加强儿童机器人肾盂成形术与无接触尿路上皮方法:一个病例系列。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Niklas Pakkasjärvi, Pyry Jaakkola, Liisi Ripatti, Seppo Taskinen
{"title":"加强儿童机器人肾盂成形术与无接触尿路上皮方法:一个病例系列。","authors":"Niklas Pakkasjärvi, Pyry Jaakkola, Liisi Ripatti, Seppo Taskinen","doi":"10.1186/s12894-025-01782-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery has advanced minimally invasive urology. However, the absence of haptic feedback may increase the risk of tissue trauma. This case series evaluates a no-touch technique in robotic-assisted pyeloplasty to minimize urothelial handling and assess its feasibility and short-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective case series reviewed 20 pediatric patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction treated with robotic-assisted pyeloplasty between 2019 and 2022. In 10 cases, a no-touch urothelium approach was applied to minimize direct tissue handling. Patient selection, surgical details, perioperative outcomes, and follow-up at 6 and 12 months were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The no-touch approach was successfully implemented in all cases without intraoperative complications. Median console time was 98 min (IQR: 81-131). Postoperative outcomes were favorable, with significant improvement or resolution of hydronephrosis in all cases. No major complications occurred, and no anastomotic strictures were observed during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The no-touch technique in robotic-assisted pyeloplasty is a feasible approach that maintains surgical efficiency while minimizing direct urothelial handling. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up are needed to validate its potential benefits.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of New Children's Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital (permit nr 5485), Finland.</p>","PeriodicalId":9285,"journal":{"name":"BMC Urology","volume":"25 1","pages":"94"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12007324/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing pediatric robotic pyeloplasty with a no-touch urothelium approach: a case series.\",\"authors\":\"Niklas Pakkasjärvi, Pyry Jaakkola, Liisi Ripatti, Seppo Taskinen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12894-025-01782-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery has advanced minimally invasive urology. However, the absence of haptic feedback may increase the risk of tissue trauma. This case series evaluates a no-touch technique in robotic-assisted pyeloplasty to minimize urothelial handling and assess its feasibility and short-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective case series reviewed 20 pediatric patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction treated with robotic-assisted pyeloplasty between 2019 and 2022. In 10 cases, a no-touch urothelium approach was applied to minimize direct tissue handling. Patient selection, surgical details, perioperative outcomes, and follow-up at 6 and 12 months were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The no-touch approach was successfully implemented in all cases without intraoperative complications. Median console time was 98 min (IQR: 81-131). Postoperative outcomes were favorable, with significant improvement or resolution of hydronephrosis in all cases. No major complications occurred, and no anastomotic strictures were observed during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The no-touch technique in robotic-assisted pyeloplasty is a feasible approach that maintains surgical efficiency while minimizing direct urothelial handling. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up are needed to validate its potential benefits.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of New Children's Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital (permit nr 5485), Finland.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Urology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12007324/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-025-01782-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-025-01782-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:机器人辅助腹腔镜手术是泌尿外科微创技术的进步。然而,缺乏触觉反馈可能会增加组织损伤的风险。本病例系列评估机器人辅助肾盂成形术中的无接触技术,以减少尿路上皮处理,并评估其可行性和短期结果。方法:本回顾性病例系列回顾了2019年至2022年期间采用机器人辅助肾盂成形术治疗的20例输尿管肾盂连接处梗阻患儿。在10例中,采用无接触尿路上皮入路以减少直接组织处理。记录了患者选择、手术细节、围手术期结果以及6个月和12个月的随访情况。结果:所有病例均成功实施无接触入路,无术中并发症。中位坐诊时间为98 min (IQR: 81-131)。术后结果良好,所有病例肾积水均有显著改善或消退。随访无重大并发症发生,无吻合口狭窄。结论:无接触技术在机器人辅助肾盂成形术中是一种可行的方法,既能保持手术效率,又能最大限度地减少对尿路上皮的直接处理。进一步的研究需要更大的样本量和更长的随访时间来验证其潜在的益处。试验注册:本研究由芬兰赫尔辛基大学医院新儿童医院机构审查委员会批准(许可号5485)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing pediatric robotic pyeloplasty with a no-touch urothelium approach: a case series.

Background: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery has advanced minimally invasive urology. However, the absence of haptic feedback may increase the risk of tissue trauma. This case series evaluates a no-touch technique in robotic-assisted pyeloplasty to minimize urothelial handling and assess its feasibility and short-term outcomes.

Methods: This retrospective case series reviewed 20 pediatric patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction treated with robotic-assisted pyeloplasty between 2019 and 2022. In 10 cases, a no-touch urothelium approach was applied to minimize direct tissue handling. Patient selection, surgical details, perioperative outcomes, and follow-up at 6 and 12 months were documented.

Results: The no-touch approach was successfully implemented in all cases without intraoperative complications. Median console time was 98 min (IQR: 81-131). Postoperative outcomes were favorable, with significant improvement or resolution of hydronephrosis in all cases. No major complications occurred, and no anastomotic strictures were observed during follow-up.

Conclusions: The no-touch technique in robotic-assisted pyeloplasty is a feasible approach that maintains surgical efficiency while minimizing direct urothelial handling. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up are needed to validate its potential benefits.

Trial registration: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of New Children's Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital (permit nr 5485), Finland.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Urology
BMC Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Urology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of urological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The journal considers manuscripts in the following broad subject-specific sections of urology: Endourology and technology Epidemiology and health outcomes Pediatric urology Pre-clinical and basic research Reconstructive urology Sexual function and fertility Urological imaging Urological oncology Voiding dysfunction Case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信