基于MRI放射学的膝关节半月板损伤诊断。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jing Liao, Ke Yu
{"title":"基于MRI放射学的膝关节半月板损伤诊断。","authors":"Jing Liao, Ke Yu","doi":"10.1097/RCT.0000000000001759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to explore a grading diagnostic method for the binary classification of meniscal tears based on magnetic resonance imaging radiomics. We hypothesize that a radiomics model can accurately grade meniscal injuries in the knee joint. By extracting T2-weighted imaging features, a radiomics model was developed to distinguish meniscal tears from nontear abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included imaging data from 100 patients at our institution between May 2022 and May 2024. The study subjects were patients with knee pain or functional impairment, excluding those with severe osteoarthritis, infections, meniscal cysts, or other relevant conditions. The patients were randomly allocated to the training group and test group in a 4:1 ratio. Sagittal fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging sequences were utilized to extract radiomic features. Feature selection was performed using the minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) method, and the final model was constructed using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression. Model performance was evaluated on both the training and test sets using receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that the model achieved area under the curve values of 0.95 and 0.94 on the training and test sets, respectively, indicating high accuracy in distinguishing meniscal injury from noninjury. In confusion matrix analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the training set were 88%, 92%, and 87%, respectively, while the test set showed sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 89%, 82%, and 85%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our radiomics model demonstrates high accuracy in distinguishing meniscal tears from nontear abnormalities, providing a reliable tool for clinical decision-making. Although the model demonstrated slightly lower specificity in the test set, its overall performance was good with high diagnostic capabilities. Future research could incorporate more clinical data to optimize the model and further improve diagnostic accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MRI Radiomics-Based Diagnosis of Knee Meniscal Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Jing Liao, Ke Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RCT.0000000000001759\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to explore a grading diagnostic method for the binary classification of meniscal tears based on magnetic resonance imaging radiomics. We hypothesize that a radiomics model can accurately grade meniscal injuries in the knee joint. By extracting T2-weighted imaging features, a radiomics model was developed to distinguish meniscal tears from nontear abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included imaging data from 100 patients at our institution between May 2022 and May 2024. The study subjects were patients with knee pain or functional impairment, excluding those with severe osteoarthritis, infections, meniscal cysts, or other relevant conditions. The patients were randomly allocated to the training group and test group in a 4:1 ratio. Sagittal fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging sequences were utilized to extract radiomic features. Feature selection was performed using the minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) method, and the final model was constructed using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression. Model performance was evaluated on both the training and test sets using receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that the model achieved area under the curve values of 0.95 and 0.94 on the training and test sets, respectively, indicating high accuracy in distinguishing meniscal injury from noninjury. In confusion matrix analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the training set were 88%, 92%, and 87%, respectively, while the test set showed sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 89%, 82%, and 85%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our radiomics model demonstrates high accuracy in distinguishing meniscal tears from nontear abnormalities, providing a reliable tool for clinical decision-making. Although the model demonstrated slightly lower specificity in the test set, its overall performance was good with high diagnostic capabilities. Future research could incorporate more clinical data to optimize the model and further improve diagnostic accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001759\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001759","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨一种基于磁共振成像放射组学的半月板撕裂二元分类分级诊断方法。我们假设放射组学模型可以准确分级膝关节半月板损伤。通过提取t2加权成像特征,建立放射组学模型来区分半月板撕裂和非撕裂异常。材料和方法:本回顾性研究纳入了我院2022年5月至2024年5月期间100例患者的影像学数据。研究对象是膝关节疼痛或功能障碍的患者,不包括严重骨关节炎、感染、半月板囊肿或其他相关疾病的患者。将患者按4:1的比例随机分为训练组和试验组。矢状面脂肪抑制t2加权成像序列用于提取放射学特征。使用最小冗余最大相关性(mRMR)方法进行特征选择,并使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归构建最终模型。在训练集和测试集上使用受试者工作特征曲线、灵敏度、特异性和准确性来评估模型的性能。结果:该模型在训练集和测试集的曲线下面积分别达到0.95和0.94,表明该模型对半月板损伤和非损伤的区分准确率较高。在混淆矩阵分析中,训练集的灵敏度、特异度和准确度分别为88%、92%和87%,而测试集的灵敏度、特异度和准确度分别为89%、82%和85%。结论:我们的放射组学模型在区分半月板撕裂和非撕裂异常方面具有很高的准确性,为临床决策提供了可靠的工具。虽然该模型在测试集中特异性略低,但整体性能良好,诊断能力较高。未来的研究可以纳入更多的临床数据来优化模型,进一步提高诊断的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MRI Radiomics-Based Diagnosis of Knee Meniscal Injury.

Objective: This study aims to explore a grading diagnostic method for the binary classification of meniscal tears based on magnetic resonance imaging radiomics. We hypothesize that a radiomics model can accurately grade meniscal injuries in the knee joint. By extracting T2-weighted imaging features, a radiomics model was developed to distinguish meniscal tears from nontear abnormalities.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included imaging data from 100 patients at our institution between May 2022 and May 2024. The study subjects were patients with knee pain or functional impairment, excluding those with severe osteoarthritis, infections, meniscal cysts, or other relevant conditions. The patients were randomly allocated to the training group and test group in a 4:1 ratio. Sagittal fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging sequences were utilized to extract radiomic features. Feature selection was performed using the minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) method, and the final model was constructed using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression. Model performance was evaluated on both the training and test sets using receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

Results: The results showed that the model achieved area under the curve values of 0.95 and 0.94 on the training and test sets, respectively, indicating high accuracy in distinguishing meniscal injury from noninjury. In confusion matrix analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the training set were 88%, 92%, and 87%, respectively, while the test set showed sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 89%, 82%, and 85%, respectively.

Conclusions: Our radiomics model demonstrates high accuracy in distinguishing meniscal tears from nontear abnormalities, providing a reliable tool for clinical decision-making. Although the model demonstrated slightly lower specificity in the test set, its overall performance was good with high diagnostic capabilities. Future research could incorporate more clinical data to optimize the model and further improve diagnostic accuracy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
230
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography is to showcase the latest clinical and research developments in CT, MR, and closely related diagnostic techniques. We encourage submission of both original research and review articles that have immediate or promissory clinical applications. Topics of special interest include: 1) functional MR and CT of the brain and body; 2) advanced/innovative MRI techniques (diffusion, perfusion, rapid scanning); and 3) advanced/innovative CT techniques (perfusion, multi-energy, dose-reduction, and processing).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信