减少膝关节多韧带损伤植入物的成本。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2025-03-09 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1007/s43465-025-01352-2
Santosh K Sahanand, Govind Karunakaran, Girinivasan Chellamuthu, David V Rajan
{"title":"减少膝关节多韧带损伤植入物的成本。","authors":"Santosh K Sahanand, Govind Karunakaran, Girinivasan Chellamuthu, David V Rajan","doi":"10.1007/s43465-025-01352-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The recent advances in surgical techniques have resulted in increasing number of knee preservation surgeries including ligament reconstructions/repairs which adds to the financial burden in healthcare. Important hurdles in doing arthroscopic surgery are high cost and lack of sophisticated options like allografts. To overcome these, we have developed some simple yet effective implant-minimizing techniques (IMTs) which help minimize implants use and allografts for ligament reconstruction around knee.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>IMTs help us in minimizing the cost burden by reducing the amount of implants used in multiligament surgeries of knee. There are 4 IMTs that bypass implants for graft fixation. They include 1. <i>Confluent tunnel technique</i> for combined ACL, LCL reconstruction, combined PCL, MCL reconstruction, and combined ACL, ALL reconstruction; 2. <i>bone bridge technique</i> for the combined ACL reconstruction and meniscal root repair, combined ACL, and ALL reconstruction, and tibial MCL repair; 3. <i>suture bridge technique</i> for MPFL reconstruction; and 4. <i>cinch knot technique</i> for LCL reconstruction. The cost- effectiveness between two techniques were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our methods proved to be cost effective with a percentage difference in cost of more than 60 percentage when compared to standard methods of fixation. Patients showed good-to-excellent functional outcomes, with no major complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IMTs helped us minimize cost by 60 percentage when compared to standard techniques. They also helped us minimize graft usage, preserve bone stock and avoid tunnel convergence particularly useful in smaller Indian knees. These techniques can be followed without special instrumentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":"59 4","pages":"512-520"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12014973/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost Mitigation Using Implant-Minimizing Techniques in Multiligamentous Injuries of Knee.\",\"authors\":\"Santosh K Sahanand, Govind Karunakaran, Girinivasan Chellamuthu, David V Rajan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43465-025-01352-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The recent advances in surgical techniques have resulted in increasing number of knee preservation surgeries including ligament reconstructions/repairs which adds to the financial burden in healthcare. Important hurdles in doing arthroscopic surgery are high cost and lack of sophisticated options like allografts. To overcome these, we have developed some simple yet effective implant-minimizing techniques (IMTs) which help minimize implants use and allografts for ligament reconstruction around knee.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>IMTs help us in minimizing the cost burden by reducing the amount of implants used in multiligament surgeries of knee. There are 4 IMTs that bypass implants for graft fixation. They include 1. <i>Confluent tunnel technique</i> for combined ACL, LCL reconstruction, combined PCL, MCL reconstruction, and combined ACL, ALL reconstruction; 2. <i>bone bridge technique</i> for the combined ACL reconstruction and meniscal root repair, combined ACL, and ALL reconstruction, and tibial MCL repair; 3. <i>suture bridge technique</i> for MPFL reconstruction; and 4. <i>cinch knot technique</i> for LCL reconstruction. The cost- effectiveness between two techniques were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our methods proved to be cost effective with a percentage difference in cost of more than 60 percentage when compared to standard methods of fixation. Patients showed good-to-excellent functional outcomes, with no major complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IMTs helped us minimize cost by 60 percentage when compared to standard techniques. They also helped us minimize graft usage, preserve bone stock and avoid tunnel convergence particularly useful in smaller Indian knees. These techniques can be followed without special instrumentation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"59 4\",\"pages\":\"512-520\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12014973/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-025-01352-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-025-01352-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:最近外科技术的进步导致越来越多的膝关节保护手术,包括韧带重建/修复,这增加了医疗保健的经济负担。进行关节镜手术的主要障碍是高成本和缺乏像同种异体移植这样复杂的选择。为了克服这些问题,我们开发了一些简单而有效的植入物最小化技术(IMTs),有助于减少植入物的使用和膝关节周围韧带重建的同种异体移植物。方法:IMTs通过减少膝关节多韧带手术中植入物的数量,减少手术费用负担。有4例imt绕过植入物进行移植物固定。它们包括1。联合ACL、LCL重建、联合PCL、MCL重建、联合ACL、ALL重建的融合隧道技术;2. 骨桥技术用于前交叉韧带联合重建和半月板根修复、前交叉韧带联合重建和ALL重建以及胫骨前交叉韧带修复;3. 缝合桥技术重建强韧带;和4。夹结技术在LCL重建中的应用。分析了两种技术的成本效益。结果:与标准固定方法相比,我们的方法证明具有成本效益,成本差异超过60%。患者表现出良好至优异的功能预后,无重大并发症。结论:与标准技术相比,IMTs帮助我们将成本降低了60%。它们还帮助我们减少移植物的使用,保护骨存量,避免隧道收敛,特别是对较小的印度膝盖有用。这些技术可以在没有特殊仪器的情况下使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost Mitigation Using Implant-Minimizing Techniques in Multiligamentous Injuries of Knee.

Introduction: The recent advances in surgical techniques have resulted in increasing number of knee preservation surgeries including ligament reconstructions/repairs which adds to the financial burden in healthcare. Important hurdles in doing arthroscopic surgery are high cost and lack of sophisticated options like allografts. To overcome these, we have developed some simple yet effective implant-minimizing techniques (IMTs) which help minimize implants use and allografts for ligament reconstruction around knee.

Methods: IMTs help us in minimizing the cost burden by reducing the amount of implants used in multiligament surgeries of knee. There are 4 IMTs that bypass implants for graft fixation. They include 1. Confluent tunnel technique for combined ACL, LCL reconstruction, combined PCL, MCL reconstruction, and combined ACL, ALL reconstruction; 2. bone bridge technique for the combined ACL reconstruction and meniscal root repair, combined ACL, and ALL reconstruction, and tibial MCL repair; 3. suture bridge technique for MPFL reconstruction; and 4. cinch knot technique for LCL reconstruction. The cost- effectiveness between two techniques were analyzed.

Results: Our methods proved to be cost effective with a percentage difference in cost of more than 60 percentage when compared to standard methods of fixation. Patients showed good-to-excellent functional outcomes, with no major complications.

Conclusion: IMTs helped us minimize cost by 60 percentage when compared to standard techniques. They also helped us minimize graft usage, preserve bone stock and avoid tunnel convergence particularly useful in smaller Indian knees. These techniques can be followed without special instrumentation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信