过程绘图作为识别皮肤病学过程中废物的关键工具,以提高成本效益和可持续性:介入性案例研究。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Kevin Yang, Goranit Sakunchotpanit, F Clarissa Yang, Bichchau Nguyen
{"title":"过程绘图作为识别皮肤病学过程中废物的关键工具,以提高成本效益和可持续性:介入性案例研究。","authors":"Kevin Yang, Goranit Sakunchotpanit, F Clarissa Yang, Bichchau Nguyen","doi":"10.1097/DSS.0000000000004682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dermatologic procedures use many consumable items, resulting in significant financial and environmental costs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To demonstrate process mapping's utility in identifying and reducing consumable waste generated during dermatologic excisions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Process mapping was used to identify and quantify consumable wastes generated by 20 excisions at a dermatologic surgery clinic. The results were discussed among researchers, clinical support staff, and clinicians to develop waste mitigation interventions. 20 additional excisions were mapped after implementation of these interventions to quantify reduction of consumable waste and associated financial savings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preintervention, the average total cost of consumables per excision was $48.02. The average cost of wasted consumables was $21.69 (45%). Process mapping identified unused items, such as cotton-tipped applicators, and partially used items, including iodine, lidocaine, and gauze. Interdisciplinary discussion of results revealed limitations to waste mitigation such as standard packaging sizes, existing supply chains, hospital and state policies, and workflow efficiency tradeoffs. Waste mitigation strategies included removal of unused products (e.g., cotton-tipped applicators and extra blades), alternative formulations (e.g., betadine swab vs bottles), and smaller packaging sizes. Postintervention, the waste cost per case decreased by 16.9% to $18.01.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Process mapping is an effective tool to identify consumable waste in dermatologic surgeries and results in significant cost savings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11289,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Process Mapping as a Key Tool in Identifying Waste in Dermatologic Procedures to Improve Cost-Effectiveness and Sustainability: An Interventional Case Study.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Yang, Goranit Sakunchotpanit, F Clarissa Yang, Bichchau Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/DSS.0000000000004682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dermatologic procedures use many consumable items, resulting in significant financial and environmental costs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To demonstrate process mapping's utility in identifying and reducing consumable waste generated during dermatologic excisions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Process mapping was used to identify and quantify consumable wastes generated by 20 excisions at a dermatologic surgery clinic. The results were discussed among researchers, clinical support staff, and clinicians to develop waste mitigation interventions. 20 additional excisions were mapped after implementation of these interventions to quantify reduction of consumable waste and associated financial savings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preintervention, the average total cost of consumables per excision was $48.02. The average cost of wasted consumables was $21.69 (45%). Process mapping identified unused items, such as cotton-tipped applicators, and partially used items, including iodine, lidocaine, and gauze. Interdisciplinary discussion of results revealed limitations to waste mitigation such as standard packaging sizes, existing supply chains, hospital and state policies, and workflow efficiency tradeoffs. Waste mitigation strategies included removal of unused products (e.g., cotton-tipped applicators and extra blades), alternative formulations (e.g., betadine swab vs bottles), and smaller packaging sizes. Postintervention, the waste cost per case decreased by 16.9% to $18.01.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Process mapping is an effective tool to identify consumable waste in dermatologic surgeries and results in significant cost savings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatologic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatologic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000004682\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000004682","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:皮肤科手术使用许多消耗品,导致重大的财政和环境成本。目的:探讨过程图在识别和减少皮肤切除过程中产生的消耗性废物中的应用。材料和方法:采用过程图法对某皮肤科外科诊所20例手术产生的消耗性废物进行识别和量化。研究人员、临床支助人员和临床医生讨论了这些结果,以制定减少废物的干预措施。在实施这些干预措施后,绘制了20个额外的切除图,以量化减少消耗品浪费和相关的财务节省。结果:干预前,平均每次手术耗材总成本为48.02美元。浪费消耗品的平均成本为21.69美元(45%)。工艺图确定了未使用的物品,如棉签涂抹器和部分使用的物品,包括碘、利多卡因和纱布。对结果的跨学科讨论揭示了减少浪费的局限性,如标准包装尺寸、现有供应链、医院和国家政策以及工作流程效率权衡。减少废物的战略包括去除未使用的产品(例如,棉头涂抹器和额外的刀片)、替代配方(例如,比他定棉签与瓶子)和更小的包装尺寸。干预后,每宗个案的废物成本下降16.9%至18.01元。结论:流程图是识别皮肤外科手术中耗材浪费的有效工具,可显著节省成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Process Mapping as a Key Tool in Identifying Waste in Dermatologic Procedures to Improve Cost-Effectiveness and Sustainability: An Interventional Case Study.

Background: Dermatologic procedures use many consumable items, resulting in significant financial and environmental costs.

Objective: To demonstrate process mapping's utility in identifying and reducing consumable waste generated during dermatologic excisions.

Materials and methods: Process mapping was used to identify and quantify consumable wastes generated by 20 excisions at a dermatologic surgery clinic. The results were discussed among researchers, clinical support staff, and clinicians to develop waste mitigation interventions. 20 additional excisions were mapped after implementation of these interventions to quantify reduction of consumable waste and associated financial savings.

Results: Preintervention, the average total cost of consumables per excision was $48.02. The average cost of wasted consumables was $21.69 (45%). Process mapping identified unused items, such as cotton-tipped applicators, and partially used items, including iodine, lidocaine, and gauze. Interdisciplinary discussion of results revealed limitations to waste mitigation such as standard packaging sizes, existing supply chains, hospital and state policies, and workflow efficiency tradeoffs. Waste mitigation strategies included removal of unused products (e.g., cotton-tipped applicators and extra blades), alternative formulations (e.g., betadine swab vs bottles), and smaller packaging sizes. Postintervention, the waste cost per case decreased by 16.9% to $18.01.

Conclusion: Process mapping is an effective tool to identify consumable waste in dermatologic surgeries and results in significant cost savings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dermatologic Surgery
Dermatologic Surgery 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
547
期刊介绍: Exclusively devoted to dermatologic surgery, the Dermatologic Surgery journal publishes the most clinically comprehensive and up-to-date information in its field. This unique monthly journal provides today’s most expansive and in-depth coverage of cosmetic and reconstructive skin surgery and skin cancer through peer-reviewed original articles, extensive illustrations, case reports, ongoing features, literature reviews and correspondence. The journal provides information on the latest scientific information for all types of dermatologic surgery including: -Ambulatory phlebectomy- Blepharoplasty- Body contouring- Chemical peels- Cryosurgery- Curettage and desiccation- Dermabrasion- Excision and closure- Flap Surgery- Grafting- Hair restoration surgery- Injectable neuromodulators- Laser surgery- Liposuction- Microdermabrasion- Microlipoinjection- Micropigmentation- Mohs micrographic surgery- Nail surgery- Phlebology- Sclerotherapy- Skin cancer surgery- Skin resurfacing- Soft-tissue fillers. Dermatologists, dermatologic surgeons, plastic surgeons, oculoplastic surgeons and facial plastic surgeons consider this a must-read publication for anyone in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信