无远处转移鼻咽癌18F-FDG PET/CT病灶的神经网络自动分类及预后预测

IF 9.6 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yuhu Lv, Danzha Zheng, Ruiping Wang, Zhangyongxue Zhou, Zairong Gao, Xiaoli Lan, Chunxia Qin
{"title":"无远处转移鼻咽癌18F-FDG PET/CT病灶的神经网络自动分类及预后预测","authors":"Yuhu Lv, Danzha Zheng, Ruiping Wang, Zhangyongxue Zhou, Zairong Gao, Xiaoli Lan, Chunxia Qin","doi":"10.1097/RLU.0000000000005942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the PET Assisted Reporting System (PARS) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients without distant metastasis, and to investigate the prognostic significance of the metabolic parameters.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Eighty-three NPC patients who underwent pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT were retrospectively collected. First, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PARS for diagnosing malignant lesions were calculated, using histopathology as the gold standard. Next, metabolic parameters of the primary tumor were derived using both PARS and manual segmentation. The differences and consistency between the 2 methods were analyzed. Finally, the prognostic value of PET metabolic parameters was evaluated. Prognostic analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PARS demonstrated high patient-based accuracy (97.2%), sensitivity (88.9%), and specificity (97.4%), and 96.7%, 84.0%, and 96.9% based on lesions. Manual segmentation yielded higher metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) than PARS. Metabolic parameters from both methods were highly correlated and consistent. ROC analysis showed metabolic parameters exhibited differences in prognostic prediction, but generally performed well in predicting 3-year PFS and OS overall. MTV and age were independent prognostic factors; Cox proportional-hazards models incorporating them showed significant predictive improvements when combined. Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed better prognosis in the low-risk group based on combined indicators (χ² = 42.25, P < 0.001; χ² = 20.44, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preliminary validation of PARS in NPC patients without distant metastasis shows high diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy for lesion identification and classification, and metabolic parameters correlate well with manual. MTV reflects prognosis, and its combination with age enhances prognostic prediction and risk stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":10692,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nuclear Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neural Network-based Automated Classification of 18F-FDG PET/CT Lesions and Prognosis Prediction in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Without Distant Metastasis.\",\"authors\":\"Yuhu Lv, Danzha Zheng, Ruiping Wang, Zhangyongxue Zhou, Zairong Gao, Xiaoli Lan, Chunxia Qin\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RLU.0000000000005942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the PET Assisted Reporting System (PARS) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients without distant metastasis, and to investigate the prognostic significance of the metabolic parameters.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Eighty-three NPC patients who underwent pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT were retrospectively collected. First, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PARS for diagnosing malignant lesions were calculated, using histopathology as the gold standard. Next, metabolic parameters of the primary tumor were derived using both PARS and manual segmentation. The differences and consistency between the 2 methods were analyzed. Finally, the prognostic value of PET metabolic parameters was evaluated. Prognostic analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PARS demonstrated high patient-based accuracy (97.2%), sensitivity (88.9%), and specificity (97.4%), and 96.7%, 84.0%, and 96.9% based on lesions. Manual segmentation yielded higher metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) than PARS. Metabolic parameters from both methods were highly correlated and consistent. ROC analysis showed metabolic parameters exhibited differences in prognostic prediction, but generally performed well in predicting 3-year PFS and OS overall. MTV and age were independent prognostic factors; Cox proportional-hazards models incorporating them showed significant predictive improvements when combined. Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed better prognosis in the low-risk group based on combined indicators (χ² = 42.25, P < 0.001; χ² = 20.44, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preliminary validation of PARS in NPC patients without distant metastasis shows high diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy for lesion identification and classification, and metabolic parameters correlate well with manual. MTV reflects prognosis, and its combination with age enhances prognostic prediction and risk stratification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Nuclear Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Nuclear Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000005942\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000005942","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价PET辅助报告系统(PARS)对鼻咽癌(NPC)无远处转移患者的诊断价值,探讨代谢参数对鼻咽癌预后的影响。患者和方法:回顾性收集83例鼻咽癌患者行18F-FDG PET/CT预处理。首先,以组织病理学为金标准,计算PARS诊断恶性病变的敏感性、特异性和准确性。接下来,使用PARS和人工分割获得原发肿瘤的代谢参数。分析两种方法的差异和一致性。最后,评估PET代谢参数的预后价值。进行无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的预后分析。结果:PARS具有较高的基于患者的准确性(97.2%)、敏感性(88.9%)和特异性(97.4%),基于病变的准确性分别为96.7%、84.0%和96.9%。人工分割的肿瘤代谢体积(MTV)和总病灶糖酵解(TLG)高于PARS。两种方法的代谢参数高度相关且一致。ROC分析显示,代谢参数在预测预后方面存在差异,但总体上在预测3年PFS和OS方面表现良好。MTV和年龄是独立的预后因素;结合这些因素的Cox比例风险模型显示出显著的预测性改进。Kaplan-Meier分析综合指标证实低危组预后较好(χ²= 42.25,P < 0.001;χ²= 20.44,p < 0.001)。结论:初步验证PARS在鼻咽癌无远处转移患者中对病变的识别和分类具有较高的诊断敏感性和准确性,代谢参数与手工相关良好。MTV反映预后,与年龄结合可增强预后预测和风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neural Network-based Automated Classification of 18F-FDG PET/CT Lesions and Prognosis Prediction in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Without Distant Metastasis.

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the PET Assisted Reporting System (PARS) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients without distant metastasis, and to investigate the prognostic significance of the metabolic parameters.

Patients and methods: Eighty-three NPC patients who underwent pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT were retrospectively collected. First, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PARS for diagnosing malignant lesions were calculated, using histopathology as the gold standard. Next, metabolic parameters of the primary tumor were derived using both PARS and manual segmentation. The differences and consistency between the 2 methods were analyzed. Finally, the prognostic value of PET metabolic parameters was evaluated. Prognostic analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was conducted.

Results: PARS demonstrated high patient-based accuracy (97.2%), sensitivity (88.9%), and specificity (97.4%), and 96.7%, 84.0%, and 96.9% based on lesions. Manual segmentation yielded higher metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) than PARS. Metabolic parameters from both methods were highly correlated and consistent. ROC analysis showed metabolic parameters exhibited differences in prognostic prediction, but generally performed well in predicting 3-year PFS and OS overall. MTV and age were independent prognostic factors; Cox proportional-hazards models incorporating them showed significant predictive improvements when combined. Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed better prognosis in the low-risk group based on combined indicators (χ² = 42.25, P < 0.001; χ² = 20.44, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Preliminary validation of PARS in NPC patients without distant metastasis shows high diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy for lesion identification and classification, and metabolic parameters correlate well with manual. MTV reflects prognosis, and its combination with age enhances prognostic prediction and risk stratification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Nuclear Medicine
Clinical Nuclear Medicine 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
31.10%
发文量
1113
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Nuclear Medicine is a comprehensive and current resource for professionals in the field of nuclear medicine. It caters to both generalists and specialists, offering valuable insights on how to effectively apply nuclear medicine techniques in various clinical scenarios. With a focus on timely dissemination of information, this journal covers the latest developments that impact all aspects of the specialty. Geared towards practitioners, Clinical Nuclear Medicine is the ultimate practice-oriented publication in the field of nuclear imaging. Its informative articles are complemented by numerous illustrations that demonstrate how physicians can seamlessly integrate the knowledge gained into their everyday practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信