功能性鼻中隔成形术患者满意度:非手术因素的作用。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Miguel Arede Antunes, Rita Fernandes, Rita Peça, Paulo Martins, Leonel Luís
{"title":"功能性鼻中隔成形术患者满意度:非手术因素的作用。","authors":"Miguel Arede Antunes, Rita Fernandes, Rita Peça, Paulo Martins, Leonel Luís","doi":"10.1055/a-2585-5426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Functional rhinoseptoplasty (FRS) is a surgical procedure with both functional and aesthetic impacts, significantly affecting patients' quality of life. The influence of nonsurgical factors on FRS outcomes remains a debated topic in the literature. For instance, some authors deny the long-term impact of gender, age, inferior turbinectomy, or active smoking on the results. The rhinoplasty outcome evaluation (ROE) questionnaire is a useful tool for assessing patients' satisfaction once submitted to this surgery.To evaluate the subjective impact of nonsurgical factors on the long-term outcomes of FRS.The authors conducted a retrospective study of all patients who underwent FRS at a tertiary hospital between 2019 and 2023. Patients with less than 1 year of postoperative follow-up were excluded. The ROE questionnaire was used to quantify subjective surgical satisfaction. Various variables were analyzed, including previous nasal pyramid trauma, age, known hematologic pathology, psychiatric history, allergic rhinitis, smoking habits, and inferior turbinectomy. Statistical calculations were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis formula.The sample included 75 patients with an average age of 33.4 years, mostly female (51%; <i>n</i> = 38). The average ROE score in the sample was 79.6%. Thirty-eight point seven percent (<i>n</i> = 29) of the procedures were performed after nasal pyramid trauma, with these patients reporting higher ROE scores than others (85.78% in the trauma group; 75.6% in the nontrauma group; <i>p</i>-value = 0.01394). Even though no statistical correlation was demonstrated, ROE scores were also higher in patients with allergic rhinitis (82.1% vs. 78.1% on the healthy group), psychiatric disorders (85.8% vs. 75.6% on the healthy group), hematological disorders (91.7% vs. 78.9% on the healthy group), nonsmokers (81.7% vs. 74.0% on smokers), younger patients (81.7% vs. 76.8% on patients older than 33.4 years) and patients that underwent inferior turbinectomy (81.0% vs. 75.9%).This study established a correlation between the subjective degree of surgical satisfaction and previous nasal trauma in patients undergoing FRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":12195,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Satisfaction in Functional Rhinoseptoplasty: The Role of Nonsurgical Factors.\",\"authors\":\"Miguel Arede Antunes, Rita Fernandes, Rita Peça, Paulo Martins, Leonel Luís\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2585-5426\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Functional rhinoseptoplasty (FRS) is a surgical procedure with both functional and aesthetic impacts, significantly affecting patients' quality of life. The influence of nonsurgical factors on FRS outcomes remains a debated topic in the literature. For instance, some authors deny the long-term impact of gender, age, inferior turbinectomy, or active smoking on the results. The rhinoplasty outcome evaluation (ROE) questionnaire is a useful tool for assessing patients' satisfaction once submitted to this surgery.To evaluate the subjective impact of nonsurgical factors on the long-term outcomes of FRS.The authors conducted a retrospective study of all patients who underwent FRS at a tertiary hospital between 2019 and 2023. Patients with less than 1 year of postoperative follow-up were excluded. The ROE questionnaire was used to quantify subjective surgical satisfaction. Various variables were analyzed, including previous nasal pyramid trauma, age, known hematologic pathology, psychiatric history, allergic rhinitis, smoking habits, and inferior turbinectomy. Statistical calculations were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis formula.The sample included 75 patients with an average age of 33.4 years, mostly female (51%; <i>n</i> = 38). The average ROE score in the sample was 79.6%. Thirty-eight point seven percent (<i>n</i> = 29) of the procedures were performed after nasal pyramid trauma, with these patients reporting higher ROE scores than others (85.78% in the trauma group; 75.6% in the nontrauma group; <i>p</i>-value = 0.01394). Even though no statistical correlation was demonstrated, ROE scores were also