Samir Mitri, Laura Martin Manfroi, Prabh R Pannu, Jessica Means, Estefania Roldan-Vasquez, Giulia Borgonovo, Tarbia Hamid, Hiral Thakkar, Roger B Davis, Ted A James
{"title":"新辅助化疗后优化三阴性乳腺癌腋窝管理。","authors":"Samir Mitri, Laura Martin Manfroi, Prabh R Pannu, Jessica Means, Estefania Roldan-Vasquez, Giulia Borgonovo, Tarbia Hamid, Hiral Thakkar, Roger B Davis, Ted A James","doi":"10.1016/j.clbc.2025.03.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) often shows significant response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), creating opportunities for axillary de-escalation. This study investigates axillary de-escalation and the factors influencing its use in TNBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with cT1-cT2, cN1 TNBC treated between 2012 and 2020 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Nodal response rates, including achievement of ypN0, were analyzed. Logistic regression identified clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with axillary management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 12,742 patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), 31.7% achieved nodal pathologic complete response (pCR). These patients were more also likely to achieve breast tumor pCR. Treatment across multiple facilities was associated with a higher likelihood of attempted axillary de-escalation. ALND rates steadily declined between 2014 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite achieving nodal pCR after NACT, many patients with TNBC underwent ALND. These findings underscore the need to refine criteria and increase adoption of axillary de-escalation strategies in TNBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":10197,"journal":{"name":"Clinical breast cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Axillary Management in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Samir Mitri, Laura Martin Manfroi, Prabh R Pannu, Jessica Means, Estefania Roldan-Vasquez, Giulia Borgonovo, Tarbia Hamid, Hiral Thakkar, Roger B Davis, Ted A James\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clbc.2025.03.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) often shows significant response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), creating opportunities for axillary de-escalation. This study investigates axillary de-escalation and the factors influencing its use in TNBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with cT1-cT2, cN1 TNBC treated between 2012 and 2020 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Nodal response rates, including achievement of ypN0, were analyzed. Logistic regression identified clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with axillary management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 12,742 patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), 31.7% achieved nodal pathologic complete response (pCR). These patients were more also likely to achieve breast tumor pCR. Treatment across multiple facilities was associated with a higher likelihood of attempted axillary de-escalation. ALND rates steadily declined between 2014 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite achieving nodal pCR after NACT, many patients with TNBC underwent ALND. These findings underscore the need to refine criteria and increase adoption of axillary de-escalation strategies in TNBC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical breast cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical breast cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2025.03.020\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2025.03.020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimizing Axillary Management in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
Introduction: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) often shows significant response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), creating opportunities for axillary de-escalation. This study investigates axillary de-escalation and the factors influencing its use in TNBC.
Methods: Patients with cT1-cT2, cN1 TNBC treated between 2012 and 2020 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Nodal response rates, including achievement of ypN0, were analyzed. Logistic regression identified clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with axillary management.
Results: Among 12,742 patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), 31.7% achieved nodal pathologic complete response (pCR). These patients were more also likely to achieve breast tumor pCR. Treatment across multiple facilities was associated with a higher likelihood of attempted axillary de-escalation. ALND rates steadily declined between 2014 and 2020.
Conclusion: Despite achieving nodal pCR after NACT, many patients with TNBC underwent ALND. These findings underscore the need to refine criteria and increase adoption of axillary de-escalation strategies in TNBC.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Breast Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of breast cancer. Clinical Breast Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to breast cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research reports from various therapeutic modalities, cancer genetics, drug sensitivity and resistance, novel imaging, tumor genomics, biomarkers, and chemoprevention strategies.