{"title":"用流动电位法测定离子和非离子表面活性剂的临界胶束浓度。","authors":"Yuri Chenyakin, David Da Yong Chen","doi":"10.1002/elps.8145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A capillary electrophoresis system capable of measuring streaming potentials was used for the determination of critical micelle concentration (CMC) of anionic, cationic, zwitterionic and non-ionic surfactants. The CMC values of anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), cationic surfactant cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), zwitterionic surfactant 3-((3-cholamidopropyl) dimethylammonio)-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS) and non-ionic surfactant polyethylene glycol p-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)-phenyl ether (Triton X-100) in water or salt solutions were determined by determining the abrupt change in the trend of streaming potential change with the surfactant concentration. The CMC values were 8.23, 0.93, 5.80 and 0.16 mM, respectively. This method was also used to demonstrate how the CMCs of SDS and CTAB change differently with temperature. The CMC of SDS decreased from 10°C to 25°C and then increased from 25°C to 40°C, whereas CTAB only increased linearly within 10°C-40°C. The capillary wall zeta potentials in surfactant solutions can be calculated from the measured streaming potential, conductivity and solution viscosity. Surface charge densities were calculated using the zeta potentials obtained. The surface charge densities of SDS were calculated to be 5.6-0.8 C/m<sup>2</sup> when SDS solutions with concentrations of 2-20 mM zeta potentials were used. The calculated zeta potentials and surface charge densities reached a plateau at about 8 mM, which coincided with the CMC of SDS determined in the present study and the literature values. The CMC values obtained from streaming potential measurement are comparable to values obtained with other CMC determination techniques such as surface tension and conductometric measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":11596,"journal":{"name":"ELECTROPHORESIS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of Critical Micelle Concentration of Ionic and Non-Ionic Surfactants by Streaming Potential Measurements.\",\"authors\":\"Yuri Chenyakin, David Da Yong Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/elps.8145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A capillary electrophoresis system capable of measuring streaming potentials was used for the determination of critical micelle concentration (CMC) of anionic, cationic, zwitterionic and non-ionic surfactants. The CMC values of anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), cationic surfactant cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), zwitterionic surfactant 3-((3-cholamidopropyl) dimethylammonio)-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS) and non-ionic surfactant polyethylene glycol p-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)-phenyl ether (Triton X-100) in water or salt solutions were determined by determining the abrupt change in the trend of streaming potential change with the surfactant concentration. The CMC values were 8.23, 0.93, 5.80 and 0.16 mM, respectively. This method was also used to demonstrate how the CMCs of SDS and CTAB change differently with temperature. The CMC of SDS decreased from 10°C to 25°C and then increased from 25°C to 40°C, whereas CTAB only increased linearly within 10°C-40°C. The capillary wall zeta potentials in surfactant solutions can be calculated from the measured streaming potential, conductivity and solution viscosity. Surface charge densities were calculated using the zeta potentials obtained. The surface charge densities of SDS were calculated to be 5.6-0.8 C/m<sup>2</sup> when SDS solutions with concentrations of 2-20 mM zeta potentials were used. The calculated zeta potentials and surface charge densities reached a plateau at about 8 mM, which coincided with the CMC of SDS determined in the present study and the literature values. The CMC values obtained from streaming potential measurement are comparable to values obtained with other CMC determination techniques such as surface tension and conductometric measurements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ELECTROPHORESIS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ELECTROPHORESIS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.8145\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELECTROPHORESIS","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.8145","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Determination of Critical Micelle Concentration of Ionic and Non-Ionic Surfactants by Streaming Potential Measurements.
A capillary electrophoresis system capable of measuring streaming potentials was used for the determination of critical micelle concentration (CMC) of anionic, cationic, zwitterionic and non-ionic surfactants. The CMC values of anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), cationic surfactant cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), zwitterionic surfactant 3-((3-cholamidopropyl) dimethylammonio)-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS) and non-ionic surfactant polyethylene glycol p-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)-phenyl ether (Triton X-100) in water or salt solutions were determined by determining the abrupt change in the trend of streaming potential change with the surfactant concentration. The CMC values were 8.23, 0.93, 5.80 and 0.16 mM, respectively. This method was also used to demonstrate how the CMCs of SDS and CTAB change differently with temperature. The CMC of SDS decreased from 10°C to 25°C and then increased from 25°C to 40°C, whereas CTAB only increased linearly within 10°C-40°C. The capillary wall zeta potentials in surfactant solutions can be calculated from the measured streaming potential, conductivity and solution viscosity. Surface charge densities were calculated using the zeta potentials obtained. The surface charge densities of SDS were calculated to be 5.6-0.8 C/m2 when SDS solutions with concentrations of 2-20 mM zeta potentials were used. The calculated zeta potentials and surface charge densities reached a plateau at about 8 mM, which coincided with the CMC of SDS determined in the present study and the literature values. The CMC values obtained from streaming potential measurement are comparable to values obtained with other CMC determination techniques such as surface tension and conductometric measurements.
期刊介绍:
ELECTROPHORESIS is an international journal that publishes original manuscripts on all aspects of electrophoresis, and liquid phase separations (e.g., HPLC, micro- and nano-LC, UHPLC, micro- and nano-fluidics, liquid-phase micro-extractions, etc.).
Topics include new or improved analytical and preparative methods, sample preparation, development of theory, and innovative applications of electrophoretic and liquid phase separations methods in the study of nucleic acids, proteins, carbohydrates natural products, pharmaceuticals, food analysis, environmental species and other compounds of importance to the life sciences.
Papers in the areas of microfluidics and proteomics, which are not limited to electrophoresis-based methods, will also be accepted for publication. Contributions focused on hyphenated and omics techniques are also of interest. Proteomics is within the scope, if related to its fundamentals and new technical approaches. Proteomics applications are only considered in particular cases.
Papers describing the application of standard electrophoretic methods will not be considered.
Papers on nanoanalysis intended for publication in ELECTROPHORESIS should focus on one or more of the following topics:
• Nanoscale electrokinetics and phenomena related to electric double layer and/or confinement in nano-sized geometry
• Single cell and subcellular analysis
• Nanosensors and ultrasensitive detection aspects (e.g., involving quantum dots, "nanoelectrodes" or nanospray MS)
• Nanoscale/nanopore DNA sequencing (next generation sequencing)
• Micro- and nanoscale sample preparation
• Nanoparticles and cells analyses by dielectrophoresis
• Separation-based analysis using nanoparticles, nanotubes and nanowires.