胸腔开胸术在肋骨骨折手术稳定中去除多余液体:T-REX试验

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Sarah Majercik, Scott Gardner, Evert A Eriksson, Joseph D Forrester, Joshua A Villarreal, Zachary M Bauman, Lindsey Cavlovic, Andrew R Doben, Gregory R Semon, Fredric M Pieracci, Theresa Morin, Kelley Mancine, Zachary D Warriner, Caroline Neff, SarahAnn S Whitbeck, Thomas W White
{"title":"胸腔开胸术在肋骨骨折手术稳定中去除多余液体:T-REX试验","authors":"Sarah Majercik, Scott Gardner, Evert A Eriksson, Joseph D Forrester, Joshua A Villarreal, Zachary M Bauman, Lindsey Cavlovic, Andrew R Doben, Gregory R Semon, Fredric M Pieracci, Theresa Morin, Kelley Mancine, Zachary D Warriner, Caroline Neff, SarahAnn S Whitbeck, Thomas W White","doi":"10.1007/s00068-025-02845-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Management of the pleural space during and after SSRF is a matter of debate. Tube thoracostomy (TT), intra-operative pleural lavage (PL) and video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) use varies between surgeons. The purpose of this study is to describe differences in practice patterns of pleural space management (TT, PL, VATS) after SSRF at institutions with extensive experience in chest wall reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective data from adult SSRF patients at eight U.S. trauma centers between January 1, 2020 and September 1, 2022 was collected. Patients were managed according to institutional protocols. Outcome measures included hospital and ICU length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, infectious complications, and incidence of procedural re-intervention. Discrete variables are reported as median (IQR). P-values for continuous variables were obtained using Kruskal-Wallis, and for categorical variables using Chi-square.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>273 patients from 8 centers were included. Median age was 60 (46-68), 70% were male, and 99% suffered blunt trauma. ISS was 17 (13-26), ranging from a low of 14 (10-19) to 26 (18-35) (p = 0.002). Median operative time was 2.5 (1.9-3.3) hours, with 5 (4-6) plates placed. VATS ranged from 2 to 78% at each center and PL ranged from 25 to 100% (p < 0.001). Almost all patients received TT. TT remained in place for 3 (2-4) days, few (2%) had any complication related to the TT, nor did they require drain replacement (7%) or reoperation (2%). ICU and hospital lengths of stay were 3 (2-6) and 8 (6-13) days (P < 0.001). Readmission rates were low (4%), and did not differ between centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At centers experienced in SSRF, there is variation in management of the pleural space. While ICU and hospital lengths of stay are different between centers, rates of reoperation and readmission are similar. Further study is needed to delineate optimal management of the pleural space after SSRF.</p>","PeriodicalId":12064,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","volume":"51 1","pages":"174"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thoracostomy for removal of excess fluid in surgical stabilization of rib fractures: the T-REX trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Majercik, Scott Gardner, Evert A Eriksson, Joseph D Forrester, Joshua A Villarreal, Zachary M Bauman, Lindsey Cavlovic, Andrew R Doben, Gregory R Semon, Fredric M Pieracci, Theresa Morin, Kelley Mancine, Zachary D Warriner, Caroline Neff, SarahAnn S Whitbeck, Thomas W White\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00068-025-02845-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Management of the pleural space during and after SSRF is a matter of debate. Tube thoracostomy (TT), intra-operative pleural lavage (PL) and video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) use varies between surgeons. The purpose of this study is to describe differences in practice patterns of pleural space management (TT, PL, VATS) after SSRF at institutions with extensive experience in chest wall reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective data from adult SSRF patients at eight U.S. trauma centers between January 1, 2020 and September 1, 2022 was collected. Patients were managed according to institutional protocols. Outcome measures included hospital and ICU length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, infectious complications, and incidence of procedural re-intervention. Discrete variables are reported as median (IQR). P-values for continuous variables were obtained using Kruskal-Wallis, and for categorical variables using Chi-square.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>273 patients from 8 centers were included. Median age was 60 (46-68), 70% were male, and 99% suffered blunt trauma. ISS was 17 (13-26), ranging from a low of 14 (10-19) to 26 (18-35) (p = 0.002). Median operative time was 2.5 (1.9-3.3) hours, with 5 (4-6) plates placed. VATS ranged from 2 to 78% at each center and PL ranged from 25 to 100% (p < 0.001). Almost all patients received TT. TT remained in place for 3 (2-4) days, few (2%) had any complication related to the TT, nor did they require drain replacement (7%) or reoperation (2%). ICU and hospital lengths of stay were 3 (2-6) and 8 (6-13) days (P < 0.001). Readmission rates were low (4%), and did not differ between centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At centers experienced in SSRF, there is variation in management of the pleural space. While ICU and hospital lengths of stay are different between centers, rates of reoperation and readmission are similar. Further study is needed to delineate optimal management of the pleural space after SSRF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-025-02845-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-025-02845-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胸膜腔在SSRF期间和之后的管理是一个有争议的问题。导管开胸术(TT),术中胸腔灌洗术(PL)和视频辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)的使用因外科医生而异。本研究的目的是描述具有丰富胸壁重建经验的机构在SSRF后胸膜空间管理(TT, PL, VATS)的实践模式的差异。方法:收集2020年1月1日至2022年9月1日期间来自美国8个创伤中心的成人SSRF患者的前瞻性数据。根据机构方案对患者进行管理。结果测量包括住院和ICU住院时间、30天再入院率、感染并发症和手术再干预的发生率。离散变量报告为中位数(IQR)。连续变量的p值采用Kruskal-Wallis法,分类变量的p值采用卡方法。结果:共纳入来自8个中心的273例患者。中位年龄60岁(46-68岁),70%为男性,99%为钝性创伤。ISS为17(13-26),最低为14(10-19)至26 (18-35)(p = 0.002)。中位手术时间2.5(1.9-3.3)小时,放置5(4-6)个钢板。每个中心的VATS范围为2%至78%,PL范围为25%至100% (p结论:在经历过SSRF的中心,胸膜腔的处理存在差异。虽然各中心的ICU和住院时间不同,但再手术率和再入院率相似。需要进一步研究确定SSRF后胸膜腔的最佳处理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thoracostomy for removal of excess fluid in surgical stabilization of rib fractures: the T-REX trial.

