顺势预防砷30c对COVID-19疫苗相关不良事件的影响:一项联合回顾性-前瞻性队列研究

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Homeopathy Pub Date : 2025-05-12 DOI:10.1055/a-2512-9763
Debadatta Nayak, Ruchika Bhalla, Lovepreet Kaur, Divya Bansal, Smita Singh, Navita Bagdi, James Michael, Abhishek Chaudhuri, Lalit Tyagi, Bhavna Makhija, Shikha Madaan, Deblina Das, Indu Shukla, Srimonti Sanyal, Khan Sheeba Saleem, Ajay Yadav
{"title":"顺势预防砷30c对COVID-19疫苗相关不良事件的影响:一项联合回顾性-前瞻性队列研究","authors":"Debadatta Nayak, Ruchika Bhalla, Lovepreet Kaur, Divya Bansal, Smita Singh, Navita Bagdi, James Michael, Abhishek Chaudhuri, Lalit Tyagi, Bhavna Makhija, Shikha Madaan, Deblina Das, Indu Shukla, Srimonti Sanyal, Khan Sheeba Saleem, Ajay Yadav","doi":"10.1055/a-2512-9763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> <i>Arsenicum album</i> 30C (<i>AA30</i>) was recommended by the Government of India for the prevention of coronavirus infection. In the wake of the reporting of COVID-19 vaccine-related adverse events (AEs) and consequent vaccine hesitancy, this study was undertaken to assess the impact of homeo-prophylactic <i>AA30</i> on COVID-19 vaccine-related AEs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> This was a combined retrospective-prospective cohort study that included participants who had been enrolled in an ongoing prospective, parallel cohort study being conducted in urban slums of New Delhi and who had received either or both doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. The reporting of COVID-19 vaccine-related AEs was compared between a cohort that had been receiving homeopathic <i>AA30</i> as a prophylactic for influenza-like/COVID-like illness with one in which no homeopathic intervention was provided.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 1,737 participants who received either or both doses of vaccination for COVID-19 were included in the study, out of whom 436 participants were from the medicine cohort (MC) and 1,301 were from the control cohort (CC). Overall odds of developing AEs after either dose of COVID-19 vaccine in MC as compared with CC was found to be statistically significantly lower (overall crude OR = 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.23 to 0.37; <i>p</i> = 0.0001). The adjusted OR after accounting for age, sex, co-morbidities and vaccine type was 0.30 (95% CI = 0.24 to 0.39; <i>p</i> = 0.0001). The protective effect of the medicine against post-vaccination AEs was evident after the first dose as well as after the second dose, with overall crude OR being 0.37 (95% CI = 0.29 to 0.48; <i>p</i> = 0.0001) and 0.28 (95% CI = 0.19 to 0.41; <i>p</i> = 0.0001) respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Prior use of the homeopathic medicine <i>AA30</i> was able to significantly reduce COVID-19 vaccine-related AEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13227,"journal":{"name":"Homeopathy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Homeoprophylactic Arsenicum album 30c on COVID-19 Vaccine-related Adverse Events: A Combined Retrospective-Prospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Debadatta Nayak, Ruchika Bhalla, Lovepreet Kaur, Divya Bansal, Smita Singh, Navita Bagdi, James Michael, Abhishek Chaudhuri, Lalit Tyagi, Bhavna Makhija, Shikha Madaan, Deblina Das, Indu Shukla, Srimonti Sanyal, Khan Sheeba Saleem, Ajay Yadav\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2512-9763\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> <i>Arsenicum album</i> 30C (<i>AA30</i>) was recommended by the Government of India for the prevention of coronavirus infection. In the wake of the reporting of COVID-19 vaccine-related adverse events (AEs) and consequent vaccine hesitancy, this study was undertaken to assess the impact of homeo-prophylactic <i>AA30</i> on COVID-19 vaccine-related AEs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> This was a combined retrospective-prospective cohort study that included participants who had been enrolled in an ongoing prospective, parallel cohort study being conducted in urban slums of New Delhi and who had received either or both doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. The reporting of COVID-19 vaccine-related AEs was compared between a cohort that had been receiving homeopathic <i>AA30</i> as a prophylactic for influenza-like/COVID-like illness with one in which no homeopathic intervention was provided.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 1,737 participants who received either or both doses of vaccination for COVID-19 were included in the study, out of whom 436 participants were from the medicine cohort (MC) and 1,301 were from the control cohort (CC). Overall odds of developing AEs after either dose of COVID-19 vaccine in MC as compared with CC was found to be statistically significantly lower (overall crude OR = 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.23 to 0.37; <i>p</i> = 0.0001). The adjusted OR after accounting for age, sex, co-morbidities and vaccine type was 0.30 (95% CI = 0.24 to 0.39; <i>p</i> = 0.0001). The protective effect of the medicine against post-vaccination AEs was evident after the first dose as well as after the second dose, with overall crude OR being 0.37 (95% CI = 0.29 to 0.48; <i>p</i> = 0.0001) and 0.28 (95% CI = 0.19 to 0.41; <i>p</i> = 0.0001) respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Prior use of the homeopathic medicine <i>AA30</i> was able to significantly reduce COVID-19 vaccine-related AEs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Homeopathy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Homeopathy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2512-9763\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Homeopathy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2512-9763","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:印度政府推荐使用砷30C (AA30)预防冠状病毒感染。在报道了COVID-19疫苗相关不良事件(ae)和随之而来的疫苗犹豫之后,本研究旨在评估同型预防AA30对COVID-19疫苗相关ae的影响。方法:这是一项回顾性-前瞻性联合队列研究,纳入了在新德里城市贫民窟进行的一项正在进行的前瞻性平行队列研究的参与者,他们接受了一剂或两剂COVID-19疫苗。将接受顺势疗法AA30作为流感样/ covid样疾病预防措施的队列与未提供顺势疗法干预的队列之间的COVID-19疫苗相关ae报告进行了比较。结果:共有1737名接种了一剂或两剂COVID-19疫苗的参与者被纳入研究,其中436名参与者来自药物队列(MC), 1301名来自对照队列(CC)。与CC相比,MC患者接种两剂COVID-19疫苗后发生ae的总几率在统计学上显著降低(总体粗OR = 0.29, 95%可信区间[CI] = 0.23 ~ 0.37;p = 0.0001)。考虑到年龄、性别、合并症和疫苗类型后的调整OR为0.30 (95% CI = 0.24 ~ 0.39;p = 0.0001)。该药物对疫苗接种后ae的保护作用在第一次剂量和第二次剂量后都很明显,总体粗OR为0.37 (95% CI = 0.29 ~ 0.48;p = 0.0001)和0.28 (95% CI = 0.19 ~ 0.41;P = 0.0001)。结论:既往使用顺势疗法药物AA30可显著降低COVID-19疫苗相关不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Homeoprophylactic Arsenicum album 30c on COVID-19 Vaccine-related Adverse Events: A Combined Retrospective-Prospective Cohort Study.

