{"title":"一步一步:行走对结肠镜检查结果影响的荟萃分析和系统综述。","authors":"Islam Mohamed, Hazem Abosheaishaa, Sarah George, Khushi Parekh, Nina Henry, Suman Manek, Lauren Baetje, Mira Bhatia, Fouad Jaber, Syed Hammad Rahman, Maya Mahmoud, Yazan Abboud, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Nikki Duong, Yusuke Hashimoto","doi":"10.1159/000545844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Colorectal cancer screening relies on effective bowel preparation before a colonoscopy. Walking has emerged as a potential adjunct strategy to achieve bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy. We investigated the efficacy of walking as a potential adjunct strategy to bowel preparation methods. Methods Our search encompassed Embase, Medline, Cochrane, and Scopus databases. Search results underwent screening utilizing Covidence based on predefined criteria. Data extraction performed by independent reviewers involved general characteristics, baseline patient characteristics, and outcome measures. Risk of Bias evaluation employed the RoB 2 tool for RCTs. Statistical analysis utilized RevMan v5.3, employing mean differences and random-effects models. Statistical significance was indicated by p-value < 0.05. Heterogeneity was assessed with I-square tests. Results Our meta-analysis included four RCTs with a total of 1218 patients. We found that walking did not yield a significant difference in total BPPS score compared to control groups. Walking led to statistically significant improvements in ascending, transverse, and descending colon BPPS scores. Walking did not significantly affect cecal intubation time or total procedure time. While there was no significant difference in the time to first diarrhea, the total number of diarrheal episodes was significantly impacted. Conclusion While walking did not significantly affect total BPPS scores, procedural timelines, or cecal intubation, it demonstrated significant improvements in ascending, transverse, and descending colon BPPS scores and diarrheal instances. These findings suggest that walking may have a beneficial effect on specific aspects of bowel preparation for colonoscopy, highlighting its potential as an adjunctive strategy in enhancing colonoscopy outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11294,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Step by Step: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review on the Impact of Walking on Colonoscopy Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Islam Mohamed, Hazem Abosheaishaa, Sarah George, Khushi Parekh, Nina Henry, Suman Manek, Lauren Baetje, Mira Bhatia, Fouad Jaber, Syed Hammad Rahman, Maya Mahmoud, Yazan Abboud, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Nikki Duong, Yusuke Hashimoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000545844\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Introduction Colorectal cancer screening relies on effective bowel preparation before a colonoscopy. Walking has emerged as a potential adjunct strategy to achieve bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy. We investigated the efficacy of walking as a potential adjunct strategy to bowel preparation methods. Methods Our search encompassed Embase, Medline, Cochrane, and Scopus databases. Search results underwent screening utilizing Covidence based on predefined criteria. Data extraction performed by independent reviewers involved general characteristics, baseline patient characteristics, and outcome measures. Risk of Bias evaluation employed the RoB 2 tool for RCTs. Statistical analysis utilized RevMan v5.3, employing mean differences and random-effects models. Statistical significance was indicated by p-value < 0.05. Heterogeneity was assessed with I-square tests. Results Our meta-analysis included four RCTs with a total of 1218 patients. We found that walking did not yield a significant difference in total BPPS score compared to control groups. Walking led to statistically significant improvements in ascending, transverse, and descending colon BPPS scores. Walking did not significantly affect cecal intubation time or total procedure time. While there was no significant difference in the time to first diarrhea, the total number of diarrheal episodes was significantly impacted. Conclusion While walking did not significantly affect total BPPS scores, procedural timelines, or cecal intubation, it demonstrated significant improvements in ascending, transverse, and descending colon BPPS scores and diarrheal instances. These findings suggest that walking may have a beneficial effect on specific aspects of bowel preparation for colonoscopy, highlighting its potential as an adjunctive strategy in enhancing colonoscopy outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545844\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545844","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Step by Step: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review on the Impact of Walking on Colonoscopy Outcomes.
Introduction Colorectal cancer screening relies on effective bowel preparation before a colonoscopy. Walking has emerged as a potential adjunct strategy to achieve bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy. We investigated the efficacy of walking as a potential adjunct strategy to bowel preparation methods. Methods Our search encompassed Embase, Medline, Cochrane, and Scopus databases. Search results underwent screening utilizing Covidence based on predefined criteria. Data extraction performed by independent reviewers involved general characteristics, baseline patient characteristics, and outcome measures. Risk of Bias evaluation employed the RoB 2 tool for RCTs. Statistical analysis utilized RevMan v5.3, employing mean differences and random-effects models. Statistical significance was indicated by p-value < 0.05. Heterogeneity was assessed with I-square tests. Results Our meta-analysis included four RCTs with a total of 1218 patients. We found that walking did not yield a significant difference in total BPPS score compared to control groups. Walking led to statistically significant improvements in ascending, transverse, and descending colon BPPS scores. Walking did not significantly affect cecal intubation time or total procedure time. While there was no significant difference in the time to first diarrhea, the total number of diarrheal episodes was significantly impacted. Conclusion While walking did not significantly affect total BPPS scores, procedural timelines, or cecal intubation, it demonstrated significant improvements in ascending, transverse, and descending colon BPPS scores and diarrheal instances. These findings suggest that walking may have a beneficial effect on specific aspects of bowel preparation for colonoscopy, highlighting its potential as an adjunctive strategy in enhancing colonoscopy outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Each issue of this journal is dedicated to a special topic of current interest, covering both clinical and basic science topics in gastrointestinal function and disorders. The contents of each issue are comprehensive and reflect the state of the art, featuring editorials, reviews, mini reviews and original papers. These individual contributions encompass a variety of disciplines including all fields of gastroenterology. ''Digestive Diseases'' bridges the communication gap between advances made in the academic setting and their application in patient care. The journal is a valuable service for clinicians, specialists and physicians-in-training.