跨激素受体乳腺癌亚型乳腺癌危险因素的因果影响:一项双样本孟德尔随机化研究。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Renée M G Verdiesen, Mehrnoosh Shokouhi, Stephen Burgess, Sander Canisius, Jenny Chang-Claude, Stig E Bojesen, Marjanka K Schmidt
{"title":"跨激素受体乳腺癌亚型乳腺癌危险因素的因果影响:一项双样本孟德尔随机化研究。","authors":"Renée M G Verdiesen, Mehrnoosh Shokouhi, Stephen Burgess, Sander Canisius, Jenny Chang-Claude, Stig E Bojesen, Marjanka K Schmidt","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is unclear if established breast cancer risk factors exert similar causal effects across hormone receptor breast cancer subtypes. We estimated and compared causal estimates of height, body mass index (BMI), type 2 diabetes, age at menarche, age at menopause, breast density, alcohol consumption, regular smoking, and physical activity across these subtypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a two-sample Mendelian randomization approach and selected genetic instrumental variables from large-scale GWAS. Publicly available summary-level BCAC data (n = 247,173; 133,384 cases, 113,789 controls) for the following subtypes were included: luminal A-like (45,253 cases); luminal B/HER2-negative-like (6,350 cases); luminal B-like (6,427 cases); HER2-enriched-like (2,884 cases); triple negative (8,602 cases). We employed multiple MR methods to evaluate the strength of causal evidence for each risk factor-subtype association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Collectively, our analyses indicated that increased height and decreased BMI are probable causal risk factors for all five subtypes. For the other risk factors, the strength of evidence for causal effects differed across subtypes. Heterogeneity in the magnitude of causal effect estimates for age at menopause and breast density was explained by null findings for triple negative tumours. Regular smoking was the sole risk factor for which there was no evidence for a causal effect on any subtype.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that established breast cancer risk factors differ across hormone receptor subtypes.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Our results are valuable for the development of primary prevention strategies, improvement of breast cancer risk stratification in the general population, and for the identification of novel breast cancer risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causal effects of breast cancer risk factors across hormone receptor breast cancer subtypes: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study.\",\"authors\":\"Renée M G Verdiesen, Mehrnoosh Shokouhi, Stephen Burgess, Sander Canisius, Jenny Chang-Claude, Stig E Bojesen, Marjanka K Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is unclear if established breast cancer risk factors exert similar causal effects across hormone receptor breast cancer subtypes. We estimated and compared causal estimates of height, body mass index (BMI), type 2 diabetes, age at menarche, age at menopause, breast density, alcohol consumption, regular smoking, and physical activity across these subtypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a two-sample Mendelian randomization approach and selected genetic instrumental variables from large-scale GWAS. Publicly available summary-level BCAC data (n = 247,173; 133,384 cases, 113,789 controls) for the following subtypes were included: luminal A-like (45,253 cases); luminal B/HER2-negative-like (6,350 cases); luminal B-like (6,427 cases); HER2-enriched-like (2,884 cases); triple negative (8,602 cases). We employed multiple MR methods to evaluate the strength of causal evidence for each risk factor-subtype association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Collectively, our analyses indicated that increased height and decreased BMI are probable causal risk factors for all five subtypes. For the other risk factors, the strength of evidence for causal effects differed across subtypes. Heterogeneity in the magnitude of causal effect estimates for age at menopause and breast density was explained by null findings for triple negative tumours. Regular smoking was the sole risk factor for which there was no evidence for a causal effect on any subtype.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that established breast cancer risk factors differ across hormone receptor subtypes.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Our results are valuable for the development of primary prevention strategies, improvement of breast cancer risk stratification in the general population, and for the identification of novel breast cancer risk factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1440\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1440","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前尚不清楚已确定的乳腺癌危险因素是否在激素受体乳腺癌亚型中具有相似的因果关系。我们估计并比较了这些亚型的身高、体重指数(BMI)、2型糖尿病、初潮年龄、绝经年龄、乳房密度、饮酒、经常吸烟和身体活动的因果估计。方法:采用双样本孟德尔随机化方法,从大规模GWAS中选择遗传工具变量。公开的汇总级BCAC数据(n = 247,173;133384例,113789例对照)包括以下亚型:腔a样(45253例);luminal B/ her2阴性样(6350例);腔内b样6427例;her2富集样(2884例);三阴性(8602例)。我们采用了多种MR方法来评估每种危险因素-亚型关联的因果证据的强度。结果:总的来说,我们的分析表明,身高增加和BMI下降可能是所有五种亚型的因果危险因素。对于其他风险因素,因果关系的证据强度因亚型而异。绝经年龄和乳腺密度的因果效应估计的异质性可以用三阴性肿瘤的零发现来解释。经常吸烟是唯一的风险因素,没有证据表明对任何亚型都有因果关系。结论:本研究表明,已确定的乳腺癌危险因素在激素受体亚型之间存在差异。影响:我们的研究结果对于制定一级预防策略、改善普通人群的乳腺癌风险分层以及识别新的乳腺癌危险因素具有重要价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Causal effects of breast cancer risk factors across hormone receptor breast cancer subtypes: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study.

Background: It is unclear if established breast cancer risk factors exert similar causal effects across hormone receptor breast cancer subtypes. We estimated and compared causal estimates of height, body mass index (BMI), type 2 diabetes, age at menarche, age at menopause, breast density, alcohol consumption, regular smoking, and physical activity across these subtypes.

Methods: We used a two-sample Mendelian randomization approach and selected genetic instrumental variables from large-scale GWAS. Publicly available summary-level BCAC data (n = 247,173; 133,384 cases, 113,789 controls) for the following subtypes were included: luminal A-like (45,253 cases); luminal B/HER2-negative-like (6,350 cases); luminal B-like (6,427 cases); HER2-enriched-like (2,884 cases); triple negative (8,602 cases). We employed multiple MR methods to evaluate the strength of causal evidence for each risk factor-subtype association.

Results: Collectively, our analyses indicated that increased height and decreased BMI are probable causal risk factors for all five subtypes. For the other risk factors, the strength of evidence for causal effects differed across subtypes. Heterogeneity in the magnitude of causal effect estimates for age at menopause and breast density was explained by null findings for triple negative tumours. Regular smoking was the sole risk factor for which there was no evidence for a causal effect on any subtype.

Conclusions: This study suggests that established breast cancer risk factors differ across hormone receptor subtypes.

Impact: Our results are valuable for the development of primary prevention strategies, improvement of breast cancer risk stratification in the general population, and for the identification of novel breast cancer risk factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
538
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信