不同喷砂参数对增材制造和加工钛表面性能的影响。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
In vivo Pub Date : 2025-05-01 DOI:10.21873/invivo.13979
Osman Akbas, Leif Reck, Anne Jahn, Jörg Hermsdorf, Meike Stiesch, Andreas Greuling
{"title":"不同喷砂参数对增材制造和加工钛表面性能的影响。","authors":"Osman Akbas, Leif Reck, Anne Jahn, Jörg Hermsdorf, Meike Stiesch, Andreas Greuling","doi":"10.21873/invivo.13979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>In dentistry, the surfaces of titanium implants are often sandblasted and acid-etched in order to support successful osseointegration. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of various sandblasting parameters on the surface roughness, contact angle and surface energy of additively manufactured (TiAl6V4) and machined commercially pure titanium (cpTi) surfaces.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 56 disc-shaped samples were produced using either laser powder bed fusion (TiAl6V4) or using precision cutting (cpTi). The samples were then sandblasted with different angles, distances, and pressures using an automated sandblasting machine. Afterwards, surface roughness and contact angle for water and diiodomethane were measured, and scanning electron microscopy images were taken.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that the initially rough TiAl6V4 samples became smoother after sandblasting, while the smooth cpTi surfaces became rougher. Sandblasting pressure had the most significant influence on surface roughness. The surface energy of sandblasted TiAl6V4 samples showed no significant change compared to the as-built state (26.6±1.3 to 26.3±1.8 mJ/m<sup>2</sup>). In contrast, cpTi samples showed a reduction in surface energy after sandblasting (32.3±1.6 to 26.8±1.2 mJ/m<sup>2</sup>). Scanning electron microscopy revealed irregular surfaces with grooves and ridges for both types of samples. The roughness of TiAl6V4 decreased at higher sandblasting pressures, whereas cpTi surfaces became rougher.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surface roughness after sandblasting is strongly influenced by the initial surface, which differs in additively manufactured TiAl6V4 samples compared to machined cpTi surfaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":13364,"journal":{"name":"In vivo","volume":"39 3","pages":"1767-1785"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12042000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Different Sandblasting Parameters on the Properties of Additively Manufactured and Machined Titanium Surfaces.\",\"authors\":\"Osman Akbas, Leif Reck, Anne Jahn, Jörg Hermsdorf, Meike Stiesch, Andreas Greuling\",\"doi\":\"10.21873/invivo.13979\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>In dentistry, the surfaces of titanium implants are often sandblasted and acid-etched in order to support successful osseointegration. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of various sandblasting parameters on the surface roughness, contact angle and surface energy of additively manufactured (TiAl6V4) and machined commercially pure titanium (cpTi) surfaces.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 56 disc-shaped samples were produced using either laser powder bed fusion (TiAl6V4) or using precision cutting (cpTi). The samples were then sandblasted with different angles, distances, and pressures using an automated sandblasting machine. Afterwards, surface roughness and contact angle for water and diiodomethane were measured, and scanning electron microscopy images were taken.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that the initially rough TiAl6V4 samples became smoother after sandblasting, while the smooth cpTi surfaces became rougher. Sandblasting pressure had the most significant influence on surface roughness. The surface energy of sandblasted TiAl6V4 samples showed no significant change compared to the as-built state (26.6±1.3 to 26.3±1.8 mJ/m<sup>2</sup>). In contrast, cpTi samples showed a reduction in surface energy after sandblasting (32.3±1.6 to 26.8±1.2 mJ/m<sup>2</sup>). Scanning electron microscopy revealed irregular surfaces with grooves and ridges for both types of samples. The roughness of TiAl6V4 decreased at higher sandblasting pressures, whereas cpTi surfaces became rougher.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surface roughness after sandblasting is strongly influenced by the initial surface, which differs in additively manufactured TiAl6V4 samples compared to machined cpTi surfaces.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"In vivo\",\"volume\":\"39 3\",\"pages\":\"1767-1785\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12042000/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"In vivo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13979\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In vivo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13979","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:在牙科中,钛种植体的表面经常被喷砂和酸蚀,以支持成功的骨整合。本研究的目的是研究不同喷砂参数对增材制造(TiAl6V4)和加工商业纯钛(cpTi)表面粗糙度、接触角和表面能的影响。材料和方法:采用激光粉末床熔合(TiAl6V4)和精密切割(cpTi)制备了56个圆盘状样品。然后使用自动喷砂机以不同的角度、距离和压力对样品进行喷砂。然后测量了水和二碘甲烷的表面粗糙度和接触角,并拍摄了扫描电镜图像。结果表明:喷砂后初始粗糙的TiAl6V4试样表面变得更光滑,而光滑的cpTi表面变得更粗糙。喷砂压力对表面粗糙度的影响最为显著。喷砂后TiAl6V4试样的表面能变化不大(26.6±1.3 ~ 26.3±1.8 mJ/m2)。相比之下,cpTi样品喷砂后表面能降低(32.3±1.6至26.8±1.2 mJ/m2)。扫描电子显微镜显示,这两种类型的样品表面不规则,有凹槽和脊。喷砂压力增大时,TiAl6V4表面粗糙度降低,cpTi表面粗糙度增大。结论:喷砂后的表面粗糙度受到初始表面的强烈影响,增材制造的TiAl6V4样品与机械加工的cpTi样品的表面粗糙度不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Different Sandblasting Parameters on the Properties of Additively Manufactured and Machined Titanium Surfaces.

Background/aim: In dentistry, the surfaces of titanium implants are often sandblasted and acid-etched in order to support successful osseointegration. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of various sandblasting parameters on the surface roughness, contact angle and surface energy of additively manufactured (TiAl6V4) and machined commercially pure titanium (cpTi) surfaces.

Materials and methods: A total of 56 disc-shaped samples were produced using either laser powder bed fusion (TiAl6V4) or using precision cutting (cpTi). The samples were then sandblasted with different angles, distances, and pressures using an automated sandblasting machine. Afterwards, surface roughness and contact angle for water and diiodomethane were measured, and scanning electron microscopy images were taken.

Results: The results showed that the initially rough TiAl6V4 samples became smoother after sandblasting, while the smooth cpTi surfaces became rougher. Sandblasting pressure had the most significant influence on surface roughness. The surface energy of sandblasted TiAl6V4 samples showed no significant change compared to the as-built state (26.6±1.3 to 26.3±1.8 mJ/m2). In contrast, cpTi samples showed a reduction in surface energy after sandblasting (32.3±1.6 to 26.8±1.2 mJ/m2). Scanning electron microscopy revealed irregular surfaces with grooves and ridges for both types of samples. The roughness of TiAl6V4 decreased at higher sandblasting pressures, whereas cpTi surfaces became rougher.

Conclusion: Surface roughness after sandblasting is strongly influenced by the initial surface, which differs in additively manufactured TiAl6V4 samples compared to machined cpTi surfaces.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
In vivo
In vivo 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IN VIVO is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to bring together original high quality works and reviews on experimental and clinical biomedical research within the frames of physiology, pathology and disease management. The topics of IN VIVO include: 1. Experimental development and application of new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures; 2. Pharmacological and toxicological evaluation of new drugs, drug combinations and drug delivery systems; 3. Clinical trials; 4. Development and characterization of models of biomedical research; 5. Cancer diagnosis and treatment; 6. Immunotherapy and vaccines; 7. Radiotherapy, Imaging; 8. Tissue engineering, Regenerative medicine; 9. Carcinogenesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信