Maria Mazzitelli, Maria Raffaella Petrara, Claudia Cozzolino, Lolita Sasset, Davide Leoni, Elena Ruffoni, Samuele Gardin, Beatrice Bragato, Angela Panese, Vincenzo Scaglione, Baldo Vincenzo, Anita De Rossi, Anna Maria Cattelan
{"title":"转向长效卡博特韦/利匹韦林的人的免疫概况和HIV库:来自现实生活前瞻性研究的发现。","authors":"Maria Mazzitelli, Maria Raffaella Petrara, Claudia Cozzolino, Lolita Sasset, Davide Leoni, Elena Ruffoni, Samuele Gardin, Beatrice Bragato, Angela Panese, Vincenzo Scaglione, Baldo Vincenzo, Anita De Rossi, Anna Maria Cattelan","doi":"10.1111/hiv.70030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Data on the dynamics of HIV-DNA and immune profiles under treatment with long-acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine (LACR) are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively enrolled people living with HIV who initiated LACR in our centre and assessed changes in HIV-DNA levels (measured by digital droplet PCR), as well as immune activated, senescent, exhausted, and regulatory T and B cells (analysed by flow cytometry), in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from baseline (T0) to 48 weeks of treatment (T5). Bivariate analyses, one-way repeated measures ANOVA and mixed ANOVA were conducted to assess differences in characteristics and biomarker changes over time between individuals switching to LACR from a dual (Group A) or triple (Group B) antiretroviral regimen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 71 persons were included (77.5% males, median age of 48 years). Overall, HIV-DNA levels exhibited a slight non-significant decrease, whereas activated CD8 cells decreased significantly (p < 0.001). Proportions of activated CD4 and regulatory T cells showed strong negative trends, but decreases did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.002 and 0.005). The dynamics of these markers within the two subgroups mirrored those of the entire cohort, with some differences. At baseline, Group A tended to exhibit higher levels of HIV-DNA (96 [31-160] vs. 41 [6-93] copies/10<sup>6</sup> PBMC, p = 0.088), and activated CD4 (% activated CD4 cells: 2.3 [1-2.9] vs. 1 [0.7-2], p = 0.154) and CD8 cells (% activated CD8 cells: 4.9 [2.2-5.8] vs. 2.2 [1.2-3.5], p = 0.023) than Group B. Over the 48-week treatment period, HIV-DNA levels decreased slightly in both groups, remaining higher in Group A. At the end of the 48-week treatment period, the decrease of activated CD4 and CD8 cells was more pronounced in Group A than in Group B, ultimately reaching comparable levels between the two groups (% of activated CD4 cells: 0.9 [0.6-1.9] vs. 0.7 [0.6-1.1], p = 0.502): % of CD8 activated cells: (2 [1.3-2.5] vs. 1.6 [0.9-2.2], p = 0.278).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During the first year of treatment, LACR does not significantly impact the HIV reservoir. However, it may reduce immune activation, particularly in persons switching from a dual therapy regimen.</p>","PeriodicalId":13176,"journal":{"name":"HIV Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immune profiles and HIV reservoir in people switching to long-acting cabotegravir/rilpivirine: Findings from a real-life prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Mazzitelli, Maria Raffaella Petrara, Claudia Cozzolino, Lolita Sasset, Davide Leoni, Elena Ruffoni, Samuele Gardin, Beatrice Bragato, Angela Panese, Vincenzo Scaglione, Baldo Vincenzo, Anita De Rossi, Anna Maria Cattelan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hiv.70030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Data on the dynamics of HIV-DNA and immune profiles under treatment with long-acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine (LACR) are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively enrolled people living with HIV who initiated LACR in our centre and assessed changes in HIV-DNA levels (measured by digital droplet PCR), as well as immune activated, senescent, exhausted, and regulatory T and B cells (analysed by flow cytometry), in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from baseline (T0) to 48 weeks of treatment (T5). Bivariate analyses, one-way repeated measures ANOVA and mixed ANOVA were conducted to assess differences in characteristics and biomarker changes over time between individuals switching to LACR from a dual (Group A) or triple (Group B) antiretroviral regimen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 71 persons were included (77.5% males, median age of 48 years). Overall, HIV-DNA levels exhibited a slight non-significant decrease, whereas activated CD8 cells decreased significantly (p < 0.001). Proportions of activated CD4 and regulatory T cells showed strong negative trends, but decreases did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.002 and 0.005). The dynamics of these markers within the two subgroups mirrored those of the entire cohort, with some differences. At baseline, Group A tended to exhibit higher levels of HIV-DNA (96 [31-160] vs. 41 [6-93] copies/10<sup>6</sup> PBMC, p = 0.088), and activated CD4 (% activated CD4 cells: 2.3 [1-2.9] vs. 1 [0.7-2], p = 0.154) and CD8 cells (% activated CD8 cells: 4.9 [2.2-5.8] vs. 2.2 [1.2-3.5], p = 0.023) than Group B. Over the 48-week treatment period, HIV-DNA levels decreased slightly in both groups, remaining higher in Group A. At the end of the 48-week treatment period, the decrease of activated CD4 and CD8 cells was more pronounced in Group A than in Group B, ultimately reaching comparable levels between the two groups (% of activated CD4 cells: 0.9 [0.6-1.9] vs. 0.7 [0.6-1.1], p = 0.502): % of CD8 activated cells: (2 [1.3-2.5] vs. 1.6 [0.9-2.2], p = 0.278).