网膜游离皮瓣治疗淋巴水肿疗效的系统评价。

IF 1.5 Q3 SURGERY
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2025-04-25 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006716
Fizzah Arif, Nida Sehar, Bareera Ahmed Mian, Safdar Ali Shaikh, Mohammad Fazlur Rahman
{"title":"网膜游离皮瓣治疗淋巴水肿疗效的系统评价。","authors":"Fizzah Arif, Nida Sehar, Bareera Ahmed Mian, Safdar Ali Shaikh, Mohammad Fazlur Rahman","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The omentum has unique angiogenic and immunologic properties, and its low risk of donor-site lymphedema makes it an ideal donor site for lymph node transfer. However, it is unpopular due to the technicalities and the possibility of donor site-related abdominal complications during its harvest.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted on March 24, 2024, using PubMed, Scopus, and Ovid MEDLINE databases. The search terms \"omental flap,\" \"omentum flap,\" \"lymphedema,\" and \"free flap\" yielded 99 articles. Only 7 full-text articles published within the past 25 years focusing on omental free flap for lymphedema management were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review included 7 studies comprising 131 patients, predominantly women, with an average age of 54.75 years, most of whom had secondary lymphedema, primarily due to breast cancer. Clinical outcome measures showed significant limb volume reduction and improved lymphatic drainage, whereas patient-reported outcome measures indicated overall patient satisfaction and improved quality of life. The flap failure rate was 0.75%, and partial flap necrosis occurred in 2.25% of cases. Common donor-site complications included abdominal tension (2.29%) and dyspepsia (1.53%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review highlights the promising outcomes of omental free flap in lymphedema management, with low complication rates and significant improvements in both clinical and patient-reported outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 4","pages":"e6716"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12026373/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Review of Outcomes of Omental Free Flap in the Management of Lymphedema.\",\"authors\":\"Fizzah Arif, Nida Sehar, Bareera Ahmed Mian, Safdar Ali Shaikh, Mohammad Fazlur Rahman\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The omentum has unique angiogenic and immunologic properties, and its low risk of donor-site lymphedema makes it an ideal donor site for lymph node transfer. However, it is unpopular due to the technicalities and the possibility of donor site-related abdominal complications during its harvest.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted on March 24, 2024, using PubMed, Scopus, and Ovid MEDLINE databases. The search terms \\\"omental flap,\\\" \\\"omentum flap,\\\" \\\"lymphedema,\\\" and \\\"free flap\\\" yielded 99 articles. Only 7 full-text articles published within the past 25 years focusing on omental free flap for lymphedema management were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review included 7 studies comprising 131 patients, predominantly women, with an average age of 54.75 years, most of whom had secondary lymphedema, primarily due to breast cancer. Clinical outcome measures showed significant limb volume reduction and improved lymphatic drainage, whereas patient-reported outcome measures indicated overall patient satisfaction and improved quality of life. The flap failure rate was 0.75%, and partial flap necrosis occurred in 2.25% of cases. Common donor-site complications included abdominal tension (2.29%) and dyspepsia (1.53%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review highlights the promising outcomes of omental free flap in lymphedema management, with low complication rates and significant improvements in both clinical and patient-reported outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"e6716\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12026373/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006716\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大网膜具有独特的血管生成和免疫特性,其低风险的供区淋巴水肿使其成为理想的淋巴结转移供区。然而,由于技术上的问题以及在采集过程中与供体部位相关的腹部并发症的可能性,它不受欢迎。方法:于2024年3月24日使用PubMed、Scopus和Ovid MEDLINE数据库进行系统评价。搜索关键词“网膜皮瓣”、“网膜皮瓣”、“淋巴水肿”和“自由皮瓣”得到99篇文章。在过去的25年里,我们只收录了7篇关于网膜游离皮瓣治疗淋巴水肿的全文文章。结果:本综述纳入7项研究,共131例患者,主要为女性,平均年龄54.75岁,其中大多数患者继发性淋巴水肿,主要由乳腺癌引起。临床结果测量显示显著的肢体体积缩小和淋巴引流改善,而患者报告的结果测量显示总体患者满意度和生活质量改善。皮瓣失败率为0.75%,部分皮瓣坏死率为2.25%。常见的供区并发症包括腹部紧张(2.29%)和消化不良(1.53%)。结论:本系统综述强调了网膜游离皮瓣治疗淋巴水肿的良好结果,其并发症发生率低,临床和患者报告的结果均有显着改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematic Review of Outcomes of Omental Free Flap in the Management of Lymphedema.

Background: The omentum has unique angiogenic and immunologic properties, and its low risk of donor-site lymphedema makes it an ideal donor site for lymph node transfer. However, it is unpopular due to the technicalities and the possibility of donor site-related abdominal complications during its harvest.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted on March 24, 2024, using PubMed, Scopus, and Ovid MEDLINE databases. The search terms "omental flap," "omentum flap," "lymphedema," and "free flap" yielded 99 articles. Only 7 full-text articles published within the past 25 years focusing on omental free flap for lymphedema management were included.

Results: The review included 7 studies comprising 131 patients, predominantly women, with an average age of 54.75 years, most of whom had secondary lymphedema, primarily due to breast cancer. Clinical outcome measures showed significant limb volume reduction and improved lymphatic drainage, whereas patient-reported outcome measures indicated overall patient satisfaction and improved quality of life. The flap failure rate was 0.75%, and partial flap necrosis occurred in 2.25% of cases. Common donor-site complications included abdominal tension (2.29%) and dyspepsia (1.53%).

Conclusions: This systematic review highlights the promising outcomes of omental free flap in lymphedema management, with low complication rates and significant improvements in both clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信