{"title":"评估TikTok上的胃肠意识:结肠直肠癌、肠易激综合征和肠易激综合征叙事的内容分析。","authors":"Shivangini Duggal,Swati Mahapatra,Keith Garrison,Alejandro Robles","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nSocial media platforms like TikTok are major sources of health information but raise concerns about misinformation.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe conducted a content analysis of the top 200 TikTok videos on colorectal cancer (CRC), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Videos were categorized by content focus and narrator type.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nCRC videos were largely healthcare-provider generated (66.5%), while IBS and IBD content was mostly patient-driven (79.14% and 80.32%), with frequent misinformation. Dietary changes were commonly discussed; evidence-based treatments were underrepresented.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nGreater healthcare engagement and content regulation are needed to improve the quality of online gastrointestinal health information.","PeriodicalId":520099,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Gastrointestinal Awareness on TikTok: A Content Analysis of Colorectal Cancer, IBS, and IBD Narratives.\",\"authors\":\"Shivangini Duggal,Swati Mahapatra,Keith Garrison,Alejandro Robles\",\"doi\":\"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nSocial media platforms like TikTok are major sources of health information but raise concerns about misinformation.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nWe conducted a content analysis of the top 200 TikTok videos on colorectal cancer (CRC), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Videos were categorized by content focus and narrator type.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nCRC videos were largely healthcare-provider generated (66.5%), while IBS and IBD content was mostly patient-driven (79.14% and 80.32%), with frequent misinformation. Dietary changes were commonly discussed; evidence-based treatments were underrepresented.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nGreater healthcare engagement and content regulation are needed to improve the quality of online gastrointestinal health information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":520099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003539\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing Gastrointestinal Awareness on TikTok: A Content Analysis of Colorectal Cancer, IBS, and IBD Narratives.
BACKGROUND
Social media platforms like TikTok are major sources of health information but raise concerns about misinformation.
METHODS
We conducted a content analysis of the top 200 TikTok videos on colorectal cancer (CRC), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Videos were categorized by content focus and narrator type.
RESULTS
CRC videos were largely healthcare-provider generated (66.5%), while IBS and IBD content was mostly patient-driven (79.14% and 80.32%), with frequent misinformation. Dietary changes were commonly discussed; evidence-based treatments were underrepresented.
CONCLUSION
Greater healthcare engagement and content regulation are needed to improve the quality of online gastrointestinal health information.