuum, marital status, nodes, histology, radiation, chemotherapy, metastasis, age, surgery, and grade. The training set had an area under the curve for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS of 0.79, 0.78, and 0.78, respectively. The DCA curves demonstrated that the model was clinically useful and well-corrected. Patients with GBC were categorized into high-risk and low-risk groups based on the median risk score. KM curves revealed a significantly lower survival rate for the high-risk group in comparison with the low-risk group (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Our model demonstrated strong predictive capabilities for the prognosis of GBC patients, thereby aiding in the refinement of treatment strategies for these individuals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Medical Research
European Journal of Medical Research 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
247
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Medical Research publishes translational and clinical research of international interest across all medical disciplines, enabling clinicians and other researchers to learn about developments and innovations within these disciplines and across the boundaries between disciplines. The journal publishes high quality research and reviews and aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted research are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信