higher in patients with allergic rhinitis (82.1% vs. 78.1% on the healthy group), psychiatric disorders (85.8% vs. 75.6% on the healthy group), hematological disorders (91.7% vs. 78.9% on the healthy group), nonsmokers (81.7% vs. 74.0% on smokers), younger patients (81.7% vs. 76.8% on patients older than 33.4 years) and patients that underwent inferior turbinectomy (81.0% vs. 75.9%).This study established a correlation between the subjective degree of surgical satisfaction and previous nasal trauma in patients undergoing FRS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Facial Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Facial Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2585-5426\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facial Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2585-5426","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

功能性鼻中隔成形术(FRS)是一种具有功能和美学双重影响的外科手术,严重影响患者的生活质量。非手术因素对FRS结果的影响在文献中仍然是一个有争议的话题。例如,一些作者否认性别、年龄、下鼻甲切除术或积极吸烟对结果的长期影响。鼻整形结果评估(ROE)问卷是评估患者对该手术满意度的有用工具。为了评估非手术因素对FRS长期预后的主观影响,作者对2019年至2023年在一家三级医院接受FRS治疗的所有患者进行了回顾性研究。排除术后随访时间少于1年的患者。ROE问卷用于量化主观手术满意度。分析了各种变量,包括以前的鼻锥外伤、年龄、已知的血液病理学、精神病史、过敏性鼻炎、吸烟习惯和下鼻甲切除术。采用Kruskal-Wallis公式进行统计计算。样本包括75例患者,平均年龄33.4岁,大多数为女性(51%;n = 38)。样本平均ROE得分为79.6%。38.7% (n = 29)的手术是在鼻锥外伤后进行的,这些患者报告的ROE评分高于其他患者(创伤组85.78%;非创伤组为75.6%;p值= 0.01394)。尽管没有统计学相关性,但变应性鼻炎(健康组为82.1%比78.1%)、精神疾病(健康组为85.8%比75.6%)、血液系统疾病(健康组为91.7%比78.9%)、非吸烟者(吸烟者为81.7%比74.0%)、年轻患者(年龄大于33.4岁的患者为81.7%比76.8%)和行下鼻甲切除术的患者(81.0%比75.9%)的ROE评分也较高。本研究建立了FRS患者主观手术满意度与既往鼻外伤之间的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient Satisfaction in Functional Rhinoseptoplasty: The Role of Nonsurgical Factors.

Functional rhinoseptoplasty (FRS) is a surgical procedure with both functional and aesthetic impacts, significantly affecting patients' quality of life. The influence of nonsurgical factors on FRS outcomes remains a debated topic in the literature. For instance, some authors deny the long-term impact of gender, age, inferior turbinectomy, or active smoking on the results. The rhinoplasty outcome evaluation (ROE) questionnaire is a useful tool for assessing patients' satisfaction once submitted to this surgery.To evaluate the subjective impact of nonsurgical factors on the long-term outcomes of FRS.The authors conducted a retrospective study of all patients who underwent FRS at a tertiary hospital between 2019 and 2023. Patients with less than 1 year of postoperative follow-up were excluded. The ROE questionnaire was used to quantify subjective surgical satisfaction. Various variables were analyzed, including previous nasal pyramid trauma, age, known hematologic pathology, psychiatric history, allergic rhinitis, smoking habits, and inferior turbinectomy. Statistical calculations were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis formula.The sample included 75 patients with an average age of 33.4 years, mostly female (51%; n = 38). The average ROE score in the sample was 79.6%. Thirty-eight point seven percent (n = 29) of the procedures were performed after nasal pyramid trauma, with these patients reporting higher ROE scores than others (85.78% in the trauma group; 75.6% in the nontrauma group; p-value = 0.01394). Even though no statistical correlation was demonstrated, ROE scores were also higher in patients with allergic rhinitis (82.1% vs. 78.1% on the healthy group), psychiatric disorders (85.8% vs. 75.6% on the healthy group), hematological disorders (91.7% vs. 78.9% on the healthy group), nonsmokers (81.7% vs. 74.0% on smokers), younger patients (81.7% vs. 76.8% on patients older than 33.4 years) and patients that underwent inferior turbinectomy (81.0% vs. 75.9%).This study established a correlation between the subjective degree of surgical satisfaction and previous nasal trauma in patients undergoing FRS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Facial Plastic Surgery
Facial Plastic Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Facial Plastic Surgery is a journal that publishes topic-specific issues covering areas of aesthetic and reconstructive plastic surgery as it relates to the head, neck, and face. The journal''s scope includes issues devoted to scar revision, periorbital and mid-face rejuvenation, facial trauma, facial implants, rhinoplasty, neck reconstruction, cleft palate, face lifts, as well as various other emerging minimally invasive procedures. Authors provide a global perspective on each topic, critically evaluate recent works in the field, and apply it to clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信