回顾性回顾MagnetOs Easypack PuttyTM骨移植物单独用于经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术。

IF 1.4 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedic Reviews Pub Date : 2025-04-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.52965/001c.133986
Justin Davis, Brian Everist, Casey Hatfield, Katherine Sage
{"title":"回顾性回顾MagnetOs Easypack PuttyTM骨移植物单独用于经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术。","authors":"Justin Davis, Brian Everist, Casey Hatfield, Katherine Sage","doi":"10.52965/001c.133986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal fusion surgeries remain a successful treatment for degenerative disc disease. While autograft is considered the gold standard bone graft, synthetic bone void fillers are increasingly used to limit donor site morbidity while giving sufficient graft volume.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective clinical study evaluates MagnetOs Easypack Putty<sup>TM</sup> as a standalone graft without autograft in interbody fusion. An independent radiologist blinded to the clinical status provided evaluation of computed tomography (CT) images obtained at 12 months and graded each treated level based on the Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser (BSF) Classification. Twenty subjects were enrolled in the study. A total of 36 spinal levels were treated with an average of 1.8 levels per subject (L2-L3 to L5-S1).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary endpoint of CT-based fusion was 94.4% (34/36 levels) based on the presence of bridging bone or locked pseudoarthrosis at 12 months. The high fusion rate was accompanied by consistent improvement in pain scores. Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores decreased an average of 25% from 5.3/10 pre-operatively to 2.8/10 at 12 months post-operative, and all subjects who reported pre-operative back or leg pain reported improved pain post-operatively. Although the patient population included risk factors and comorbidities, the fusion rate remained high, and no device-related adverse events (AEs) were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The high fusion rate and favorable safety profile support the performance of MagnetOs Easypack Putty for standalone use without autograft in interbody fusion procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":19669,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Reviews","volume":"17 ","pages":"133986"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12045331/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A retrospective review of MagnetOs Easypack Putty<sup>TM</sup> bone graft used standalone in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.\",\"authors\":\"Justin Davis, Brian Everist, Casey Hatfield, Katherine Sage\",\"doi\":\"10.52965/001c.133986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal fusion surgeries remain a successful treatment for degenerative disc disease. While autograft is considered the gold standard bone graft, synthetic bone void fillers are increasingly used to limit donor site morbidity while giving sufficient graft volume.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective clinical study evaluates MagnetOs Easypack Putty<sup>TM</sup> as a standalone graft without autograft in interbody fusion. An independent radiologist blinded to the clinical status provided evaluation of computed tomography (CT) images obtained at 12 months and graded each treated level based on the Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser (BSF) Classification. Twenty subjects were enrolled in the study. A total of 36 spinal levels were treated with an average of 1.8 levels per subject (L2-L3 to L5-S1).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary endpoint of CT-based fusion was 94.4% (34/36 levels) based on the presence of bridging bone or locked pseudoarthrosis at 12 months. The high fusion rate was accompanied by consistent improvement in pain scores. Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores decreased an average of 25% from 5.3/10 pre-operatively to 2.8/10 at 12 months post-operative, and all subjects who reported pre-operative back or leg pain reported improved pain post-operatively. Although the patient population included risk factors and comorbidities, the fusion rate remained high, and no device-related adverse events (AEs) were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The high fusion rate and favorable safety profile support the performance of MagnetOs Easypack Putty for standalone use without autograft in interbody fusion procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopedic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"133986\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12045331/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopedic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.133986\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.133986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脊柱融合手术仍然是治疗退行性椎间盘疾病的成功方法。虽然自体骨移植被认为是金标准的骨移植,但合成骨空洞填充物越来越多地用于限制供体部位的发病率,同时提供足够的移植物体积。方法:本回顾性临床研究评估了MagnetOs Easypack PuttyTM作为独立移植物在体间融合中的应用。一位不了解临床状况的独立放射科医生对12个月获得的计算机断层扫描(CT)图像进行了评估,并根据Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser (BSF)分类对每个治疗水平进行了分级。20名受试者参加了这项研究。共治疗36个脊柱节段,平均每个受试者1.8个节段(L2-L3至L5-S1)。结果:基于ct融合的主要终点为94.4%(34/36节段),基于12个月时桥接骨或锁定假关节的存在。高融合率伴随着疼痛评分的持续改善。视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分从术前的5.3/10平均下降25%至术后12个月的2.8/10,所有报告术前背部或腿部疼痛的受试者均报告术后疼痛改善。尽管患者人群中存在危险因素和合并症,但融合率仍然很高,没有观察到与器械相关的不良事件(ae)。结论:高融合率和良好的安全性支持MagnetOs Easypack Putty在体间融合手术中无需自体移植物即可独立使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A retrospective review of MagnetOs Easypack PuttyTM bone graft used standalone in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Background: Spinal fusion surgeries remain a successful treatment for degenerative disc disease. While autograft is considered the gold standard bone graft, synthetic bone void fillers are increasingly used to limit donor site morbidity while giving sufficient graft volume.

Methods: This retrospective clinical study evaluates MagnetOs Easypack PuttyTM as a standalone graft without autograft in interbody fusion. An independent radiologist blinded to the clinical status provided evaluation of computed tomography (CT) images obtained at 12 months and graded each treated level based on the Brantigan-Steffee-Fraser (BSF) Classification. Twenty subjects were enrolled in the study. A total of 36 spinal levels were treated with an average of 1.8 levels per subject (L2-L3 to L5-S1).

Results: The primary endpoint of CT-based fusion was 94.4% (34/36 levels) based on the presence of bridging bone or locked pseudoarthrosis at 12 months. The high fusion rate was accompanied by consistent improvement in pain scores. Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores decreased an average of 25% from 5.3/10 pre-operatively to 2.8/10 at 12 months post-operative, and all subjects who reported pre-operative back or leg pain reported improved pain post-operatively. Although the patient population included risk factors and comorbidities, the fusion rate remained high, and no device-related adverse events (AEs) were observed.

Conclusions: The high fusion rate and favorable safety profile support the performance of MagnetOs Easypack Putty for standalone use without autograft in interbody fusion procedures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopedic Reviews
Orthopedic Reviews ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
122
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Reviews is an Open Access, online-only, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles concerned with any aspect of orthopedics, as well as diagnosis and treatment, trauma, surgical procedures, arthroscopy, sports medicine, rehabilitation, pediatric and geriatric orthopedics. All bone-related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology and epidemiology papers are also welcome. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, reviews and case reports of general interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信