免疫介导的坏死性肌病和皮肌炎中大腿肌肉受累的MRI模式。

IF 2.1 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Anson W Wilks, Kiana M Vakil-Gilani, William D Rooney, Dongseok Choi, Daniela Ghetie, Nizar Chahin
{"title":"免疫介导的坏死性肌病和皮肌炎中大腿肌肉受累的MRI模式。","authors":"Anson W Wilks, Kiana M Vakil-Gilani, William D Rooney, Dongseok Choi, Daniela Ghetie, Nizar Chahin","doi":"10.1186/s41927-025-00500-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) and dermatomyositis (DM) are characterized by weakness, hyperCKemia, associated autoantibodies, and varying extramuscular manifestations. Muscle MRI, currently subordinate to histopathology and serology in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) classification, has an evolving role. Our study aims to define thigh muscle MRI involvement in IMNM and DM by direct comparison.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study included 25 participants, who met IIM classification criteria (14 IMNM, 11 DM) and had available thigh MRI. Clinical and paraclinical data were available and reviewed. 11 muscles were graded for edema on MRI using a semi-quantitative scale (0: normal, 1: <30% of muscle involvement, 2: 31-75%, 3: > 75%). For 3 participants with no significant muscle edema, muscle fatty infiltration was scored according to the same scale. Using linear mixed-effects models, muscle scores were compared between the two groups and a secondary analysis was performed of only edema scores, excluding the 3 participants with fatty infiltration scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most affected muscles in IMNM were the semimembranosus (3.0 [2.7-3.0] {median [IQR]}), biceps femoris-long head (BF-LH) (2.7 [2.0-3.0]), and adductors (2.5 [2.0-3.0]). In DM, the most affected muscles were the vastus lateralis (2.7 [2.3-3.0]), vastus intermedius (2.9 [2.2-3.0]), vastus medialis (2.3 [1.7-2.7]), semitendinosus (2.2 [1.0-2.7]), rectus femoris (RF) (2.0 [1.0-2.8]), biceps femoris-short head (BF-SH) (1.9 [1.0-2.7]), gracilis, and sartorius. Intergroup statistical difference of scores was significant (p < 0.01) for 10/11 thigh muscles excluding the RF (p = 0.19), supporting an inverse relationship of muscle involvement for DM and IMNM. The secondary comparative analysis of only muscle edema scores was significant (p < 0.05) for the same 10/11 muscles with a consistent direction for all comparisons.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DM and IMNM affect disparate thigh muscles on MRI. DM preferentially affects the anterior thigh, semitendinosus and BF-SH in the posterior thigh, and gracilis in the medial thigh, whereas IMNM preferentially affects the posterior thigh (semimembranosus and BF-LH) and adductors in the medial thigh.</p>","PeriodicalId":9150,"journal":{"name":"BMC Rheumatology","volume":"9 1","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12010673/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MRI patterns of thigh muscle involvement in immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy and dermatomyositis.\",\"authors\":\"Anson W Wilks, Kiana M Vakil-Gilani, William D Rooney, Dongseok Choi, Daniela Ghetie, Nizar Chahin\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41927-025-00500-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) and dermatomyositis (DM) are characterized by weakness, hyperCKemia, associated autoantibodies, and varying extramuscular manifestations. Muscle MRI, currently subordinate to histopathology and serology in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) classification, has an evolving role. Our study aims to define thigh muscle MRI involvement in IMNM and DM by direct comparison.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study included 25 participants, who met IIM classification criteria (14 IMNM, 11 DM) and had available thigh MRI. Clinical and paraclinical data were available and reviewed. 11 muscles were graded for edema on MRI using a semi-quantitative scale (0: normal, 1: <30% of muscle involvement, 2: 31-75%, 3: > 75%). For 3 participants with no significant muscle edema, muscle fatty infiltration was scored according to the same scale. Using linear mixed-effects models, muscle scores were compared between the two groups and a secondary analysis was performed of only edema scores, excluding the 3 participants with fatty infiltration scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most affected muscles in IMNM were the semimembranosus (3.0 [2.7-3.0] {median [IQR]}), biceps femoris-long head (BF-LH) (2.7 [2.0-3.0]), and adductors (2.5 [2.0-3.0]). In DM, the most affected muscles were the vastus lateralis (2.7 [2.3-3.0]), vastus intermedius (2.9 [2.2-3.0]), vastus medialis (2.3 [1.7-2.7]), semitendinosus (2.2 [1.0-2.7]), rectus femoris (RF) (2.0 [1.0-2.8]), biceps femoris-short head (BF-SH) (1.9 [1.0-2.7]), gracilis, and sartorius. Intergroup statistical difference of scores was significant (p < 0.01) for 10/11 thigh muscles excluding the RF (p = 0.19), supporting an inverse relationship of muscle involvement for DM and IMNM. The secondary comparative analysis of only muscle edema scores was significant (p < 0.05) for the same 10/11 muscles with a consistent direction for all comparisons.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DM and IMNM affect disparate thigh muscles on MRI. DM preferentially affects the anterior thigh, semitendinosus and BF-SH in the posterior thigh, and gracilis in the medial thigh, whereas IMNM preferentially affects the posterior thigh (semimembranosus and BF-LH) and adductors in the medial thigh.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12010673/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41927-025-00500-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41927-025-00500-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:免疫介导的坏死性肌病(IMNM)和皮肌炎(DM)的特征是虚弱、高血、相关的自身抗体和不同的肌外表现。肌肉MRI目前在特发性炎症性肌病(IIM)的分类中隶属于组织病理学和血清学,其作用不断发展。我们的研究旨在通过直接比较来确定大腿肌肉MRI对IMNM和DM的影响。方法:这项单中心、回顾性、横断面研究包括25名符合IIM分类标准的参与者(14名IMNM, 11名DM),并有可用的大腿MRI。临床和临床旁的数据是可用的,并进行了审查。采用半定量分级法对11块肌肉进行MRI水肿分级(0:正常,1:75%)。对3名无明显肌肉水肿的受试者,按相同量表对肌肉脂肪浸润进行评分。使用线性混合效应模型,比较两组之间的肌肉评分,并仅对水肿评分进行二次分析,排除了3名脂肪浸润评分的参与者。结果:IMNM受影响最大的肌肉为半膜肌(3.0 [2.7-3.0]{median [IQR]})、股长头二头肌(BF-LH)(2.7[2.0-3.0])和内收肌(2.5[2.0-3.0])。在DM中,受影响最大的肌肉是股外侧肌(2.7[2.3-3.0])、股中间肌(2.9[2.2-3.0])、股内侧肌(2.3[1.7-2.7])、半腱肌(2.2[1.0-2.7])、股直肌(2.0[1.0-2.8])、股二头肌-短头肌(BF-SH)(1.9[1.0-2.7])、股薄肌和缝阔肌。结论:DM和IMNM在MRI上对不同的大腿肌肉有影响。DM优先影响大腿前部、大腿后部的半腱肌和BF-SH以及大腿内侧的股薄肌,而IMNM优先影响大腿后部(半膜肌和BF-LH)和大腿内侧的内收肌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MRI patterns of thigh muscle involvement in immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy and dermatomyositis.

