一步一步:行走对结肠镜检查结果影响的荟萃分析和系统综述。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Islam Mohamed, Hazem Abosheaishaa, Sarah George, Khushi Parekh, Nina Henry, Suman Manek, Lauren Baetje, Mira Bhatia, Fouad Jaber, Syed Hammad Rahman, Maya Mahmoud, Yazan Abboud, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Nikki Duong, Yusuke Hashimoto
{"title":"一步一步:行走对结肠镜检查结果影响的荟萃分析和系统综述。","authors":"Islam Mohamed, Hazem Abosheaishaa, Sarah George, Khushi Parekh, Nina Henry, Suman Manek, Lauren Baetje, Mira Bhatia, Fouad Jaber, Syed Hammad Rahman, Maya Mahmoud, Yazan Abboud, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Nikki Duong, Yusuke Hashimoto","doi":"10.1159/000545844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Colorectal cancer screening relies on effective bowel preparation before a colonoscopy. Walking has emerged as a potential adjunct strategy to achieve bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy. We investigated the efficacy of walking as a potential adjunct strategy to bowel preparation methods. Methods Our search encompassed Embase, Medline, Cochrane, and Scopus databases. Search results underwent screening utilizing Covidence based on predefined criteria. Data extraction performed by independent reviewers involved general characteristics, baseline patient characteristics, and outcome measures. Risk of Bias evaluation employed the RoB 2 tool for RCTs. Statistical analysis utilized RevMan v5.3, employing mean differences and random-effects models. Statistical significance was indicated by p-value < 0.05. Heterogeneity was assessed with I-square tests. Results Our meta-analysis included four RCTs with a total of 1218 patients. We found that walking did not yield a significant difference in total BPPS score compared to control groups. Walking led to statistically significant improvements in ascending, transverse, and descending colon BPPS scores. Walking did not significantly affect cecal intubation time or total procedure time. While there was no significant difference in the time to first diarrhea, the total number of diarrheal episodes was significantly impacted. Conclusion While walking did not significantly affect total BPPS scores, procedural timelines, or cecal intubation, it demonstrated significant improvements in ascending, transverse, and descending colon BPPS scores and diarrheal instances. These findings suggest that walking may have a beneficial effect on specific aspects of bowel preparation for colonoscopy, highlighting its potential as an adjunctive strategy in enhancing colonoscopy outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11294,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Step by Step: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review on the Impact of Walking on Colonoscopy Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Islam Mohamed, Hazem Abosheaishaa, Sarah George, Khushi Parekh, Nina Henry, Suman Manek, Lauren Baetje, Mira Bhatia, Fouad Jaber, Syed Hammad Rahman, Maya Mahmoud, Yazan Abboud, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Nikki Duong, Yusuke Hashimoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000545844\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Introduction Colorectal cancer screening relies on effective bowel preparation before a colonoscopy. Walking has emerged as a potential adjunct strategy to achieve bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy. We investigated the efficacy of walking as a potential adjunct strategy to bowel preparation methods. Methods Our search encompassed Embase, Medline, Cochrane, and Scopus databases. Search results underwent screening utilizing Covidence based on predefined criteria. Data extraction performed by independent reviewers involved general characteristics, baseline patient characteristics, and outcome measures. Risk of Bias evaluation employed the RoB 2 tool for RCTs. Statistical analysis utilized RevMan v5.3, employing mean differences and random-effects models. Statistical significance was indicated by p-value < 0.05. Heterogeneity was assessed with I-square tests. Results Our meta-analysis included four RCTs with a total of 1218 patients. We found that walking did not yield a significant difference in total BPPS score compared to control groups. Walking led to statistically significant improvements in ascending, transverse, and descending colon BPPS scores. Walking did not significantly affect cecal intubation time or total procedure time. While there was no significant difference in the time to first diarrhea, the total number of diarrheal episodes was significantly impacted. Conclusion While walking did not significantly affect total BPPS scores, procedural timelines, or cecal intubation, it demonstrated significant improvements in ascending, transverse, and descending colon BPPS scores and diarrheal instances. These findings suggest that walking may have a beneficial effect on specific aspects of bowel preparation for colonoscopy, highlighting its potential as an adjunctive strategy in enhancing colonoscopy outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545844\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545844","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

结直肠癌筛查依赖于结肠镜检查前有效的肠道准备。行走已成为结肠镜检查前实现肠道清洁的潜在辅助策略。我们调查了步行作为肠道准备方法的潜在辅助策略的有效性。方法检索Embase、Medline、Cochrane和Scopus数据库。根据预定义的标准,利用covid对搜索结果进行筛选。数据提取由独立评论者进行,包括一般特征、基线患者特征和结果测量。偏倚风险评价采用随机对照试验的RoB 2工具。统计分析采用RevMan v5.3,采用均值差异和随机效应模型。p值< 0.05表示差异有统计学意义。异质性评价采用i方检验。我们的荟萃分析包括4项随机对照试验,共1218例患者。我们发现,与对照组相比,步行组在BPPS总分上没有显著差异。步行可显著改善升结肠、横结肠和降结肠BPPS评分。步行对盲肠插管时间或总手术时间无显著影响。虽然在首次腹泻的时间上没有显著差异,但总腹泻次数明显受到影响。结论步行对BPPS总评分、手术时间线或盲肠插管没有显著影响,但对升、横、降结肠BPPS评分和腹泻情况有显著改善。这些发现表明,步行可能对结肠镜检查前肠道准备的特定方面有有益的影响,突出了其作为增强结肠镜检查结果的辅助策略的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Step by Step: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review on the Impact of Walking on Colonoscopy Outcomes.

Introduction Colorectal cancer screening relies on effective bowel preparation before a colonoscopy. Walking has emerged as a potential adjunct strategy to achieve bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy. We investigated the efficacy of walking as a potential adjunct strategy to bowel preparation methods. Methods Our search encompassed Embase, Medline, Cochrane, and Scopus databases. Search results underwent screening utilizing Covidence based on predefined criteria. Data extraction performed by independent reviewers involved general characteristics, baseline patient characteristics, and outcome measures. Risk of Bias evaluation employed the RoB 2 tool for RCTs. Statistical analysis utilized RevMan v5.3, employing mean differences and random-effects models. Statistical significance was indicated by p-value < 0.05. Heterogeneity was assessed with I-square tests. Results Our meta-analysis included four RCTs with a total of 1218 patients. We found that walking did not yield a significant difference in total BPPS score compared to control groups. Walking led to statistically significant improvements in ascending, transverse, and descending colon BPPS scores. Walking did not significantly affect cecal intubation time or total procedure time. While there was no significant difference in the time to first diarrhea, the total number of diarrheal episodes was significantly impacted. Conclusion While walking did not significantly affect total BPPS scores, procedural timelines, or cecal intubation, it demonstrated significant improvements in ascending, transverse, and descending colon BPPS scores and diarrheal instances. These findings suggest that walking may have a beneficial effect on specific aspects of bowel preparation for colonoscopy, highlighting its potential as an adjunctive strategy in enhancing colonoscopy outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases
Digestive Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Each issue of this journal is dedicated to a special topic of current interest, covering both clinical and basic science topics in gastrointestinal function and disorders. The contents of each issue are comprehensive and reflect the state of the art, featuring editorials, reviews, mini reviews and original papers. These individual contributions encompass a variety of disciplines including all fields of gastroenterology. ''Digestive Diseases'' bridges the communication gap between advances made in the academic setting and their application in patient care. The journal is a valuable service for clinicians, specialists and physicians-in-training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信