中隔成形术中常规与超声骨切割对术后眼压影响的比较。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Ercan Atasoy, Burak Kaan İnan, İbrahim Sayın, Kamil Hakan Kaya
{"title":"中隔成形术中常规与超声骨切割对术后眼压影响的比较。","authors":"Ercan Atasoy, Burak Kaan İnan, İbrahim Sayın, Kamil Hakan Kaya","doi":"10.1055/a-2588-9688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Septorhinoplasty is a complex facial surgery that involves osteotomy, a procedure that can lead to complications such as postoperative edema, ecchymosis, and potential changes in intraocular pressure (IOP). However, there is limited research on how different osteotomy techniques, such as conventional osteotomy versus ultrasonic bone cutting, affect IOP.This study aimed to compare the effects of conventional osteotomy and ultrasonic bone cutting on IOP in patients undergoing septorhinoplasty. We hypothesized that ultrasonic osteotomy would result in less change in IOP compared to conventional osteotomy.Prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled study conducted at a tertiary referral hospital in Turkey. The study adhered to the CONSORT guidelines for randomized trials.Sixty patients undergoing septorhinoplasty were randomly assigned to either the conventional osteotomy group or the ultrasonic osteotomy group. IOP was measured preoperatively, on postoperative day 1, and on postoperative day 7 using noncontact tonometry. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 25.0 with repeated measures analysis.No significant difference in IOP was observed between groups on postoperative day 7. However, the conventional osteotomy group showed a significant increase in IOP on postoperative day 1 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), with a subsequent decrease by day 7. The ultrasonic osteotomy group showed no significant IOP change.Ultrasonic bone cutting for osteotomy in septorhinoplasty results in more stable IOP compared to conventional osteotomy, making it potentially safer for patients at risk of glaucoma. Further studies with longer follow-ups are required to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12195,"journal":{"name":"Facial Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Effects of Conventional and Ultrasonic Bone Cutting in Septorhinoplasty Surgery on Intraocular Pressure in the Postoperative Period.\",\"authors\":\"Ercan Atasoy, Burak Kaan İnan, İbrahim Sayın, Kamil Hakan Kaya\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2588-9688\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Septorhinoplasty is a complex facial surgery that involves osteotomy, a procedure that can lead to complications such as postoperative edema, ecchymosis, and potential changes in intraocular pressure (IOP). However, there is limited research on how different osteotomy techniques, such as conventional osteotomy versus ultrasonic bone cutting, affect IOP.This study aimed to compare the effects of conventional osteotomy and ultrasonic bone cutting on IOP in patients undergoing septorhinoplasty. We hypothesized that ultrasonic osteotomy would result in less change in IOP compared to conventional osteotomy.Prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled study conducted at a tertiary referral hospital in Turkey. The study adhered to the CONSORT guidelines for randomized trials.Sixty patients undergoing septorhinoplasty were randomly assigned to either the conventional osteotomy group or the ultrasonic osteotomy group. IOP was measured preoperatively, on postoperative day 1, and on postoperative day 7 using noncontact tonometry. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 25.0 with repeated measures analysis.No significant difference in IOP was observed between groups on postoperative day 7. However, the conventional osteotomy group showed a significant increase in IOP on postoperative day 1 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), with a subsequent decrease by day 7. The ultrasonic osteotomy group showed no significant IOP change.Ultrasonic bone cutting for osteotomy in septorhinoplasty results in more stable IOP compared to conventional osteotomy, making it potentially safer for patients at risk of glaucoma. Further studies with longer follow-ups are required to confirm these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Facial Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Facial Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2588-9688\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facial Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2588-9688","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鼻中隔成形术是一项复杂的面部手术,包括截骨术,该手术可导致术后水肿、瘀斑和潜在的眼压变化等并发症。然而,关于不同的截骨技术,如常规截骨与超声截骨对IOP的影响的研究有限。目的与假设本研究旨在比较常规截骨术与超声截骨术对鼻中隔成形术患者IOP的影响。我们假设与常规截骨术相比,超声截骨术对IOP的影响较小。研究设计在土耳其一家三级转诊医院进行的前瞻性、双盲、随机对照研究。该研究遵循CONSORT随机试验指南。方法将60例鼻中隔成形术患者随机分为常规截骨组和超声截骨组。术前、术后第1天和术后第7天分别用非接触式眼压计测量IOP。统计学分析采用SPSS 25.0版本进行重复测量分析。结果术后第7天,两组患者IOP差异无统计学意义。然而,常规截骨组术后第1天IOP显著升高(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the Effects of Conventional and Ultrasonic Bone Cutting in Septorhinoplasty Surgery on Intraocular Pressure in the Postoperative Period.

Septorhinoplasty is a complex facial surgery that involves osteotomy, a procedure that can lead to complications such as postoperative edema, ecchymosis, and potential changes in intraocular pressure (IOP). However, there is limited research on how different osteotomy techniques, such as conventional osteotomy versus ultrasonic bone cutting, affect IOP.This study aimed to compare the effects of conventional osteotomy and ultrasonic bone cutting on IOP in patients undergoing septorhinoplasty. We hypothesized that ultrasonic osteotomy would result in less change in IOP compared to conventional osteotomy.Prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled study conducted at a tertiary referral hospital in Turkey. The study adhered to the CONSORT guidelines for randomized trials.Sixty patients undergoing septorhinoplasty were randomly assigned to either the conventional osteotomy group or the ultrasonic osteotomy group. IOP was measured preoperatively, on postoperative day 1, and on postoperative day 7 using noncontact tonometry. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 25.0 with repeated measures analysis.No significant difference in IOP was observed between groups on postoperative day 7. However, the conventional osteotomy group showed a significant increase in IOP on postoperative day 1 (p < 0.001), with a subsequent decrease by day 7. The ultrasonic osteotomy group showed no significant IOP change.Ultrasonic bone cutting for osteotomy in septorhinoplasty results in more stable IOP compared to conventional osteotomy, making it potentially safer for patients at risk of glaucoma. Further studies with longer follow-ups are required to confirm these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Facial Plastic Surgery
Facial Plastic Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Facial Plastic Surgery is a journal that publishes topic-specific issues covering areas of aesthetic and reconstructive plastic surgery as it relates to the head, neck, and face. The journal''s scope includes issues devoted to scar revision, periorbital and mid-face rejuvenation, facial trauma, facial implants, rhinoplasty, neck reconstruction, cleft palate, face lifts, as well as various other emerging minimally invasive procedures. Authors provide a global perspective on each topic, critically evaluate recent works in the field, and apply it to clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信