Alison E. Lim, Andrew Williamson, Freddie Green, Ying Ki Lee, Lucy Li, Christy Moen, Rishi Vasanthan, Olivia Wharf, Jeremy Wong, Vinidh Paleri, INTEGRATE (The UK ENT Trainee Research Network)
{"title":"影响英国国家头颈癌目标依从性的临床因素:来自一项国家队列研究的结果","authors":"Alison E. Lim, Andrew Williamson, Freddie Green, Ying Ki Lee, Lucy Li, Christy Moen, Rishi Vasanthan, Olivia Wharf, Jeremy Wong, Vinidh Paleri, INTEGRATE (The UK ENT Trainee Research Network)","doi":"10.1111/coa.14314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>In the United Kingdom, it is the standard of care that treatment decisions in all new cases of head and neck cancer (HNC) are discussed at a multidisciplinary team meeting (MDT). The aim of this project was to gain a national perspective on the scope of current HNC treatment, compliance with national cancer pathway targets, and their influence on survival outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A multicentre, retrospective, national observational study of primary HNC patients was discussed at a specialist MDT between September and November 2021.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Data on 1488 patients were included from 50 UK departments. The most common subsite was oropharynx (35.4%, 522), of which 61.7% (263) were HPV positive. Median time of referral to diagnosis, MDT decision to treatment, and referral to first definitive treatment in primary HNCs managed curatively were 37 (interquartile range [IQR] 22–57), 42 (IQR 29–65), and 74 (IQR 54–101) days, respectively. Compliance with the 28-day, 31-day, and 62-day targets were met in 32.8% (488), 33.3% (495), and 34.6% (515), respectively. On multivariate analysis, patients with urgent cancer referrals, T1–T2 stage disease, and not undergoing a general anaesthetic biopsy were associated with greater compliance with national pathway targets.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study highlights the majority of UK HNC patients are not meeting national pathway targets and delays are seen at all points in the HNC journey. Improving adherence with national best practice standards will contribute to reducing time to treatment for HNC.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10431,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Otolaryngology","volume":"50 4","pages":"739-750"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Factors Influencing the Compliance With National Head and Neck Cancer Targets in the United Kingdom: Results From a National Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"Alison E. Lim, Andrew Williamson, Freddie Green, Ying Ki Lee, Lucy Li, Christy Moen, Rishi Vasanthan, Olivia Wharf, Jeremy Wong, Vinidh Paleri, INTEGRATE (The UK ENT Trainee Research Network)\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/coa.14314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>In the United Kingdom, it is the standard of care that treatment decisions in all new cases of head and neck cancer (HNC) are discussed at a multidisciplinary team meeting (MDT). The aim of this project was to gain a national perspective on the scope of current HNC treatment, compliance with national cancer pathway targets, and their influence on survival outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A multicentre, retrospective, national observational study of primary HNC patients was discussed at a specialist MDT between September and November 2021.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data on 1488 patients were included from 50 UK departments. The most common subsite was oropharynx (35.4%, 522), of which 61.7% (263) were HPV positive. Median time of referral to diagnosis, MDT decision to treatment, and referral to first definitive treatment in primary HNCs managed curatively were 37 (interquartile range [IQR] 22–57), 42 (IQR 29–65), and 74 (IQR 54–101) days, respectively. Compliance with the 28-day, 31-day, and 62-day targets were met in 32.8% (488), 33.3% (495), and 34.6% (515), respectively. On multivariate analysis, patients with urgent cancer referrals, T1–T2 stage disease, and not undergoing a general anaesthetic biopsy were associated with greater compliance with national pathway targets.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study highlights the majority of UK HNC patients are not meeting national pathway targets and delays are seen at all points in the HNC journey. Improving adherence with national best practice standards will contribute to reducing time to treatment for HNC.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"50 4\",\"pages\":\"739-750\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/coa.14314\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/coa.14314","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical Factors Influencing the Compliance With National Head and Neck Cancer Targets in the United Kingdom: Results From a National Cohort Study
Introduction
In the United Kingdom, it is the standard of care that treatment decisions in all new cases of head and neck cancer (HNC) are discussed at a multidisciplinary team meeting (MDT). The aim of this project was to gain a national perspective on the scope of current HNC treatment, compliance with national cancer pathway targets, and their influence on survival outcomes.
Methods
A multicentre, retrospective, national observational study of primary HNC patients was discussed at a specialist MDT between September and November 2021.
Results
Data on 1488 patients were included from 50 UK departments. The most common subsite was oropharynx (35.4%, 522), of which 61.7% (263) were HPV positive. Median time of referral to diagnosis, MDT decision to treatment, and referral to first definitive treatment in primary HNCs managed curatively were 37 (interquartile range [IQR] 22–57), 42 (IQR 29–65), and 74 (IQR 54–101) days, respectively. Compliance with the 28-day, 31-day, and 62-day targets were met in 32.8% (488), 33.3% (495), and 34.6% (515), respectively. On multivariate analysis, patients with urgent cancer referrals, T1–T2 stage disease, and not undergoing a general anaesthetic biopsy were associated with greater compliance with national pathway targets.
Conclusion
This study highlights the majority of UK HNC patients are not meeting national pathway targets and delays are seen at all points in the HNC journey. Improving adherence with national best practice standards will contribute to reducing time to treatment for HNC.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Otolaryngology is a bimonthly journal devoted to clinically-oriented research papers of the highest scientific standards dealing with:
current otorhinolaryngological practice
audiology, otology, balance, rhinology, larynx, voice and paediatric ORL
head and neck oncology
head and neck plastic and reconstructive surgery
continuing medical education and ORL training
The emphasis is on high quality new work in the clinical field and on fresh, original research.
Each issue begins with an editorial expressing the personal opinions of an individual with a particular knowledge of a chosen subject. The main body of each issue is then devoted to original papers carrying important results for those working in the field. In addition, topical review articles are published discussing a particular subject in depth, including not only the opinions of the author but also any controversies surrounding the subject.
• Negative/null results
In order for research to advance, negative results, which often make a valuable contribution to the field, should be published. However, articles containing negative or null results are frequently not considered for publication or rejected by journals. We welcome papers of this kind, where appropriate and valid power calculations are included that give confidence that a negative result can be relied upon.