Maya Chopra, Ji-Cheng Hsieh, William Mueller, Eric D Braunstein, Stuart Beldner, Raman L Mitra, Laurence M Epstein, Jonathan Willner, James K Gabriels
{"title":"起搏诱发心肌病的发生率:左束支区起搏与无导联起搏。","authors":"Maya Chopra, Ji-Cheng Hsieh, William Mueller, Eric D Braunstein, Stuart Beldner, Raman L Mitra, Laurence M Epstein, Jonathan Willner, James K Gabriels","doi":"10.1007/s10840-025-02048-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with chronic right ventricular (RV) pacing are at risk for developing pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM). Data regarding the incidence of PICM when pacing the RV septum using a leadless pacemaker (LP) are limited. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has emerged as a viable alternative to RV pacing with a low incidence of PICM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who received either a LP capable of providing atrioventricular (AV) synchronous pacing or a permanent pacemaker (PPM) with a LBBAP lead (lumenless or stylet-driven leads) for AV block between January 2021 and January 2023 at a single center were screened. Patients were included in the final analysis if they had both a pre- and post-operative transthoracic echocardiogram, pre- and post-operative electrocardiograms, and a pacing burden of ≥ 20%. The incidence of PICM, defined as a decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by ≥ 20% and to a value < 50% after a follow-up of at least six months, was compared between LBBAP and LP groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the study period, 533 PPMs were implanted for AV block. Of these, 95 patients met the inclusion criteria; 70 underwent LBBAP and 25 received LPs. The average age of the population was 75 ± 13 years; 64 (63%) were men. There was no difference in the mean pre-operative LVEF (57% ± 16% vs. 61% ± 10%; p = 0.25) or QRS duration (123 ± 33ms vs. 130 ± 29ms) between the LBBAP and LP groups. There was a high burden of ventricular pacing in both groups (90% ± 19% vs. 92% ± 13%; p = 0.52). After a follow-up of 14 ± 8 months, the incidence of PICM was significantly lower in the LBBAP group compared to the LP group (4.3% vs. 24%; p = 0.0039).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients who are not candidates for cardiac resynchronization, who require a high burden of ventricular pacing, LBBAP may lead to a lower incidence of PICM than right ventricular septal pacing with a LP.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: left bundle branch area pacing versus leadless pacing.\",\"authors\":\"Maya Chopra, Ji-Cheng Hsieh, William Mueller, Eric D Braunstein, Stuart Beldner, Raman L Mitra, Laurence M Epstein, Jonathan Willner, James K Gabriels\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10840-025-02048-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with chronic right ventricular (RV) pacing are at risk for developing pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM). Data regarding the incidence of PICM when pacing the RV septum using a leadless pacemaker (LP) are limited. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has emerged as a viable alternative to RV pacing with a low incidence of PICM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who received either a LP capable of providing atrioventricular (AV) synchronous pacing or a permanent pacemaker (PPM) with a LBBAP lead (lumenless or stylet-driven leads) for AV block between January 2021 and January 2023 at a single center were screened. Patients were included in the final analysis if they had both a pre- and post-operative transthoracic echocardiogram, pre- and post-operative electrocardiograms, and a pacing burden of ≥ 20%. The incidence of PICM, defined as a decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by ≥ 20% and to a value < 50% after a follow-up of at least six months, was compared between LBBAP and LP groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the study period, 533 PPMs were implanted for AV block. Of these, 95 patients met the inclusion criteria; 70 underwent LBBAP and 25 received LPs. The average age of the population was 75 ± 13 years; 64 (63%) were men. There was no difference in the mean pre-operative LVEF (57% ± 16% vs. 61% ± 10%; p = 0.25) or QRS duration (123 ± 33ms vs. 130 ± 29ms) between the LBBAP and LP groups. There was a high burden of ventricular pacing in both groups (90% ± 19% vs. 92% ± 13%; p = 0.52). After a follow-up of 14 ± 8 months, the incidence of PICM was significantly lower in the LBBAP group compared to the LP group (4.3% vs. 24%; p = 0.0039).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients who are not candidates for cardiac resynchronization, who require a high burden of ventricular pacing, LBBAP may lead to a lower incidence of PICM than right ventricular septal pacing with a LP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-02048-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-02048-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:慢性右心室(RV)起搏患者有发生起搏性心肌病(PICM)的风险。关于使用无导联起搏器(LP)起搏右室间隔时PICM发生率的数据有限。左束支区起搏(LBBAP)已成为一种可行的替代RV起搏的方法,具有低发生率的PICM。方法:筛选所有在2021年1月至2023年1月期间在单一中心接受能够提供房室(AV)同步起搏的LP或带有LBBAP导联(无流明或风格驱动导联)的永久性起搏器(PPM)用于房室阻断的患者。如果患者术前和术后均有经胸超声心动图、术前和术后心电图,且起搏负荷≥20%,则纳入最终分析。PICM的发生率,定义为左心室射血分数(LVEF)下降≥20%并达到一定值。结果:在研究期间,533例ppm植入用于房室阻断。其中95例患者符合纳入标准;LBBAP 70例,LPs 25例。人口平均年龄75±13岁;64人(63%)为男性。两组术前平均LVEF(57%±16% vs 61%±10%)无差异;p = 0.25)或QRS持续时间(123±33ms vs 130±29ms)。两组患者心室起搏负荷均较高(90%±19% vs. 92%±13%;p = 0.52)。随访14±8个月后,与LP组相比,LBBAP组PICM的发生率显著降低(4.3% vs 24%;p = 0.0039)。结论:在非心脏再同步化候选患者中,需要高心室起搏负担的患者,LBBAP可能导致PICM的发生率低于右室间隔起搏合并LP。
Incidence of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: left bundle branch area pacing versus leadless pacing.
Background: Patients with chronic right ventricular (RV) pacing are at risk for developing pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM). Data regarding the incidence of PICM when pacing the RV septum using a leadless pacemaker (LP) are limited. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has emerged as a viable alternative to RV pacing with a low incidence of PICM.
Methods: All patients who received either a LP capable of providing atrioventricular (AV) synchronous pacing or a permanent pacemaker (PPM) with a LBBAP lead (lumenless or stylet-driven leads) for AV block between January 2021 and January 2023 at a single center were screened. Patients were included in the final analysis if they had both a pre- and post-operative transthoracic echocardiogram, pre- and post-operative electrocardiograms, and a pacing burden of ≥ 20%. The incidence of PICM, defined as a decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by ≥ 20% and to a value < 50% after a follow-up of at least six months, was compared between LBBAP and LP groups.
Results: Over the study period, 533 PPMs were implanted for AV block. Of these, 95 patients met the inclusion criteria; 70 underwent LBBAP and 25 received LPs. The average age of the population was 75 ± 13 years; 64 (63%) were men. There was no difference in the mean pre-operative LVEF (57% ± 16% vs. 61% ± 10%; p = 0.25) or QRS duration (123 ± 33ms vs. 130 ± 29ms) between the LBBAP and LP groups. There was a high burden of ventricular pacing in both groups (90% ± 19% vs. 92% ± 13%; p = 0.52). After a follow-up of 14 ± 8 months, the incidence of PICM was significantly lower in the LBBAP group compared to the LP group (4.3% vs. 24%; p = 0.0039).
Conclusion: In patients who are not candidates for cardiac resynchronization, who require a high burden of ventricular pacing, LBBAP may lead to a lower incidence of PICM than right ventricular septal pacing with a LP.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.