从社会生态角度探讨坦桑尼亚COVID-19疫苗接种的决定因素

IF 0.6 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Public Health in Africa Pub Date : 2025-04-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4102/jphia.v16i3.709
Ambrose T Kessy, Chima E Onuekwe, William M Mwengee, Grace E Saguti, Tumaini Haonga
{"title":"从社会生态角度探讨坦桑尼亚COVID-19疫苗接种的决定因素","authors":"Ambrose T Kessy, Chima E Onuekwe, William M Mwengee, Grace E Saguti, Tumaini Haonga","doi":"10.4102/jphia.v16i3.709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic continues to challenge global public health, with vaccination playing a key role in mitigating transmission. Despite recognising its importance, Tanzania exhibits considerable regional disparities in vaccine uptake. Understanding the determinants influencing vaccination is essential.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study investigated determinants of COVID-19 vaccination rates within Tanzania, employing a socio-ecological framework to comprehensively examine individual, interpersonal, community, and institutional influences.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Eight regions across Tanzania, purposively selected to represent urban, peri-urban, and rural contexts, reflecting varying socio-cultural and infrastructural conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A concurrent mixed-method design was utilised, combining quantitative surveys from 3098 participants with qualitative data collected through focus group discussions and key informant interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although general awareness of COVID-19 was notably high (99.3%), overall vaccine acceptance remained low (37.2%), exhibiting significant regional variations (22.5% in Morogoro to 50.0% in Mtwara). Individual factors such as personal vaccine beliefs, perceived safety, and misinformation significantly impacted uptake. Interpersonal influences from family, friends, and community leaders critically shaped vaccination decisions. Despite high acknowledgment of community leaders' roles (88.3%), governmental campaign awareness was minimal (22.4%). Institutional factors, notably healthcare system trust and vaccine accessibility, also significantly influenced uptake.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings advocate for region-specific, multilevel interventions addressing misinformation, engaging trusted community influencers, improving transparency, and enhancing healthcare service delivery to mitigate disparities and enhance vaccine acceptance.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>The study offers insights foundational for tailored public health strategies, improving vaccine accessibility and resilience against future pandemics in Tanzania and comparable socio-ecological contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":44723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health in Africa","volume":"16 3","pages":"709"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067557/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring determinants of COVID-19 vaccine uptake in Tanzania: A socio-ecological perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Ambrose T Kessy, Chima E Onuekwe, William M Mwengee, Grace E Saguti, Tumaini Haonga\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/jphia.v16i3.709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic continues to challenge global public health, with vaccination playing a key role in mitigating transmission. Despite recognising its importance, Tanzania exhibits considerable regional disparities in vaccine uptake. Understanding the determinants influencing vaccination is essential.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study investigated determinants of COVID-19 vaccination rates within Tanzania, employing a socio-ecological framework to comprehensively examine individual, interpersonal, community, and institutional influences.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Eight regions across Tanzania, purposively selected to represent urban, peri-urban, and rural contexts, reflecting varying socio-cultural and infrastructural conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A concurrent mixed-method design was utilised, combining quantitative surveys from 3098 participants with qualitative data collected through focus group discussions and key informant interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although general awareness of COVID-19 was notably high (99.3%), overall vaccine acceptance remained low (37.2%), exhibiting significant regional variations (22.5% in Morogoro to 50.0% in Mtwara). Individual factors such as personal vaccine beliefs, perceived safety, and misinformation significantly impacted uptake. Interpersonal influences from family, friends, and community leaders critically shaped vaccination decisions. Despite high acknowledgment of community leaders' roles (88.3%), governmental campaign awareness was minimal (22.4%). Institutional factors, notably healthcare system trust and vaccine accessibility, also significantly influenced uptake.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings advocate for region-specific, multilevel interventions addressing misinformation, engaging trusted community influencers, improving transparency, and enhancing healthcare service delivery to mitigate disparities and enhance vaccine acceptance.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>The study offers insights foundational for tailored public health strategies, improving vaccine accessibility and resilience against future pandemics in Tanzania and comparable socio-ecological contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Health in Africa\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"709\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067557/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Health in Africa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/jphia.v16i3.709\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/jphia.v16i3.709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:COVID-19大流行继续对全球公共卫生构成挑战,疫苗接种在减轻传播方面发挥着关键作用。尽管认识到疫苗接种的重要性,但坦桑尼亚在疫苗接种方面存在相当大的区域差异。了解影响疫苗接种的决定因素至关重要。目的:本研究调查了坦桑尼亚境内COVID-19疫苗接种率的决定因素,采用社会生态框架全面检查个人、人际、社区和机构的影响。背景:坦桑尼亚的八个地区,有意选择代表城市、近郊和农村环境,反映不同的社会文化和基础设施条件。方法:采用并行混合方法设计,将3098名参与者的定量调查与通过焦点小组讨论和关键信息提供者访谈收集的定性数据相结合。结果:尽管对COVID-19的总体知晓率很高(99.3%),但总体疫苗接受率仍然很低(37.2%),且存在显著的地区差异(莫罗戈罗为22.5%,姆特瓦拉为50.0%)。个人因素,如个人对疫苗的信念、感知到的安全性和错误信息,显著影响了疫苗的吸收。来自家庭、朋友和社区领导人的人际影响对疫苗接种决定起着至关重要的作用。尽管对社区领导人的作用有很高的认识(88.3%),但政府对运动的认识最低(22.4%)。制度因素,特别是卫生保健系统的信任和疫苗的可及性,也显著影响了接种。结论:研究结果主张采取针对特定区域的多层次干预措施,解决错误信息,让受信任的社区影响者参与进来,提高透明度,并加强卫生保健服务提供,以减轻差距并提高疫苗接受度。贡献:该研究为制定量身定制的公共卫生战略提供了基础见解,改善了疫苗的可及性和对坦桑尼亚和类似社会生态背景下未来流行病的抵御能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring determinants of COVID-19 vaccine uptake in Tanzania: A socio-ecological perspective.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic continues to challenge global public health, with vaccination playing a key role in mitigating transmission. Despite recognising its importance, Tanzania exhibits considerable regional disparities in vaccine uptake. Understanding the determinants influencing vaccination is essential.