Background: Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) and dermatomyositis (DM) are characterized by weakness, hyperCKemia, associated autoantibodies, and varying extramuscular manifestations. Muscle MRI, currently subordinate to histopathology and serology in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) classification, has an evolving role. Our study aims to define thigh muscle MRI involvement in IMNM and DM by direct comparison.

Methods: This single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study included 25 participants, who met IIM classification criteria (14 IMNM, 11 DM) and had available thigh MRI. Clinical and paraclinical data were available and reviewed. 11 muscles were graded for edema on MRI using a semi-quantitative scale (0: normal, 1: <30% of muscle involvement, 2: 31-75%, 3: > 75%). For 3 participants with no significant muscle edema, muscle fatty infiltration was scored according to the same scale. Using linear mixed-effects models, muscle scores were compared between the two groups and a secondary analysis was performed of only edema scores, excluding the 3 participants with fatty infiltration scores.

Results: The most affected muscles in IMNM were the semimembranosus (3.0 [2.7-3.0] {median [IQR]}), biceps femoris-long head (BF-LH) (2.7 [2.0-3.0]), and adductors (2.5 [2.0-3.0]). In DM, the most affected muscles were the vastus lateralis (2.7 [2.3-3.0]), vastus intermedius (2.9 [2.2-3.0]), vastus medialis (2.3 [1.7-2.7]), semitendinosus (2.2 [1.0-2.7]), rectus femoris (RF) (2.0 [1.0-2.8]), biceps femoris-short head (BF-SH) (1.9 [1.0-2.7]), gracilis, and sartorius. Intergroup statistical difference of scores was significant (p < 0.01) for 10/11 thigh muscles excluding the RF (p = 0.19), supporting an inverse relationship of muscle involvement for DM and IMNM. The secondary comparative analysis of only muscle edema scores was significant (p < 0.05) for the same 10/11 muscles with a consistent direction for all comparisons.

Conclusion: DM and IMNM affect disparate thigh muscles on MRI. DM preferentially affects the anterior thigh, semitendinosus and BF-SH in the posterior thigh, and gracilis in the medial thigh, whereas IMNM preferentially affects the posterior thigh (semimembranosus and BF-LH) and adductors in the medial thigh.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Rheumatology
BMC Rheumatology Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信