加强晚期癌症护理中主动维持生命的治疗偏好文件:障碍和建议。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Lisa Choucroun, Pierre Gérain
{"title":"加强晚期癌症护理中主动维持生命的治疗偏好文件:障碍和建议。","authors":"Lisa Choucroun, Pierre Gérain","doi":"10.1097/CCO.0000000000001144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Despite guidelines, life-sustaining treatment preferences (LSTP) documentation for advanced cancer patients remains limited and reactive to clinical events. As proactive documentation is a core component of early palliative care (EPC), addressing barriers to EPC can in parallel facilitate LSTP documentation. This narrative review examines barriers to both processes and proposes recommendations to overcome them.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Barriers stem from patients, oncologists, and the healthcare system. Patients and oncologists face communication challenges. For patients, knowledge gaps on illness and LSTP documentation, family dynamics prioritizing informal over formal discussions, and limited intercultural considerations, compound these challenges. For oncologists, a curative-focused medical culture reinforces them. In the healthcare system, this culture contributes to deprioritizing LSTP documentation.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Addressing these barriers requires multilevel recommendations. For patients: interventions to enhance illness understanding, foster culturally sensitive oncologist communication, and optimize care organization. For oncologists: integrating communication training and palliative care (PC) knowledge into oncology fellowships while cultivating a supportive medical culture for LSTP documentation through role modeling and intervision. For healthcare systems: LSTP documentation benchmarks, proactive EPC integration through automated reminders, telehealth, standardized medical records, and reimbursement codes. Assessing the implementation and sustainability of these recommendations is crucial to enhancing proactive LSTP documentation in advanced cancer care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10893,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing proactive life-sustaining treatment preference documentation in advanced cancer care: barriers and recommendations.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Choucroun, Pierre Gérain\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCO.0000000000001144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Despite guidelines, life-sustaining treatment preferences (LSTP) documentation for advanced cancer patients remains limited and reactive to clinical events. As proactive documentation is a core component of early palliative care (EPC), addressing barriers to EPC can in parallel facilitate LSTP documentation. This narrative review examines barriers to both processes and proposes recommendations to overcome them.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Barriers stem from patients, oncologists, and the healthcare system. Patients and oncologists face communication challenges. For patients, knowledge gaps on illness and LSTP documentation, family dynamics prioritizing informal over formal discussions, and limited intercultural considerations, compound these challenges. For oncologists, a curative-focused medical culture reinforces them. In the healthcare system, this culture contributes to deprioritizing LSTP documentation.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Addressing these barriers requires multilevel recommendations. For patients: interventions to enhance illness understanding, foster culturally sensitive oncologist communication, and optimize care organization. For oncologists: integrating communication training and palliative care (PC) knowledge into oncology fellowships while cultivating a supportive medical culture for LSTP documentation through role modeling and intervision. For healthcare systems: LSTP documentation benchmarks, proactive EPC integration through automated reminders, telehealth, standardized medical records, and reimbursement codes. Assessing the implementation and sustainability of these recommendations is crucial to enhancing proactive LSTP documentation in advanced cancer care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000001144\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000001144","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:尽管有指南,晚期癌症患者的生命维持治疗偏好(LSTP)文件仍然有限,并且对临床事件有反应。由于主动记录是早期姑息治疗(EPC)的核心组成部分,解决EPC的障碍可以同时促进LSTP的记录。本叙述性审查审查了这两个进程的障碍,并提出了克服这些障碍的建议。最近的研究发现:障碍来自患者、肿瘤学家和医疗保健系统。患者和肿瘤学家面临着沟通方面的挑战。对于患者来说,疾病和LSTP文件的知识差距,家庭动态优先考虑非正式讨论而不是正式讨论,以及有限的跨文化考虑,使这些挑战更加复杂。对肿瘤学家来说,注重治疗的医疗文化会强化他们的能力。在医疗保健系统中,这种文化导致LSTP文档的优先级降低。摘要:解决这些障碍需要多层次的建议。对患者:干预措施,以提高疾病的理解,培养文化敏感的肿瘤学家沟通,并优化护理组织。对于肿瘤学家:将沟通培训和姑息治疗(PC)知识整合到肿瘤学奖学金中,同时通过角色示范和访谈培养支持LSTP文档的医学文化。对于医疗保健系统:LSTP文档基准、通过自动提醒进行的主动EPC集成、远程医疗、标准化医疗记录和报销代码。评估这些建议的实施和可持续性对于加强晚期癌症治疗中主动的LSTP记录至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing proactive life-sustaining treatment preference documentation in advanced cancer care: barriers and recommendations.

Purpose of review: Despite guidelines, life-sustaining treatment preferences (LSTP) documentation for advanced cancer patients remains limited and reactive to clinical events. As proactive documentation is a core component of early palliative care (EPC), addressing barriers to EPC can in parallel facilitate LSTP documentation. This narrative review examines barriers to both processes and proposes recommendations to overcome them.

Recent findings: Barriers stem from patients, oncologists, and the healthcare system. Patients and oncologists face communication challenges. For patients, knowledge gaps on illness and LSTP documentation, family dynamics prioritizing informal over formal discussions, and limited intercultural considerations, compound these challenges. For oncologists, a curative-focused medical culture reinforces them. In the healthcare system, this culture contributes to deprioritizing LSTP documentation.

Summary: Addressing these barriers requires multilevel recommendations. For patients: interventions to enhance illness understanding, foster culturally sensitive oncologist communication, and optimize care organization. For oncologists: integrating communication training and palliative care (PC) knowledge into oncology fellowships while cultivating a supportive medical culture for LSTP documentation through role modeling and intervision. For healthcare systems: LSTP documentation benchmarks, proactive EPC integration through automated reminders, telehealth, standardized medical records, and reimbursement codes. Assessing the implementation and sustainability of these recommendations is crucial to enhancing proactive LSTP documentation in advanced cancer care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Oncology
Current Opinion in Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: With its easy-to-digest reviews on important advances in world literature, Current Opinion in Oncology offers expert evaluation on a wide range of topics from sixteen key disciplines including sarcomas, cancer biology, melanoma and endocrine tumors. Published bimonthly, each issue covers in detail the most pertinent advances in these fields from the previous year. This is supplemented by annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信