Aim: This study investigated determinants of COVID-19 vaccination rates within Tanzania, employing a socio-ecological framework to comprehensively examine individual, interpersonal, community, and institutional influences.

Setting: Eight regions across Tanzania, purposively selected to represent urban, peri-urban, and rural contexts, reflecting varying socio-cultural and infrastructural conditions.

Methods: A concurrent mixed-method design was utilised, combining quantitative surveys from 3098 participants with qualitative data collected through focus group discussions and key informant interviews.

Results: Although general awareness of COVID-19 was notably high (99.3%), overall vaccine acceptance remained low (37.2%), exhibiting significant regional variations (22.5% in Morogoro to 50.0% in Mtwara). Individual factors such as personal vaccine beliefs, perceived safety, and misinformation significantly impacted uptake. Interpersonal influences from family, friends, and community leaders critically shaped vaccination decisions. Despite high acknowledgment of community leaders' roles (88.3%), governmental campaign awareness was minimal (22.4%). Institutional factors, notably healthcare system trust and vaccine accessibility, also significantly influenced uptake.

Conclusion: Findings advocate for region-specific, multilevel interventions addressing misinformation, engaging trusted community influencers, improving transparency, and enhancing healthcare service delivery to mitigate disparities and enhance vaccine acceptance.

Contribution: The study offers insights foundational for tailored public health strategies, improving vaccine accessibility and resilience against future pandemics in Tanzania and comparable socio-ecological contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health in Africa
Journal of Public Health in Africa PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health in Africa (JPHiA) is a peer-reviewed, academic journal that focuses on health issues in the African continent. The journal editors seek high quality original articles on public health related issues, reviews, comments and more. The aim of the journal is to move public health discourse from the background to the forefront. The success of Africa’s struggle against disease depends on public health approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信