Ignacio López Miñarro, Ciro García Álvarez, María Fe Muñoz Moreno, Laura Prieto Domínguez, María Antonia Saornil Álvarez
{"title":"多孔聚乙烯种植体治疗葡萄膜黑色素瘤无核患者并发症回顾性分析。","authors":"Ignacio López Miñarro, Ciro García Álvarez, María Fe Muñoz Moreno, Laura Prieto Domínguez, María Antonia Saornil Álvarez","doi":"10.1177/11206721251334701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeThis study aimed to assess the complication rate of porous polyethylene (PP) implants in patients who underwent enucleation for uveal melanoma and to explore the link between complications and surgical factors.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on consecutive cases treated at the Ocular Oncology Unit, University Clinical Hospital of Valladolid, from 1995 to 2023. Complications were classified as mild (managed conservatively) or severe (requiring implant removal or replacement). Kaplan-Meier curves analyzed complication timing.ResultsThe study included 193 patients, with an average age of 63.6 years and a mean follow-up of 65.9 months. Results showed that 54 complications (28%) were recorded, with 13 (6.7%) classified as severe, and 55.6% of complications occurred within the first three years. Implant wrapping varied: 50.3% with sclera, 11.9% with bovine pericardium, and 33.2% not wrapped. The study found no significant difference in implant survival between wrapped and unwrapped implants or between different sizes (<i>p</i> > .05).ConclusionThe findings suggest that PP implants have a low rate of severe complications in uveal melanoma patients and that complication risk is not significantly impacted by wrapping or implant size.</p>","PeriodicalId":12000,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"1786-1794"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective analysis of complications in enucleated patients with porous polyethylene implants for uveal melanoma.\",\"authors\":\"Ignacio López Miñarro, Ciro García Álvarez, María Fe Muñoz Moreno, Laura Prieto Domínguez, María Antonia Saornil Álvarez\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11206721251334701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>PurposeThis study aimed to assess the complication rate of porous polyethylene (PP) implants in patients who underwent enucleation for uveal melanoma and to explore the link between complications and surgical factors.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on consecutive cases treated at the Ocular Oncology Unit, University Clinical Hospital of Valladolid, from 1995 to 2023. Complications were classified as mild (managed conservatively) or severe (requiring implant removal or replacement). Kaplan-Meier curves analyzed complication timing.ResultsThe study included 193 patients, with an average age of 63.6 years and a mean follow-up of 65.9 months. Results showed that 54 complications (28%) were recorded, with 13 (6.7%) classified as severe, and 55.6% of complications occurred within the first three years. Implant wrapping varied: 50.3% with sclera, 11.9% with bovine pericardium, and 33.2% not wrapped. The study found no significant difference in implant survival between wrapped and unwrapped implants or between different sizes (<i>p</i> > .05).ConclusionThe findings suggest that PP implants have a low rate of severe complications in uveal melanoma patients and that complication risk is not significantly impacted by wrapping or implant size.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1786-1794\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721251334701\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721251334701","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Retrospective analysis of complications in enucleated patients with porous polyethylene implants for uveal melanoma.
PurposeThis study aimed to assess the complication rate of porous polyethylene (PP) implants in patients who underwent enucleation for uveal melanoma and to explore the link between complications and surgical factors.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on consecutive cases treated at the Ocular Oncology Unit, University Clinical Hospital of Valladolid, from 1995 to 2023. Complications were classified as mild (managed conservatively) or severe (requiring implant removal or replacement). Kaplan-Meier curves analyzed complication timing.ResultsThe study included 193 patients, with an average age of 63.6 years and a mean follow-up of 65.9 months. Results showed that 54 complications (28%) were recorded, with 13 (6.7%) classified as severe, and 55.6% of complications occurred within the first three years. Implant wrapping varied: 50.3% with sclera, 11.9% with bovine pericardium, and 33.2% not wrapped. The study found no significant difference in implant survival between wrapped and unwrapped implants or between different sizes (p > .05).ConclusionThe findings suggest that PP implants have a low rate of severe complications in uveal melanoma patients and that complication risk is not significantly impacted by wrapping or implant size.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Ophthalmology was founded in 1991 and is issued in print bi-monthly. It publishes only peer-reviewed original research reporting clinical observations and laboratory investigations with clinical relevance focusing on new diagnostic and surgical techniques, instrument and therapy updates, results of clinical trials and research findings.