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During the first year of treatment, LACR does not significantly impact the HIV reservoir. However, it may reduce immune activation, particularly in persons switching from a dual therapy regimen.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HIV Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HIV Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/hiv.70030\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIV Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hiv.70030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在长效cabotegravir和rilpivirine (LACR)治疗下,HIV-DNA和免疫谱的动态数据是有限的。方法:我们前瞻性地招募了在我们中心启动LACR的HIV感染者,并评估了从基线(T0)到48周治疗(T5)期间外周血单核细胞(PBMC)中HIV- dna水平(通过数字液滴PCR测量)以及免疫激活、衰老、衰竭和调节性T细胞和B细胞(通过流式细胞术分析)的变化。通过双变量分析、单向重复测量方差分析和混合方差分析来评估从双抗逆转录病毒治疗方案(a组)或三抗逆转录病毒治疗方案(B组)切换到LACR治疗方案的个体之间的特征差异和生物标志物随时间的变化。结果:共纳入71例,其中男性77.5%,中位年龄48岁。总的来说,HIV-DNA水平显示出轻微的非显著性下降,而活化的CD8细胞显著下降(p 6 PBMC, p = 0.088),活化的CD4细胞(百分比活化CD4细胞:2.3[1-2.9]比1 [0.7-2],p = 0.154)和CD8细胞(百分比活化CD8细胞:(4.9 [2.2-5.8] vs. 2.2 [1.2-3.5], p = 0.023)。在48周的治疗期间,两组的HIV-DNA水平均略有下降,但A组仍高于B组。48周治疗结束时,A组的活化CD4和CD8细胞的减少比B组更为明显,最终达到两组相当的水平(活化CD4细胞百分比:0.9 [0.6-1.9]vs. 0.7 [0.6-1.1], p = 0.502):(2 [1.3-2.5] vs. 1.6 [0.9-2.2], p = 0.278)。结论:在治疗的第一年,LACR对HIV库没有显著影响。然而,它可能会降低免疫激活,特别是在从双重治疗方案转换的人。
Immune profiles and HIV reservoir in people switching to long-acting cabotegravir/rilpivirine: Findings from a real-life prospective study.
Introduction: Data on the dynamics of HIV-DNA and immune profiles under treatment with long-acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine (LACR) are limited.
Methods: We prospectively enrolled people living with HIV who initiated LACR in our centre and assessed changes in HIV-DNA levels (measured by digital droplet PCR), as well as immune activated, senescent, exhausted, and regulatory T and B cells (analysed by flow cytometry), in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from baseline (T0) to 48 weeks of treatment (T5). Bivariate analyses, one-way repeated measures ANOVA and mixed ANOVA were conducted to assess differences in characteristics and biomarker changes over time between individuals switching to LACR from a dual (Group A) or triple (Group B) antiretroviral regimen.
Results: A total of 71 persons were included (77.5% males, median age of 48 years). Overall, HIV-DNA levels exhibited a slight non-significant decrease, whereas activated CD8 cells decreased significantly (p < 0.001). Proportions of activated CD4 and regulatory T cells showed strong negative trends, but decreases did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.002 and 0.005). The dynamics of these markers within the two subgroups mirrored those of the entire cohort, with some differences. At baseline, Group A tended to exhibit higher levels of HIV-DNA (96 [31-160] vs. 41 [6-93] copies/106 PBMC, p = 0.088), and activated CD4 (% activated CD4 cells: 2.3 [1-2.9] vs. 1 [0.7-2], p = 0.154) and CD8 cells (% activated CD8 cells: 4.9 [2.2-5.8] vs. 2.2 [1.2-3.5], p = 0.023) than Group B. Over the 48-week treatment period, HIV-DNA levels decreased slightly in both groups, remaining higher in Group A. At the end of the 48-week treatment period, the decrease of activated CD4 and CD8 cells was more pronounced in Group A than in Group B, ultimately reaching comparable levels between the two groups (% of activated CD4 cells: 0.9 [0.6-1.9] vs. 0.7 [0.6-1.1], p = 0.502): % of CD8 activated cells: (2 [1.3-2.5] vs. 1.6 [0.9-2.2], p = 0.278).
Conclusion: During the first year of treatment, LACR does not significantly impact the HIV reservoir. However, it may reduce immune activation, particularly in persons switching from a dual therapy regimen.
期刊介绍:
HIV Medicine aims to provide an alternative outlet for publication of international research papers in the field of HIV Medicine, embracing clinical, pharmocological, epidemiological, ethical, preclinical and in vitro studies. In addition, the journal will commission reviews and other feature articles. It will focus on evidence-based medicine as the mainstay of successful management of HIV and AIDS. The journal is specifically aimed at researchers and clinicians with responsibility for treating HIV seropositive patients.