Objective: Arsenicum album 30C (AA30) was recommended by the Government of India for the prevention of coronavirus infection. In the wake of the reporting of COVID-19 vaccine-related adverse events (AEs) and consequent vaccine hesitancy, this study was undertaken to assess the impact of homeo-prophylactic AA30 on COVID-19 vaccine-related AEs.

Methods:  This was a combined retrospective-prospective cohort study that included participants who had been enrolled in an ongoing prospective, parallel cohort study being conducted in urban slums of New Delhi and who had received either or both doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. The reporting of COVID-19 vaccine-related AEs was compared between a cohort that had been receiving homeopathic AA30 as a prophylactic for influenza-like/COVID-like illness with one in which no homeopathic intervention was provided.

Results:  A total of 1,737 participants who received either or both doses of vaccination for COVID-19 were included in the study, out of whom 436 participants were from the medicine cohort (MC) and 1,301 were from the control cohort (CC). Overall odds of developing AEs after either dose of COVID-19 vaccine in MC as compared with CC was found to be statistically significantly lower (overall crude OR = 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.23 to 0.37; p = 0.0001). The adjusted OR after accounting for age, sex, co-morbidities and vaccine type was 0.30 (95% CI = 0.24 to 0.39; p = 0.0001). The protective effect of the medicine against post-vaccination AEs was evident after the first dose as well as after the second dose, with overall crude OR being 0.37 (95% CI = 0.29 to 0.48; p = 0.0001) and 0.28 (95% CI = 0.19 to 0.41; p = 0.0001) respectively.

Conclusion:  Prior use of the homeopathic medicine AA30 was able to significantly reduce COVID-19 vaccine-related AEs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Homeopathy
Homeopathy 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
70.60%
发文量
34
审稿时长
20.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Homeopathy is an international peer-reviewed journal aimed at improving the fundamental understanding and clinical practice of homeopathy by publishing relevant high-quality original research articles, reviews, and case reports. It also promotes commentary and debate on matters of topical interest in homeopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信