Background: Management of the pleural space during and after SSRF is a matter of debate. Tube thoracostomy (TT), intra-operative pleural lavage (PL) and video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) use varies between surgeons. The purpose of this study is to describe differences in practice patterns of pleural space management (TT, PL, VATS) after SSRF at institutions with extensive experience in chest wall reconstruction.

Methods: Prospective data from adult SSRF patients at eight U.S. trauma centers between January 1, 2020 and September 1, 2022 was collected. Patients were managed according to institutional protocols. Outcome measures included hospital and ICU length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, infectious complications, and incidence of procedural re-intervention. Discrete variables are reported as median (IQR). P-values for continuous variables were obtained using Kruskal-Wallis, and for categorical variables using Chi-square.

Results: 273 patients from 8 centers were included. Median age was 60 (46-68), 70% were male, and 99% suffered blunt trauma. ISS was 17 (13-26), ranging from a low of 14 (10-19) to 26 (18-35) (p = 0.002). Median operative time was 2.5 (1.9-3.3) hours, with 5 (4-6) plates placed. VATS ranged from 2 to 78% at each center and PL ranged from 25 to 100% (p < 0.001). Almost all patients received TT. TT remained in place for 3 (2-4) days, few (2%) had any complication related to the TT, nor did they require drain replacement (7%) or reoperation (2%). ICU and hospital lengths of stay were 3 (2-6) and 8 (6-13) days (P < 0.001). Readmission rates were low (4%), and did not differ between centers.

Conclusion: At centers experienced in SSRF, there is variation in management of the pleural space. While ICU and hospital lengths of stay are different between centers, rates of reoperation and readmission are similar. Further study is needed to delineate optimal management of the pleural space after SSRF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
311
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery aims to open an interdisciplinary forum that allows for the scientific exchange between basic and clinical science related to pathophysiology, diagnostics and treatment of traumatized patients. The journal covers all aspects of clinical management, operative treatment and related research of traumatic injuries. Clinical and experimental papers on issues relevant for the improvement of trauma care are published. Reviews, original articles, short communications and letters allow the appropriate presentation of major and minor topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信