儿童和青少年抽动障碍的亚型:基于临床特征。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Kai Yang, Wenyan Zhang, Ying Li, Xianbin Wang, Zhongliang Jiang, Shujin Hu, JinHyun Jun, Qinghao Yang, Jingyi Li, Xu Hong, Yonghua Cui, Tianyuan Lei
{"title":"儿童和青少年抽动障碍的亚型:基于临床特征。","authors":"Kai Yang, Wenyan Zhang, Ying Li, Xianbin Wang, Zhongliang Jiang, Shujin Hu, JinHyun Jun, Qinghao Yang, Jingyi Li, Xu Hong, Yonghua Cui, Tianyuan Lei","doi":"10.1186/s12887-025-05698-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tic disorder (TD) is a diverse neurodevelopmental disorder with various symptoms and comorbidities. Traditional classifications based on age onset and duration fail to adequately characterize the full clinical features of TD. This study aims to redefine TD subtypes by a comprehensive analysis of clinical features and comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed 139 children and adolescents aged 6-18 years using 14 scales covering 43 dimensions. The k-means clustering algorithm was used to identify distinct TD subtypes. Differences between these subtypes were analyzed using t-tests and network analysis, with high expected influence (EI) metric representing key symptoms within each subtype.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified two distinct subtypes of TD, with 21.6% of participants classified as subtype1 and 78.4% as subtype2. Subtype1 exhibited more severe symptoms across TD, obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder assessments compared to subtype2, with significant differences observed in 81.4% of the scale features. Network analysis revealed differences in core symptoms between the two subtypes; subtype1 primarily involved hyperactivity and vital activities, whereas subtype2 primarily involved attention deficit, hyperactivity and conduct. Furthermore, comparisons with DSM-5 classifications revealed distinct patterns, indicating the novel nature of the identified subtypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study identified two novel TD subtypes, highlighting its heterogeneity. Subtype 1 had more severe attention deficits and impulsivity, requiring comprehensive treatment, while subtype 2 had milder symptoms, focusing on support and monitoring. These findings provide insights into TD classification and may help refine treatment strategies. However, the cross-sectional design limits causal interpretations, and reliance on parent-reported data may introduce bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":9144,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pediatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"349"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046735/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subtypes of tic disorders in children and adolescents: based on clinical characteristics.\",\"authors\":\"Kai Yang, Wenyan Zhang, Ying Li, Xianbin Wang, Zhongliang Jiang, Shujin Hu, JinHyun Jun, Qinghao Yang, Jingyi Li, Xu Hong, Yonghua Cui, Tianyuan Lei\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12887-025-05698-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tic disorder (TD) is a diverse neurodevelopmental disorder with various symptoms and comorbidities. Traditional classifications based on age onset and duration fail to adequately characterize the full clinical features of TD. This study aims to redefine TD subtypes by a comprehensive analysis of clinical features and comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed 139 children and adolescents aged 6-18 years using 14 scales covering 43 dimensions. The k-means clustering algorithm was used to identify distinct TD subtypes. Differences between these subtypes were analyzed using t-tests and network analysis, with high expected influence (EI) metric representing key symptoms within each subtype.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified two distinct subtypes of TD, with 21.6% of participants classified as subtype1 and 78.4% as subtype2. Subtype1 exhibited more severe symptoms across TD, obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder assessments compared to subtype2, with significant differences observed in 81.4% of the scale features. Network analysis revealed differences in core symptoms between the two subtypes; subtype1 primarily involved hyperactivity and vital activities, whereas subtype2 primarily involved attention deficit, hyperactivity and conduct. Furthermore, comparisons with DSM-5 classifications revealed distinct patterns, indicating the novel nature of the identified subtypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study identified two novel TD subtypes, highlighting its heterogeneity. Subtype 1 had more severe attention deficits and impulsivity, requiring comprehensive treatment, while subtype 2 had milder symptoms, focusing on support and monitoring. These findings provide insights into TD classification and may help refine treatment strategies. However, the cross-sectional design limits causal interpretations, and reliance on parent-reported data may introduce bias.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"349\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046735/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-025-05698-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-025-05698-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:抽动障碍(TD)是一种具有多种症状和合并症的多种神经发育障碍。基于发病年龄和病程的传统分类不能充分表征TD的全部临床特征。本研究旨在通过综合分析临床特征和合并症来重新定义TD亚型。方法:对139名6-18岁儿童和青少年进行43个维度的14个量表评估。采用k-均值聚类算法识别不同的TD亚型。使用t检验和网络分析分析这些亚型之间的差异,使用高期望影响(EI)指标表示每个亚型中的关键症状。结果:我们确定了两种不同的TD亚型,其中21.6%的参与者被归类为亚型1,78.4%的参与者被归类为亚型2。与亚型2相比,亚型1在TD、强迫症谱系障碍和注意缺陷多动障碍评估中表现出更严重的症状,在81.4%的量表特征上观察到显著差异。网络分析揭示了两种亚型之间核心症状的差异;亚型1主要涉及多动和生命活动,而亚型2主要涉及注意缺陷、多动和行为。此外,与DSM-5分类的比较揭示了不同的模式,表明所识别亚型的新颖性。结论:我们的研究确定了两种新的TD亚型,突出了其异质性。亚型1有更严重的注意缺陷和冲动,需要综合治疗,而亚型2症状较轻,注重支持和监测。这些发现为TD的分类提供了见解,并可能有助于改进治疗策略。然而,横断面设计限制了因果解释,依赖于父母报告的数据可能会引入偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Subtypes of tic disorders in children and adolescents: based on clinical characteristics.

Background: Tic disorder (TD) is a diverse neurodevelopmental disorder with various symptoms and comorbidities. Traditional classifications based on age onset and duration fail to adequately characterize the full clinical features of TD. This study aims to redefine TD subtypes by a comprehensive analysis of clinical features and comorbidities.

Methods: We assessed 139 children and adolescents aged 6-18 years using 14 scales covering 43 dimensions. The k-means clustering algorithm was used to identify distinct TD subtypes. Differences between these subtypes were analyzed using t-tests and network analysis, with high expected influence (EI) metric representing key symptoms within each subtype.

Results: We identified two distinct subtypes of TD, with 21.6% of participants classified as subtype1 and 78.4% as subtype2. Subtype1 exhibited more severe symptoms across TD, obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder assessments compared to subtype2, with significant differences observed in 81.4% of the scale features. Network analysis revealed differences in core symptoms between the two subtypes; subtype1 primarily involved hyperactivity and vital activities, whereas subtype2 primarily involved attention deficit, hyperactivity and conduct. Furthermore, comparisons with DSM-5 classifications revealed distinct patterns, indicating the novel nature of the identified subtypes.

Conclusion: Our study identified two novel TD subtypes, highlighting its heterogeneity. Subtype 1 had more severe attention deficits and impulsivity, requiring comprehensive treatment, while subtype 2 had milder symptoms, focusing on support and monitoring. These findings provide insights into TD classification and may help refine treatment strategies. However, the cross-sectional design limits causal interpretations, and reliance on parent-reported data may introduce bias.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pediatrics
BMC Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
683
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pediatrics is an open access journal publishing peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of health care in neonates, children and adolescents, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信