有效机械振动频率对犬齿运动加速的影响:随机对照试验研究的系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Tadd Lalitwageewong, Chidchanok Leethanakul, Teepawat Witeerungrot
{"title":"有效机械振动频率对犬齿运动加速的影响:随机对照试验研究的系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Tadd Lalitwageewong, Chidchanok Leethanakul, Teepawat Witeerungrot","doi":"10.1007/s00784-025-06338-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of various supplementary vibrational frequencies with orthodontic force on the rate of canine movement.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar, with the final search on February 17, 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving participants undergoing orthodontic treatment with upper first premolar extraction, assessed the effect of different vibration frequencies on canine movement rate were included. Study quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias (RoB) 2. A random-effects model (DerSimonian and Laird method) for pairwise meta-analysis (PMA) and a frequentist-based network meta-analysis (NMA) estimated relative effects, with mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) calculated for all comparisons. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten RCTs examined the effects of five vibration frequencies. The RoB ranged from low to high. The PMA found vibrations significantly increased tooth movement (MD = 0.084 mm, 95% CI [0.004, 0.164]). Conversely, NMA showed no significant differences across all comparisons. The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve ranked 125 Hz as the most effective, followed by 100, 60, 30, and 0 Hz. The confidence in evidence ranged from low to moderate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of supplementary vibration in conjunction with orthodontic force statistically effectively accelerates tooth movement, with higher frequencies showing a tendency to yield better acceleration results.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>While vibration therapy demonstrated a statistically significant effect on canine movement, the magnitude of this effect was not sufficient to be considered clinically significant for orthodontic treatment. Further research is required to optimize the effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"29 6","pages":"292"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effective mechanical vibration frequency in canine tooth movement acceleration: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial studies.\",\"authors\":\"Tadd Lalitwageewong, Chidchanok Leethanakul, Teepawat Witeerungrot\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00784-025-06338-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of various supplementary vibrational frequencies with orthodontic force on the rate of canine movement.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar, with the final search on February 17, 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving participants undergoing orthodontic treatment with upper first premolar extraction, assessed the effect of different vibration frequencies on canine movement rate were included. Study quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias (RoB) 2. A random-effects model (DerSimonian and Laird method) for pairwise meta-analysis (PMA) and a frequentist-based network meta-analysis (NMA) estimated relative effects, with mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) calculated for all comparisons. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten RCTs examined the effects of five vibration frequencies. The RoB ranged from low to high. The PMA found vibrations significantly increased tooth movement (MD = 0.084 mm, 95% CI [0.004, 0.164]). Conversely, NMA showed no significant differences across all comparisons. The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve ranked 125 Hz as the most effective, followed by 100, 60, 30, and 0 Hz. The confidence in evidence ranged from low to moderate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of supplementary vibration in conjunction with orthodontic force statistically effectively accelerates tooth movement, with higher frequencies showing a tendency to yield better acceleration results.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>While vibration therapy demonstrated a statistically significant effect on canine movement, the magnitude of this effect was not sufficient to be considered clinically significant for orthodontic treatment. Further research is required to optimize the effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oral Investigations\",\"volume\":\"29 6\",\"pages\":\"292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oral Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06338-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06338-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究正畸力辅助振动频率对犬运动速度的影响。材料和方法:在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane、Scopus、ClinicalTrials.gov和谷歌Scholar中进行文献检索,最终检索时间为2025年2月17日。采用随机对照试验(RCTs),评估不同振动频率对犬运动速率的影响。采用风险偏倚(Risk of Bias, RoB) 2评价研究质量。两两荟萃分析(PMA)的随机效应模型(DerSimonian和Laird方法)和基于频率的网络荟萃分析(NMA)估计相对效应,计算所有比较的平均差(MD)和95%置信区间(CI)。证据的确定性使用网络置信度meta分析工具进行评估。结果:10项随机对照试验检查了5种振动频率的影响。抢劫从低到高不等。PMA发现振动显著增加了牙齿运动(MD = 0.084 mm, 95% CI[0.004, 0.164])。相反,NMA在所有比较中没有显着差异。在The Surface Under The Cumulative Ranking Curve中,125 Hz是最有效的,其次是100、60、30和0 Hz。证据的可信度从低到中等不等。结论:辅助振动配合正畸力的使用在统计学上能有效加速牙齿移动,频率越高加速效果越好。临床相关性:虽然振动疗法对犬类运动有统计学上显著的影响,但这种影响的程度不足以被认为在正畸治疗中具有临床意义。需要进一步的研究来优化其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effective mechanical vibration frequency in canine tooth movement acceleration: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial studies.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of various supplementary vibrational frequencies with orthodontic force on the rate of canine movement.

Materials and methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar, with the final search on February 17, 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving participants undergoing orthodontic treatment with upper first premolar extraction, assessed the effect of different vibration frequencies on canine movement rate were included. Study quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias (RoB) 2. A random-effects model (DerSimonian and Laird method) for pairwise meta-analysis (PMA) and a frequentist-based network meta-analysis (NMA) estimated relative effects, with mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) calculated for all comparisons. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis tool.

Results: Ten RCTs examined the effects of five vibration frequencies. The RoB ranged from low to high. The PMA found vibrations significantly increased tooth movement (MD = 0.084 mm, 95% CI [0.004, 0.164]). Conversely, NMA showed no significant differences across all comparisons. The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve ranked 125 Hz as the most effective, followed by 100, 60, 30, and 0 Hz. The confidence in evidence ranged from low to moderate.

Conclusions: The use of supplementary vibration in conjunction with orthodontic force statistically effectively accelerates tooth movement, with higher frequencies showing a tendency to yield better acceleration results.

Clinical relevance: While vibration therapy demonstrated a statistically significant effect on canine movement, the magnitude of this effect was not sufficient to be considered clinically significant for orthodontic treatment. Further research is required to optimize the effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信